Diversität als Treiber für unser Fach

Die Radiologie steht vor großen Herausforderungen durch Fachkräftemangel und eine zunehmend diverse, das heißt vielfältige Gesellschaft. Eine gezielte Förderung von Diversität in Herkunft, Generationen und Geschlecht bis in die Führungsebene ist entscheidend, um Innovationskraft, Qualität und Attraktivität des Fachs zu sichern. Um die Vorteile diverser Teams zu nutzen, sind grundlegende Veränderungen und neue Definitionen von Führung notwendig.

Publication History

Article published online:
16 December 2025

• Literatur

• 1 Ärztestatistik der Bundesärztekammer. 2024
• 2 https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/BAEK/Ueber_uns/Statistik/AErztestatistik_2022_09062023.pdf
• 3 Ärztinnenbund.
• 4 Zentralinstitut für die Kassenärztliche Versorgung. 2024
• 5 Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge BAMF. Minas – Atlas über Migration, Integration und Asyl. 2023
• 6 Statistisches Bundesamt. 2023
• 7 Spalluto. 2020
• 8 Henderson, RSNA. 2020
• 9 Cyphers ED, de Leon E, Kagetsu NJ. Generation Z and the Radiology Workforce: Ready or Not, Here I Come. Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221: 274-275
• 10 Population by birth cohort generation and race and ethnicity. Annie E. Casey Foundation. KIDS COUNT Data Center.
• 11 Social Issues that Matter to Generation Z. The Annie E. Casey Foundation 2024. https://www.aecf.org/blog/generation-z-social-issues
• 12 How Gen Z are reshaping the healthcare industry | World Economic Forum.
• 13 Medical Women on Top Update. 2024
• 14 Blohm M, Sandblom G, Enochsson L. et al. Differences in Cholecystectomy Outcomes and Operating Time Between Male and Female Surgeons in Sweden. JAMA Surg 2023; 158: 1168-1175
• 15 Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF. et al. Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177: 206-213
• 16 Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N. et al. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ 2017; 359: j4366
• 17 Wallis CJD, Jerath A, Aminoltejari K. et al. Surgeon Sex and Long-Term Postoperative Outcomes Among founPatients Undergoing Common Surgeries. JAMA Surg 2023; 158: 1185-1194
• 18 Saka N, Yamamoto N, Watanabe J. et al. Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Treated by Male Versus Female Surgeons: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2024; 280: 945-953
• 19 Reder SR, Rohou A, Keric N. et al. Gender differences in self-assessed performance and stress level during training of basic interventional radiology maneuvers. Eur Radiol 2024; 34: 308-317
• 20 Alcaide-Leon P, Rawal S, Krings T et. Gender Differences in Diagnostic Radiology Practice: An Observational Study. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19: 90-96
• 21 Christoph Müller, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie. 2022
• 22 Statistisches Bundesamt 2025. Prüfungen an Hochschulen: Deutschland, Jahre, Nationalität, Geschlecht, Prüfungsergebnis.
• 23 Burns JM. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row; 1978
• 24 Eagly AH, Carli LL. Through the labyrinth: the truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press; 2007
• 25 Kubik-Huch RA, Vilgrain V, Krestin GP. et al. Women in radiology: gender diversity is not a metric-it is a tool for excellence. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 1644-1652
• 26 Philipps KW. How Diversity makes us Smarter. Scientific American. October 2014.
• 27 El-Mafaalani A. Das Integrationsparadox. 2018
• 28 Brown B. Dare to lead. 2018
• 29 Vassallo A, Walker K, Georgousakis M. et al. Do mentoring programmes influence women's careers in the health and medical research sector? A mixed-methods evaluation of Australia's Franklin Women Mentoring Programme. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e052560