Keywords
alcohol consumption - ALD - MetALD - animal model - liver injury
Drinking too much alcohol over a long time can lead to severe liver injury, causing
a range of liver diseases. Existing research indicated that factors such as smoking,
medication, high-fat diet, hepatitis virus infection, and circadian rhythm disruption
can exacerbate alcohol-induced liver injury. This review summarized studies on novel
alcohol plus risk factor rodent models, which more closely simulate human liver injury.
These models are beneficial for further exploring the mechanisms of alcohol-induced
liver injury in humans and guiding new treatment strategies.
Alcohol consumption is a significant risk factor threatening human health and has
become a serious issue of social health. Between 1990 and 2017, the global average
per capita alcohol consumption among adults increased from 5.9 L to 6.5 L, and it
is projected to reach 7.6 L by the year 2030.[1] The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that harmful use of alcohol resulted
in approximately 3 million deaths annually, with liver diseases being among the leading
causes.[2] As one of the primary sites of alcohol metabolism, the liver is particularly susceptible
to injury from excessive alcohol consumption.[3]
[4]
[5] Chronic excessive alcohol consumption often induces alcohol-associated liver disease
(ALD), characterized by the pathological progression of the liver due to alcohol metabolism,
including elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST),
inflammatory cell infiltration, hepatocyte swelling, and apoptosis.[6]
Globally, the prevalence of ALD was approximately 4.8%, with a history of drinking
for over 20 years accounting for 54.8% of ALD cases, and the average daily alcohol
intake was 146.6 g.[7] Indeed, there were extensive studies on the liver injury induced by alcohol. Existing
studies have elucidated the pathogenesis of ALD occurrence is closely related to alcohol
and its genetic and epigenetic factors, metabolite-induced oxidative stress, metabolic
reprogramming, immune damage, and dysbiosis of the gut microbiota.[8] However, in clinical practice, liver injury is rarely caused by alcohol alone but
by a combination of multiple factors.[9] About 59.5% of ALD patients were current or former smokers, and 18.7% were complicated
with hepatitis virus infection.[7] Growing evidence supports that genetic factor, unhealthy lifestyle, and environmental
modifier effects are additional risk factors related to liver injury in ALD.[9]
[10] For example, an HFD can exacerbate the accumulation of fat in the liver, leading
to steatosis, which is a precursor to ALD.[11] Simultaneously, an HFD increases the likelihood of developing obesity. Obesity is
also recognized as one of the susceptibility factors of ALD and contributes to the
progression of liver injury.[12]
[13] Moreover, smoking, as a common detrimental habit in daily life, has been identified
as a significant risk factor for a wide range of diseases. Some studies have indicated
that it can synergistically interact with alcohol, exacerbating liver injury.[14] Additionally, the combination of alcohol consumption with medication administration
or viral infections, particularly hepatitis C virus (HCV), represents a significant
risk factor for the development of ALD.[15]
[16] The aforementioned factors, combined with alcohol consumption, are very likely to
occur in everyday life. Therefore, abstinence from alcohol and lifestyle adjustments
are crucial for controlling and preventing the progression of ALD. Regarding treatment
modalities, pharmacotherapy, nutritional support, and liver transplantation are extensively
employed in ALD management.[6] Collectively, focusing on the synergistic effects of alcohol with additional risk
factors is beneficial for further understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms
of ALD, thus enabling better prevention and treatment of ALD.
Experimental animal models of ALD have been used extensively to simulate human ALD.[17] Among these ALD models, rodent models are the most commonly used animal models to
study ALD.[18] In the past few decades, numerous rodent models have been established to investigate
the impact of acute and chronic alcohol exposure on the occurrence and progression
of ALD.[17] Commonly used rodent models include the Gao-binge model, the acute binge ethanol
feeding model, the Lieber–DeCarli model, and the Tsukamoto–French model.[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24] With the development of technology, more and more in vitro models for studying ALD
have been established, such as hepatocyte culture models, liver organoid models, and
Liver-on-chip models ([Table 1]). These in vitro models can complement ALD models, thereby furthering our understanding
of key developments and pathological mechanisms.[23]
[25] However, our current understanding of human liver disease still primarily comes
from animal models. Traditional ALD models primarily aimed to simulate the diverse
patterns of alcohol consumption and their effects on the liver. Often, they only considered
alcohol as the single hepatotoxic factor, which clearly diverged from the multifactorial
nature of most real-life cases of human liver injury. In recent years, the use of
rodent models to research the synergistic effects of alcohol plus additional risk
factors on liver injury has gained increasing interest. In this review, we discuss
several representative studies that utilize rodent models to investigate the synergistic
liver injury caused by alcohol plus additional risk factors.
Table 1
ALD models
Models
|
Modeling method
|
Characteristic
|
Reference
|
In vivo model
|
Gao-binge model
|
Chronic ethanol feeding (10 days or longer) plus a single binge or multiple binges
|
Convenient and cost-effective
Flexible application
Marked elevation of ALT, AST, and steatosis
No fibrosis and end-stage injuries
|
[19]
|
Acute binge ethanol feeding model
|
Gavaged ethanol feeding by weight (4–6 g/kg)
|
Convenient and cost-effective
Significantly affect liver mitochondrial function
Only cause a mild increase in serum ALT and AST levels
|
[20]
[21]
|
Lieber–DeCarli model
|
Chronic ethanol feeding (4–12 weeks)
|
Convenient and cost-effective
Short-term feeding with no mortality rate
Limited severity of ALD progression
No circumvention of the animal's aversion to ethanol
|
[22]
|
Tsukamoto–French model
|
Intragastric infusion (2–3 months)
|
Marked elevation of ALT, AST, and steatosis
Overcoming the animal's aversion to ethanol
Requirement for intensive medical care
|
[23]
[24]
|
In vitro model
|
Cell culture model
|
Hepatic parenchymal or nonparenchymal cells cultured in vitro and stimulated with
ethanol
|
Convenient and cost-effective
Lack of tissue microenvironment and cell–cell interactions
|
[23]
|
Hepatic organoid model
|
Human pluripotent stem cells cultured in vitro and stimulated with ethanol
|
Provides a similar in vivo microenvironment
|
[23]
|
Liver-on-chip model
|
Ethanol treatment on a biomimetic Liver-Chip
|
Reproduce hepatocellular environment and cell–cell interactions
Achieve basic liver functions
|
[23]
[25]
|
Abbreviations: ALD, alcohol-associated liver disease; ALT, alanine aminotransferase;
AST, aspartate aminotransferase.
Rodent Model of EtOH Plus Additional Risk Factors for ALD
Rodent Model of EtOH Plus Additional Risk Factors for ALD
In recent years, research on ALD has combined alcohol consumption with various additional
risk factors to establish novel ALD models. These novel ALD models can emulate the
conditions of the human liver in reality, allowing us to observe more pronounced liver
injury caused by the combination of factors. Concurrently, these ALD models help identify
new targets for liver injury and enhance our understanding of the interaction mechanisms
between alcohol and other risk factors. In this section, we review several selected
rodent models of ALD induced by alcohol consumption plus additional risk factors,
which we refer to as EtOH + “X.” The modeling methods, liver injury indicators, and
characteristics of these EtOH + “X” models are shown in [Table 2].
Table 2
EtOH + X models
Factors
|
Animals
|
Modeling method
|
Phenomena and indicators
|
Characteristic
|
Reference
|
EtOH + HCV infection
|
9 months old male and female HCV/Sod2+/− mice
|
1. Ethanol feeding at 6 to 9 months old
2. Ethanol-containing Lieber–DeCarli diet for 3 weeks
|
• Hepatic steatosis
•↑Hepatocyte ballooning
•↑ALT
•↑ICAM-1
• Necrosis and neutrophilic infiltration
•↑TUNEL positivity
|
Simulates combined effects of ethanol and HCV infection exacerbates liver injury
|
[29]
|
EtOH + Circadian rhythm disruption (Genetic)
|
7–9 weeks old male
ClockΔ19/Δ19 mutant mice (C57BL/6J coisogenic)
|
1. Constant 12:12 LD cycle
2. A gradual 2-week increase in ethanol (0–29% total calories)
3. 8 weeks on the full ethanol diet (29% total calories)
|
•↑Liver/body weight ratio
•↑Intestinal permeability
•↑LPS
•↑Liver steatosis
•↑Hepatocyte ballooning
|
Mutations in circadian rhythm–related genes exacerbate chronic ethanol-induced liver
injury
|
[35]
|
EtOH + Circadian rhythm disruption (Environmental)
|
7–9 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice
|
1. Once weekly 12-hour phase shift in LD cycle
2. A gradual 2-week increase in ethanol (0–29% total calories)
3. 8 weeks on the full alcohol diet (29% total calories)
|
•↑Liver/body weight ratio
•↑Intestinal permeability
•↑LPS
•↑Hepatic steatosis
•↑Hepatocyte ballooning
• Lobular inflammation
|
The phase shift of the circadian rhythm cycle exacerbates chronic alcohol-induced
liver injury
|
[35]
|
EtOH + ALDH2 deficiency
|
8–10 weeks old male ALDH2−/− mice
|
1. Liquid diet containing 4% ethanol for 4 weeks
2. The administration of a liquid diet containing 4% ethanol and the intraperitoneal
injection of CCl4 (0.1 mL/kg body weigh) twice per week for 8 weeks
|
•↑MAA
•↓Hepatic steatosis
•↓Hepatic triglycerides
•↓ALT and AST
• Inflammatory cell infiltrate
•↑α-SMA
•↑TGF-β and TIMP-1
|
ALDH2 deficiency resists ethanol-induced steatosis and ALT/AST elevation but exacerbates
liver inflammation and fibrosis
|
[39]
|
EtOH + LA
|
8 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice and
Alox15 gene knockout male mice
|
1. USF-enriched diet with ethanol (5% w/v) for 10 days
2. A single dose of ethanol (20% v/v) gavaged by weight (5 g/kg)
|
•↑Liver/body weight ratio
• Hepatic steatosis
•↑ALT (lower in Alox15−/−)
•↑9- and 13-HODEs (OXLAM levels)
|
Convenient and cost-effective
Simulated combined effects of ethanol and high
LA diet exacerbates liver injury
|
[47]
|
EtOH + Smoking
|
8–10 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice and cyp2a5−/− female mice
|
1. Liquid ethanol diet (gradual increase of ethanol every 3 days from 10% of total
calories to 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35%)
2. Nicotine hydrogen tartrate salt (65 μM) or cotinine (52 μM) in diet Duration: 18
days
|
•↑liver TG (lower in cyp2a5−/−)
• Macro-vesicular lipid droplets
(lower in cyp2a5−/−)
•↑ALT
•↓Liver glutathione content
•↑Oxidative stress (lower in cyp2a5−/−)
|
High relevance to human diseases
Only nicotine is used to simulate smoking
|
[54]
|
ETOH + APAP
|
8 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice and p38γ KD male mice
|
1. Liquid diet containing EtOH (5% v/v) for 10 days
2. Ethanol (25%,v/v) gavage according to weight (6 g/kg)
3. Intraperitoneal injection of APAP (200 mg/kg ip.)
|
• Hepatic steatosis (lower in p38γ KD)
•↑Lipid accumulation
•↑ALT and AST
• Inflammatory cell infiltrate(lower in p38γ KD)
•↑Oxidative stress (lower in p38γ KD)
•↑Dlg1 expression (only in p38γ KD)
|
Highly relevant to human disease
EtOH and APAP co-administration synergistically exacerbate liver injury
|
[63]
|
EtOH + Vitamin D deficiency
|
10 weeks old female C57BL/6J mice
|
1. Fed with VtDD diet with ethanol (2.5%)
2. Intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 twice a week by weight (1 mL/kg) Duration: 8 weeks
|
• Hemorrhagic liver necrosis
•↑ALT and AST
• Inflammatory cell infiltrate
•↑Oxidative stress
•↑TUNEL positivity
•↑α-SMA
•↑COL-1 matrix deposition
|
Vitamin D deficiency exacerbates ethanol-induced liver fibrosis
|
[71]
|
Abbreviations: ALDH2, aldehyde dehydrogenase 2; Alox15, arachidonate lipoxygenase
15; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APAP, acetaminophen; HCV, hepatitis C virus; ICAM-1,
intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1; LA, linoleic acid; LD, light–dark; LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
MAA, malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; TIMP-1, tissue
inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP
nick end labeling; USF, unsaturated fat; VtDD, vitamin D-deficient diet; α-SMA, α
smooth muscle actin.
EtOH Plus HCV Infection
HCV is a small, enveloped virus with a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome.[26] This virus can cause acute or chronic hepatitis, which can progress to cirrhosis
and HCC, posing a life-threatening risk.[27] According to the WHO, it is estimated that there are approximately 50 million people
worldwide with chronic HCV infection, with around 1 million new cases occurring each
year. HCV infection and ALD, either alone or in combination, account for more than
two-thirds of all liver disease patients in the Western world; hence, the relationship
between alcohol consumption and HCV infection has always been a focal point of investigation.[28] In the study conducted by Tumurbaatar et al investigating the exacerbation of liver
injury by ethanol plus HCV infection, HCV transgenic mice (SL-139 line) generated
on a C57BL/6J background were used for modeling. These mice were a hemizygous model
and expressed HCV structural proteins (core, E1, E2, and p7) in hepatocytes under
control of the murine albumin enhancer/promoter. To maximize the chance of observing
an oxidative liver injury, the mice were crossed with the superoxide dismutase+/− (Sod2+/−) mice to produce the HCV/Sod2+/− genotype. HCV/Sod2+/− mice were used for ethanol feeding at 6 to 9 months old. And then the mice were fed
an ethanol-containing Lieber–DeCarli diet. The ethanol concentration was increased
stepwise to 1.6, 3.2, 4.8, and finally to 6.4% (v/v) at 3-day intervals and maintained.
The ethanol concentration process lasted for 3 weeks to complete the model. As expected,
histological analyses indicated exacerbated hepatocyte ballooning and serum biochemical
analyses indicated increased ALT level. Further protein and gene expression analyses
indicated elevated intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression and
heightened terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL)
positivity, suggesting an exacerbation of inflammatory response and apoptosis, respectively.[29]
This study also verified whether forkhead box O 3 (FoxO3) has a protective effect
against ethanol-induced liver injury. FoxO3 is a transcription factor known for its
role in cellular metabolism, apoptosis, and response to stress that can be altered
by HCV.[30] Under physiological conditions, hepatic exposure to ethanol triggers the phosphorylation
of FoxO3 at S-574. Subsequently, approximately 10% of Kupffer cells undergo apoptosis.
These apoptotic bodies interact with proinflammatory Ly6C+ infiltrating macrophages
recruited to the liver due to alcohol exposure. This interaction induces delayed differentiation
of infiltrating macrophages, thereby facilitating augmented tissue repair and a mitigated
inflammatory phenotype.[31] The experiment conducted by Tumurbaatar et al indicated that both HCV infection
and ethanol treatment activate FoxO3. However, the combination of HCV and ethanol
suppressed this transcription factor, reducing the expression of cell-protective genes
and leading to more severe liver injury. Complementary experiments using Huh7.5 cells,
which support the entire life cycle of HCV infection and metabolize alcohol through
alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), further confirmed that although HCV and alcohol individually
activate FoxO3, their combination inhibits its function. In the EtOH plus HCV infection
model, more pronounced liver injury was observed in FoxO3−/− mice compared with wild-type (WT) mice.[29] Additionally, in another study, acute ethanol-treated FoxO3−/− mice exhibited decreased expression of autophagy-related genes but increased steatosis
and liver injury.[32] Given these findings, FoxO3-mediated autophagy-related gene expression has a protective
effect against ethanol-induced liver injury. FoxO3 has the potential to become an
important target for treating liver injury induced by ethanol plus HCV infection.
In summary, the EtOH plus HCV infection model successfully simulated the combined
effects of ethanol and HCV infection on the liver. However, some more pronounced liver
injury was only observed in Sod2 heterozygous knockout mice, which are sensitive to
mitochondrial stress.[33] Therefore, the relevance of EtOH plus HCV infection model to human disease still
needs further study.
EtOH Plus Circadian Rhythm Disruption
EtOH Plus Circadian Rhythm Disruption
The circadian rhythm is an approximately 24-hour biological clock cycle within organisms,
which influences various physiological behaviors such as sleep, wakefulness, and feeding,
and is closely associated with metabolic balance.[34] Therefore, when the circadian rhythm is disrupted, this may lead to a series of
health problems. For the purpose of further exploring whether disruption of circadian
rhythms exacerbates ethanol-induced liver injury, experiments were conducted by Summa
et al, who perturbed the circadian rhythm of mice genetically or environmentally.
The study of genetic circadian rhythm disruption utilized homozygous mice with the
ClockΔ19 gene mutation, which were generated through chemical mutagenesis in C57BL/6J mice.
These 7 to 9 weeks old male ClockΔ19/Δ19 mutant mice were maintained on a constant 12:12 light–dark (LD) cycle for the duration
of the experiment. The ClockΔ19/Δ19 mutant mice were fed with gradually increasing amounts of ethanol (from 0 to 29%
of total calories) for 2 weeks, and then maintained on a full ethanol diet (29% of
total calories; 4.5% v/v) for an additional 8 weeks. Meanwhile, 7 to 9 weeks old male
C57BL/6J mice underwent a once weekly shift in the LD cycle of 12 hours for 12 weeks
to achieve environmental disruption of circadian rhythms. These mice were fed following
the same regimen as ClockΔ19/Δ19 mice. Upon completion of the model, subsequent results analysis indicated that both
groups of experimental mice exhibited a higher liver/body weight ratio, more severe
hepatocyte ballooning, steatosis, and increased hepatic inflammation.[35] Overall, both genetic and environmental disruption of circadian rhythms can exacerbate
ethanol-induced liver injury in mice.
Notably, by administering sucralose to mice and measuring the sucralose content in
their urine over 5 hours, it was found that mice with disrupted circadian rhythms
exhibited increased intestinal permeability, particularly in the colon. Additionally,
mice fed with ethanol exhibited significant endotoxemia and inflammation, which may
be one of the reasons for exacerbating liver injury.[35] This model preliminarily confirmed that circadian rhythm disruption might be one
of the risk factors for ALD. However, to discuss some mechanistic issues, such as
the changes in the microbiome induced by circadian rhythm disruption and their impact
on ethanol-induced liver injury, further research is needed.
EtOH Plus ALDH2 Deficiency
EtOH Plus ALDH2 Deficiency
ALDH2 is one of the most crucial enzymes in the alcohol metabolism pathway. In this
pathway, it catalyzes the conversion of acetaldehyde produced during alcohol metabolism
into acetic acid.[36] Therefore, ALDH2 deficiency can lead to poor metabolism of acetaldehyde after alcohol
consumption, resulting in its accumulation in the body and subsequent toxicity.[37] Studies have shown that ALDH2 deficiency is usually caused by the variant ALDH2*2
allele, which has been identified as one of the most common genetic enzymopathies
in human. Approximately 8% of the global population exhibits a deficiency in ALDH2.
In East Asia, this figure rises dramatically to between 40 and 50%.[38]
[39] Therefore, the impact of ALDH2 deficiency on ethanol-induced liver injury is worthy
of attention. In the study by Kwon et al, 8 to 10 weeks old male ALDH2−/− mice were first fed a liquid diet containing 4% ethanol for 4 weeks. Subsequently,
the mice were fed a liquid diet with 4% ethanol, and concurrently received intraperitoneal
injections of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) (0.1 mL/kg body weight) twice a week for 8 weeks, to complete the model. Histological
examination of the liver unsurprisingly revealed that compared with WT mice, the ALDH2−/− mice had higher levels of malondialdehyde-acetaldehyde (MAA) in the liver. Notably,
ALDH2−/− mice exhibited lower hepatic levels of triglycerides and a lower degree of liver
steatosis. However, after ethanol and CCl4 treatment, ALDH2−/− mice show accelerated liver fibrosis. Serum biochemical analysis also indicated that
ALDH2−/− mice had lower levels of ALT and AST. Additionally, immunological as well as protein
and gene expression analyses showed that ALDH2−/− mice exhibit an intensified immune response, as evidenced by significantly elevated
levels of cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6).[39] Overall, the possible mechanism is that ethanol treatment leads to the accumulation
of MAA adducts in the livers of ALDH2−/− mice. MAA stimulates Kupffer cells to produce proinflammatory cytokines, exacerbating
inflammation and promoting liver fibrosis. IL-6 also activates signal transducer and
activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in hepatocytes, subsequently upregulating the
expression of antioxidative stress genes and downregulating the expression of fatty
acid synthesis genes, thereby reducing hepatocellular damage and steatosis.
It is worth noting that the EtOH plus ALDH2 deficiency model included the addition
of an extra stimulus CCl4, which is commonly used to induce liver fibrosis.[40] Because more than 95% of human heavy drinkers develop fatty liver, and up to 35%
of them progress to more severe forms of ALD, including liver fibrosis.[41] So, the combined use of CCl4 and ethanol can effectively accelerate the process of liver fibrosis in mice, allowing
researchers to observe significant fibrotic changes and more severe inflammatory responses
in a shorter period of time. However, using ethanol alone may not be sufficient to
induce significant liver fibrosis in a short period.[42] A study has shown similarities in terms of steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis patterns,
and gene transcript correlation between ethanol-induced human liver injury and CCl4 plus ethanol-induced liver injury in mice.[43] Additionally, a lower dose of CCl4 (e.g., 0.08 mL/kg, twice a week for 8 weeks) can still induce significant liver fibrosis
with a lower mortality rate.[44] In summary, after intraperitoneal injections of CCl4, the model overcame the lack of obvious liver fibrosis in ALDH2−/− mice fed with ethanol alone, which might be due to the short treatment duration.
EtOH Plus Linoleic Acid
Linoleic acid (LA) is a polyunsaturated fatty acid that is widely found in vegetable
oils. Although it is an essential fatty acid required by the body in moderate amounts,
excessive intake may have adverse health effects.[45] Existing research indicates that the intake of unsaturated fatty acids in the diet
has a significant impact on ethanol-induced liver injury.[46] Therefore, diets rich in LA are considered in conjunction with alcohol consumption
to investigate the exacerbation of liver injury caused by the combination of alcohol
and diets high in unsaturated fatty acids. In an experiment conducted by Warner et
al, 8 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice were fed a diet rich in unsaturated fatty acids,
which is supplemented with corn oil, a rich source of LA, along with a diet containing
ethanol (5% w/v) for 10 days. On day 11, the mice were given a single dose of ethanol
(20% v/v, 5 g/kg) by gavage. After 9 hours of gavage, the mice were sacrificed, and
the liver tissue and blood were collected for subsequent analysis. Liver histological
analysis revealed hepatic steatosis, and serum biochemical analysis showed elevated
ALT levels. Meanwhile, protein and gene expression analyses showed that the levels
of inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and oxidative stress
markers, such as thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS), increased, confirming
the exacerbation of inflammation and oxidative stress. The noteworthy observation
was the increase in oxidized linoleic acid metabolite (OXLAM) levels, specifically
9-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (9-HODE) and 13-HODEs. These compounds are oxidized
derivatives of LA and play a role in inflammation and oxidative stress.[47]
Further research in this study indicates that a potential therapeutic target through
which LA exacerbates liver injury is arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase (Alox15), which
is a member of the lipoxygenase family and is primarily responsible for catalyzing
the oxidation of various fatty acids.[48] For example, arachidonic acid can be metabolized by Alox15 into various eicosanoids
with either pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects; thus, Alox15 is associated
with the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases.[49]
[50] Furthermore, in human body, Alox15 is expressed in various cell types and organs
and is associated with multiple diseases, including atherosclerosis, hypertension,
diabetes, obesity, and neurodegenerative diseases.[50] In the EtOH plus LA model, Alox15 knockdown (KD) mice were used in the experiment
and exhibited reduced liver injury. This could be associated with the role of Alox15
in oxidizing LA into OXLAMs.[47]
[51] OXLAMs can induce mitochondrial dysfunction in mice livers, leading to hepatocyte
apoptosis and mediating macrophage pro-inflammatory responses.[52] However, currently there are no specific arachidonate lipoxygenase (Alox) inhibitors
that lack nonspecific antioxidant properties.[50] Therefore, further research is needed to develop and test pharmacological inhibitors
specific to Alox, to use them for therapeutic interventions in human diseases especially
in ALD.
This model is convenient and cost-effective. It combines a high LA diet with the Gao-binge
model to induce human-like moderately severe ethanol-induced liver injury. Additionally,
the study tested the hypothesis that OXLAM-mediated pro-inflammatory responses in
the liver exacerbate ethanol-induced liver injury and suggested that Alox15 could
be a potential therapeutic target for ALD.
EtOH Plus Smoking
Like alcohol consumption, smoking is a global health issue that threatens human health.
Approximately 40% of liver disease patients have a history of smoking, and an increasing
number of studies are investigating the potential impact of smoking on chronic liver
disease.[53] In the experiment conducted by Chen et al, 8 to 10 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice
were fed the control liquid dextrose diet for 3 days to acclimate them to the liquid
diet. Then these mice were fed liquid ethanol diet to induce ALD, and the ethanol
concentration in the liquid diet was increased from 10% of the total calories (1.77%
v/v) to 15% (2.65 v/v), 20% (3.53 v/v), 25% (4.42 v/v), 30% (5.31 v/v), and finally
35% (6.2% v/v) every 3 days. Nicotine hydrogen tartrate salt was mixed in the liquid
at 65 μM (30 mg/L) or cotinine was mixed in the liquid diet at 52 μM (9 mg/L) because
approximately 80% of nicotine is metabolized to cotinine. The entire feeding lasted
18 days. The subsequent histological examination of the liver revealed aggravated
liver injury. Moreover, the increase in markers such as ALT and oxidative stress levels
indicated by TBARS, malondialdehyde (MDA), and 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) also demonstrated
this.[54] In summary, compared with mice fed only a liquid alcohol diet, the addition of nicotine
or cotinine significantly exacerbated liver injury in the mice.
One of the key roles behind this exacerbation of liver injury involves the cytochrome
P450 enzyme CYP2A5, a member of the P450 superfamily in mice, which shares a high
degree of similarity with human CYP2A6. CYP2A5 is involved in various toxicological
reactions, including the metabolism of nicotine, aflatoxin B1, and numerous other
exogenous and endogenous substances.[55] Moreover, studies have shown that alcohol consumption can increase the levels of
CYP2A5 in the liver of mice.[56] Therefore, CYP2A5 has been investigated for its potential role in mediating the
effects of alcohol consumption and the subsequent liver injury.[57] In the model of EtOH plus smoking, CYP2A5 gene of mice were knockout, resulting
in cyp2a5−/−mice, which showed reduced liver injury. This is because CYP2A5 metabolized nicotine
or cotinine and produced reactive oxygen species (ROS). CYP2A5 was mainly located
in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), so the ROS produced in the ER could attack proteins,
leading to the accumulation of unfolded and misfolded proteins in the ER, resulting
in ER stress. Under oxidative stress and ER stress, misfolded apolipoprotein B could
be retained in the ER, leading to the accumulation of fat in the liver. Taken together,
nicotine-induced oxidative stress and ethanol-induced oxidative stress may synergize,
exacerbating alcohol-associated steatotic liver disease.[54] Consequently, although CYP2A5 shows promise as a therapeutic target, a comprehensive
understanding of its role and efficacy in treating ALD and liver injury induced by
multiple factors needs further research.
This model is highly relevant to human disease and clinical research because smoking
and alcohol consumption are major threats to human health and often occur in the same
patients. In establishing this model, the main components of tobacco, nicotine and
its metabolite cotinine, were used to simulate smoking. However, it might be better
if other major toxic substances in cigarettes, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs), including the potent carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene as well as tobacco-specific
nitrosamines, were also considered.[58]
EtOH Plus Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen (APAP) is a widely used antipyretic and analgesic agent.[59] Although adverse reactions to APAP are typically mild, it possesses hepatotoxic
properties and can cause severe liver injury, particularly in cases of overdose.[60]
[61] An overdose of APAP leads to 56,000 to 80,000 emergency room visits, 26,000 to 34,000
hospitalizations, and an estimated 500 deaths annually in the United States of America.[62] Hence, we incorporated APAP as a risk factor for liver injury in rodent models of
ALD to simulate the exacerbation of liver injury induced by the combination of alcohol
and APAP. In our experiment, 8 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice were used as model animals.
After a 5-day liquid diet adaptation stage, mice were fed a Lieber–DeCarli liquid
diet containing 5% ethanol for 10 days. Subsequently, these mice were gavaged 25%
ethanol by weight (6 g/kg), along with an intraperitoneal injection of APAP (200 mg/kg).
After 9 hours, the mice were sacrificed and processed into specimens for subsequent
analysis and research purposes. Histological examination of the liver revealed increased
levels of microsteatosis, macrosteatosis, and hepatocyte ballooning. Simultaneously,
serum biochemical analysis revealed a marked increase in levels of AST and ALT, along
with intensified oxidative stress, primarily reflected in the increased levels of
MDA and decreased glutathione (GSH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) expression. Furthermore,
elevated levels of inflammatory factors such as TNF-α and IL-6 suggested an aggravation
of inflammation.[63]
Next, we validated the role of p38γ in ethanol plus APAP-induced liver injury. p38γ
is an encoded member of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and is crucial
for various cellular processes, including the response to stress and inflammation.[64] Existing research has shown that p38γ can influence the activity of various transcription
factors and other proteins involved in metabolic processes. For example, it influences
the expression of genes associated with lipid metabolism, which is frequently disrupted
in ALD.[65] In our EtOH plus APAP model, p38γ KD mice were made by slowly injecting AAV9-packaged
p38γ KD plasmids via tail vein injection. In p38γ KD mice, reduced liver injury and
elevated levels of discs large homolog 1 (Dlg1) were observed compared with WT mice.[63] Furthermore, we found that Dlg1 could be combined with p38γ. Therefore, p38γ plays
a critical role in the regulation of Dlg1, affecting the severity of liver injury
induced by ethanol plus APAP. Indeed, recent studies have identified therapeutic strategies
involving the modulation of p38γ activity to mitigate ethanol-induced liver injury.
For instance, compounds like scutellarin and boswellic acid can target this pathway,
reducing liver injury due to alcohol.[66]
[67] With a further understanding of p38γ in the pathogenesis of ALD, the development
of therapeutic strategies targeting this site has considerable prospects.
Based on the Gao-binge model, we prepared an EtOH plus APAP model by intraperitoneally
injecting APAP into mice to increase clinical relevance. We also used p38γ KD mice
to verify whether p38γ affects ethanol plus APAP-induced liver injury. This EtOH plus
APAP model is convenient and cost-effective, but the severity of ALD induced is relatively
limited, such as the inability to observe fibrosis. Therefore, the EtOH plus APAP
model has limitations in simulating ALD progression and discussing deeper mechanisms.
EtOH Plus Vitamin D Deficiency
EtOH Plus Vitamin D Deficiency
Vitamin D is a general term for cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and ergocalciferol (vitamin
D2), which play a crucial role in regulating the metabolism of calcium and phosphate.[68] Moreover, studies have shown that vitamin D deficiency is common in patients with
chronic liver disease. Severe vitamin D deficiency is strongly associated with liver
dysfunction and the severity of the disease.[69] So, ethanol-induced liver injury is also considered to be associated with vitamin
D deficiency.[70] For further study, Shibamoto et al adjusted the diet of mice to induce vitamin D
deficiency and established a model of synergistic liver injury caused by vitamin D
deficiency plus alcohol consumption. To establish an animal model of ALD-related liver
fibrosis, 10 weeks old female C57BL/6J mice were fed a Lieber–DeCarli liquid diet
containing 2.5% ethanol and administered CCl4 intraperitoneally twice a week by weight (1 mL/kg). Simultaneously, the mice were
fed a vitamin D–deficient diet (VtDD) for a total duration of 8 weeks. Upon examining
the liver tissue of mice, researchers found that mice given a VtDD in addition to
ethanol administration exhibited hemorrhagic liver necrosis and aggravated liver fibrosis
compared with those given alcohol alone, as also reflected by increased α smooth muscle
actin (α-SMA) and collagen type I (COL-1) matrix deposition. Further analyses indicated
that AST and ALT levels were elevated, and oxidative stress and inflammatory reactions
were exacerbated. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that the combination of ethanol treatment
and VtDD leads to a reduction in the expression of tight junction proteins in the
intestines of mice. This indicates impaired intestinal barrier function, which may
result in dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, leading to an increase in lipopolysaccharides
(LPS) and exacerbating liver injury. In a nutshell, vitamin D deficiency may exacerbate
ethanol plus CCl4–induced liver fibrosis through hepatic oxidative stress and LPS-mediated pro-inflammatory
responses. Additionally, vitamin D deficiency may worsen hepatic pathology due to
gut barrier disruption and exacerbation of LPS portal translocation.[71]
This EtOH plus vitamin D deficiency model introduced the fibrosis inducer CCl4 during the animal feeding stage, resulting in late-stage liver inflammation and fibrosis
in mice. It was confirmed that vitamin D deficiency exacerbates the development of
liver fibrosis in ALD mice. Additionally, studies on this model compellingly demonstrated
that vitamin D deficiency–induced disruption of the intestinal barrier is closely
related to ethanol-induced liver injury.
MetALD and Experimental Models
MetALD and Experimental Models
Metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD) is a new term used
to describe patients with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease
(MASLD) with moderate to excessive alcohol consumption.[72] MASLD is often closely associated with obesity and other metabolic disorder risk
factors.[73] Therefore, liver injury in MetALD patients is influenced by multiple factors, including
alcohol consumption. Currently, many teams are actively developing experimental models
for MetALD. Additionally, some previously established models also align with MetALD,
and these models are reviewed in this section ([Table 3]).
Table 3
MetALD model
Factors
|
Animals
|
Modeling method
|
Phenomena and indicators
|
Characteristic
|
Reference
|
EtOH + Obesity
|
12 weeks old
male
ob/ob mice (C57BL/6-J-Rj-ob)
|
1. The PUFA diet supplement with ethanol (27.5% of total calories) for 4 weeks (once
a day)
|
•↑Liver/body weight ratio • Hepatic steatosis
•↑Hepatic fat accumulation
•↑ALT and AST
|
Convenient and cost-effective
The severity of liver injury is limited
|
[78]
|
ETOH + Fast food
|
5–6 weeks old
male
C57BL/6J mice
|
1. An FF diet (20% fat, 2% cholesterol, and sucrose 34% by weight)
2. High fructose (42.2 g/L)
3. Ethanol administered orally on alternate days (weekly exponential rise from 7.9
to 39.5 g)
Duration: 8 weeks
|
•↓AFI • Hepatomegaly
•↑Serum glucose
•↑Total cholesterol
•↑ALT and AST • Inflammatory cell infiltrate
•↑Oxidative stress
•↑α-SMA and TIMP-1
|
High relevance to human diseases
Only mild liver fibrosis
|
[84]
|
Acute EtOH binge + HFD
|
8–10 weeks old male ICR mice
|
1. HFD (60 kcal% fat) for 12 weeks
2. A single dose of ethanol (5 g/kg body weight) on the last day of HFD feeding
|
• Hepatic steatosis
•↑ALT and AST • Inflammatory cell infiltrate
•↑Oxidative stress
|
Recapitulates major hepatic phenotypes of ALD Acute ethanol binge has limitations
to ALD development
|
[86]
|
Chronic EtOH binge + Western diet
|
8 weeks old male
C57BL/6J mice
|
1. Free access to a Western diet (40 kcal% fat, 20 kcal% fructose, and 2% cholesterol)
for 4 weeks
2. 5% ethanol ad libitum, and weekly gavage with ethanol (2.5 g/kg body weight) for
another 8 weeks
|
• Hepatic steatosis
•↑Hepatic TG
•↑ALT • Inflammatory cell infiltrate
•↑Oxidative stress
|
Simulates human dietary habits and chronic drinking patterns
High relevance to human diseases
No histological inflammation or fibrosis
|
[88]
|
EtOH plus MASH diet
|
9–10 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice
|
1. A MASH diet (fat 33 g%, cholesterol 10 g%, and sucrose 208.4 g%) for 3 days
2. 5 g/kg ethanol gavage for another 3 days
|
• Hepatic steatosis
•↑ALT and AST
• Inflammatory cell infiltrate
|
Convenient and cost-effective
Only early stages of Met ALD progression
|
[90]
|
Abbreviations: AFI, average food intake; ALD, alcohol-associated liver disease; ALT,
alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; FF, fast food; HFD, high-fat
diet; MASH, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis; MetALD, metabolic and
alcohol related/associated liver disease; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; TG, triglyceride;
TIMP-1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1; α-SMA, α smooth muscle actin.
EtOH Plus Obesity
Obesity, as defined by the WHO and the National Center for Health Statistics, is a
body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2.[74] Obesity is considered a global epidemic and overwhelming evidence indicates that
it is a risk factor for numerous liver diseases, including MASLD, and even HCC.[75]
[76] Moreover, existing research has also already indicated that increased body weight
is associated with histological liver injury in chronic alcohol-associated patients.[77] To further investigate the exacerbation of liver injury in obese individuals consuming
alcohol, a rodent model of EtOH plus obesity was established by Everitt et al. In
this 12 weeks old male C57BL/6-J-Rj-ob mice were used as the model animals.[78] This mouse strain carries a mutation in the gene responsible for producing leptin,
a hormone that regulates appetite and energy balance. So, these mice typically exhibit
characteristics such as weight gain, increased adipose tissue, and insulin resistance,
making them an ideal model for studying obesity and its complications.[79] To establish the model, mice were provided with a polyunsaturated fat control diet
(PUFA; 40% of calories from fat, primarily from corn oil) containing ethanol that
made up 27.5% of their total caloric intake every day, continuing this regimen for
4 weeks. Subsequent histological analysis of liver tissue revealed exacerbated hepatic
steatosis in the mice, and serum biochemical analysis detected elevated levels of
AST and ALT. Furthermore, protein and gene expression analysis revealed a decrease
in Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) mRNA levels, and an increase in mammalian target of rapamycin
(mTOR) levels.[78] Collectively, these indicators suggested that the genetically obese mice are more
susceptible to liver injury from alcohol consumption.
This model uses genetically modified C57BL/6-J-Rj-ob mice fed with a polyunsaturated
fatty acids (PUFA) control diet to simulate obesity-related metabolic disorders. It
is also used to examine the effects of long-term ethanol administration on obese ob/ob
mice and to study the liver lipid metabolism pathways affected by this combination.
However, the severity of liver injury induced by alcohol feeding in this model is
limited, and hepatitis, fibrosis, or cirrhosis cannot be observed.
EtOH Plus Fast Food
Fast food typically refers to food that is pre-prepared and quickly served to customers.
Although fast food offers convenience, most fast food is detrimental to health due
to its high fat, high salt, high sugar, and low fiber content.[80]
[81] A study from the Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California indicated
that among groups of obese or diabetic patients who consumed 20% or more of their
daily calories from fast food, the fat content in the liver significantly increased.[82] Meanwhile, excessive alcohol consumption can also lead to abnormal fat accumulation
in the liver.[83] Therefore, it is meaningful to study the exacerbation of liver injury by combining
fast food diet as a risk factor with alcohol consumption. To gain deeper insights,
Sharma et al conducted a study in which 5 to 6 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice were fed
a diet designed to simulate fast food. The diet contained 20% fat, 2% cholesterol,
and 34% sucrose, and were regularly given high fructose (42.2 g/L) in water. Meanwhile,
these mice were orally administered ethanol diluted in water every other day, with
the weekly dose exponentially rising from 10% v/v (7.9 g) to 50% v/v (39.5 g), over
a period of 8 weeks to complete the modeling process. By recording and analyzing the
food intake of the mice, researchers found that the mice in this model exhibited a
lower average food intake (AFI) compared with mice consuming alcohol alone. Besides,
histological examination of the liver revealed more severe hepatomegaly, microsteatosis,
and macrosteatosis. Serum biochemical analysis revealed significant elevation in levels
of AST and ALT. Further protein and gene expression analysis revealed higher levels
of α smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1),
IL-6, TNF-α, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), indicating a more severe occurrence
of inflammation. Additionally, the increase in TBARS levels and the decrease in SOD-1
indicated an intensification of oxidative stress.[84]
This model gives mice a high-fat, high-sucrose, and high-fructose diet along with
long-term alcohol feeding, causing them to develop progressive steatohepatitis, metabolic
dyslipidemia, and molecular signaling disorders related to oxidative damage, inflammation,
lipogenesis, fibrosis, DNA damage, and apoptosis. This model is helpful for studying
the progression of MetALD and the development of therapeutic drugs.
Acute EtOH Binge Plus HFD
Acute EtOH Binge Plus HFD
High-fat diet (HFD) is considered one of the common factors causing liver injury in
humans and is often used in research to establish MASLD models.[85] Zhan et al established an HFD feeding plus acute EtOH binge model in a study. In
this 8 to 10 weeks old male ICR mice were fed an HFD (60 kcal% fat) for 12 weeks,
and on the last day of HFD feeding, the mice were given a single dose of ethanol (5 g/kg
body weight). After 9 hours of gavage, the mice were sacrificed. Histological analysis
of liver tissue revealed HFD feeding plus ethanol binge caused obvious hepatic steatosis
and lipid droplets. Serum biochemical analysis revealed significant elevation in levels
of AST and ALT. Protein and gene expression analysis revealed the positive staining
of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) around the central vein was
elevated. Notably, under extra ethanol stimulation, the expression of peroxisome proliferators-activated
receptor γ (PPARγ) in the liver of mice significantly decreased, whereas an HFD alone
had no effect. Additionally, the expression of both neutrophil elastase (NE), a marker
of the activated neutrophil, and F4/80, a marker of macrophages, increased, indicating
an exacerbation of the inflammatory response.[86]
The model combines HFD and acute ethanol binge, simulating the condition of MetALD,
which recapitulates major hepatic phenotypes of ALD, including steatosis and steatohepatitis
characterized by neutrophil infiltration, oxidative stress, and ER stress. Meanwhile,
the study explores the feasibility of regulating lipid synthesis by inhibiting SREBP-1
expression and upregulating PPARγ levels, as well as reducing inflammatory responses
by inhibiting P2 × 7 receptor (P2 × 7R) expression.[86] However, although acute EtOH binge can simulate certain clinical conditions, its
pathological mechanisms may differ from those of long-term chronic drinking, which
may limit the broader applicability of the results.[23]
Chronic EtOH Binge Plus Western Diet
Chronic EtOH Binge Plus Western Diet
Both the Western diet and HFD contain high-fat components, but they differ in composition
and health impacts. For example, the Western diet typically also includes high sugar,
high salt, and high calories.[87] Therefore, the Western diet can better simulate certain aspects of modern human
dietary habits, such as the intake of high fat, high sugar, and high calories, when
constructing animal models. This makes the experimental results more relevant to real-world
conditions. Buyco et al established a model with chronic EtOH binge combined with
a high fructose, high fat, and high cholesterol diet. In this 8 weeks old male C57BL/6J
mice were allowed free access to a diet containing 40 kcal% fat, 20 kcal% fructose,
and 2% cholesterol. After 4 weeks, the mice were given ad libitum 5% ethanol in drinking
water and were gavaged with ethanol (2.5 g/kg body weight) weekly for 8 weeks to complete
the modeling. Histological analysis of liver tissue revealed chronic ethanol binge
plus Western diet leads to more severe steatosis compared with alcohol consumption
or a Western diet alone. Serum biochemical analysis revealed significant elevation
of ALT activity and hepatic triglyceride (TG), but lower plasma TG, indicating increased
de novo lipogenesis with TG flux shifted toward storage in hepatic lipid droplets
instead of VLDL secretion during the early stage of injury. Although histological
examination did not reveal discernible inflammation or fibrosis, some inflammatory
markers, such as macrophage-specific protein Cd163, showed increased expression. Meanwhile,
the increased expression of TGF-β indicates that chronic EtOH binge plus Western diet
promotes more pro-fibrotic signaling because TGF-β can stimulate the production and
deposition of extracellular matrix components such as collagen, which are crucial
for the development of fibrosis. The examination of oxidative stress markers such
as heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1) indicates that oxidative stress in this model is primarily
driven by the Western diet. Additionally, mice fed the combined diet showed more glucose
intolerance compared with those fed either diet alone.[88]
In summary, this model closely mimics human dietary habits and chronic drinking patterns,
effectively inducing a range of liver diseases, including steatosis, oxidative stress,
inflammation, and pro-fibrotic signaling. It provides valuable insights for studying
the lipid metabolism disorders commonly seen in metabolic syndrome induced by alcohol
combined with a high-fat, high-sugar diet, as well as the development of glucose intolerance.
However, this model also has its limitations, as it can only simulate the early development
of ALD without histological inflammation or fibrosis.
EtOH Plus MASH Diet
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a liver disease caused
by metabolic disorders. MASH is a severe form of MASLD that can progress to advanced
fibrosis, leading to an increased risk of cirrhosis and HCC, posing a global threat
to human health.[89] Babuta et al established a model involving short-term feeding of a high-fat, high-cholesterol,
and high-sucrose MASH diet combined with short-term alcohol binges to simulate the
early stages of MetALD. In this 9 to 10 weeks old male C57BL/6J mice were given ad
libitum access to a MASH diet (fat 33 g%, cholesterol 10 g%, and sucrose 208.4 g%)
for 3 days. Then the mice received 5 g/kg ethanol gavage for 3 days. The mice were
sacrificed 9 hours after the final binge. Subsequent histological analysis showed
that the mice with ethanol binge plus the MASH diet had exacerbated liver steatosis
compared with either treatment alone. Serum biochemical analysis revealed significant
elevation in levels of AST and ALT. Protein and gene expression analysis revealed
that ethanol binge plus the MASH diet led to the activation of the NOD-like receptor
thermal protein domain associated protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome. This process includes
an increase in the transcript level of NLRP3 and other inflammasome components such
as IL-1β, as well as an increase in the protein level of cleaved caspase-1 and cleaved
IL-1β. Meanwhile, hepatic expression of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (Cxcr1),
Cxcr2, CD11b, as well as the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) by activated
neutrophils, all increased. This indicates that ethanol binge plus the MASH diet induces
the neutrophil recruitment, infiltration, and NETs release in the liver, exacerbating
inflammatory responses.[90]
In summary, this model is convenient and cost-effective, allowing for the observation
of significant liver injury indicators in a short period. Further research emphasizes
the novel role of the NLRP3-IL-1β axis in early MetALD by recruiting monocytes/macrophages
and neutrophils to the liver to propagate inflammation. However, due to the short
feeding duration, it remains limited to the early stages of MetALD progression.
Alcohol-Associated HCC (A-HCC) Model
Alcohol-Associated HCC (A-HCC) Model
Alcohol consumption is a well-established risk factor for HCC; research has shown
that alcohol contributes to an estimated 19% of HCC deaths globally.[83] Compared with HCC from other causes, A-HCC is often diagnosed with more advanced
stage and cirrhosis, partly due to the late diagnosis and lack of tumor screening
in population with ALD. Currently, animal models for A-HCC research are extremely
limited. Some A-HCC mice models use the carcinogen diethylnitrosamine (DEN) combined
with long-term ethanol feeding, but the gene mutations induced by DEN in mice cancers
are rarely found in human HCC. So, the clinical relevance of these models to human
A-HCC is considered questionable.[84]
[85] However, an A-HCC model established by Seo et al using ALDH2-deficient mice is noteworthy.
In this 10 to 12 weeks old male mice were injected intraperitoneally with CCl4 (0.2 mL/kg in olive oil) twice a week for 28 weeks. For the last 10 weeks of the
28-week period, the mice were fed a 4% v/v ethanol-containing Lieber–DeCarli diet.
Hepatic histopathology from these mice showed fibrosis, steatosis, inflammation, hepatocyte
ballooning degeneration, and tumor nodules. Immunohistochemistry analyses detected
the expression of hepatocyte paraffin 1 (HepPar-1), an immunohistochemical marker
of HCC suggesting CCl4 plus EtOH treatment induces HCC. Additionally, studies on ALDH2-deficient mice showed
increased susceptibility to CCl4 + EtOH-induced HCC. The results suggested that after chronic CCl4 and ethanol exposure, ALDH2-deficient hepatocytes produced oxidized mtDNA-enriched
extracellular vesicles (EVs). These oxidized mtDNA-enriched EVs were then transferred
to HCC cells and activated multiple oncogenic pathways, such as c-Jun N-terminal kinase
(JNK) and STAT3.[36] Collectively, this model induces liver fibrosis in ALDH2-deficient mice through
CCl4 administration followed by ethanol feeding, ultimately leading to HCC, serving as
a mice model for studying A-HCC.
Developing better preclinical model is crucial for a deeper understanding of the characteristics,
prevention, and personalized treatment of A-HCC. Although there is currently a lack
of research in this area, A-HCC models such as the CCl4 plus ethanol-induced A-HCC of ALDH2-deficient mice can provide inspiration for future
studies.
Regulatory Mechanisms in the Model
Regulatory Mechanisms in the Model
In cell biology, signaling pathways are essential for transmitting information inside
and among cells. These signaling pathways are involved in regulating a variety of
biological processes such as cell death, proliferation, metabolism, and inflammatory
responses, which are essential for maintaining the normal functions of an organism.
This section introduces the representative signaling pathways involved in alcohol-induced
liver injury and discusses how alcohol combines with other risk factors to influence
these signaling pathways, thereby jointly exacerbating liver injury.
MAPK Signaling Pathway
The MAPK signaling pathway is a crucial set of signal transduction events associated
with various biological processes. It primarily includes the extracellular signal-regulated
kinase (ERK), JNK, and p38 signaling pathway.[91]
[92] Functionally, the ERK signaling pathway tends to promote cell survival and proliferation,
while the JNK and p38 signaling pathway play more significant roles in cellular stress
and apoptosis.[93] Studies have shown that the MAPK signaling pathway plays an important role in liver
injury, particularly the p38 pathway, which has been extensively studied for its role
in hepatic fibrosis.[94]
In the context of liver injury due to alcohol plus APAP administration, the MAPK signaling
pathway has been shown to be a key player ([Fig. 1]).[63] During the metabolism of alcohol in the liver, ROS and acetaldehyde are produced,
which can activate the MAPK signaling pathway. Simultaneously, alcohol metabolites
and ROS may trigger inflammatory responses, further activating the JNK and p38 subfamilies
within the MAPK signaling pathway.[67]
[95] Similarly, APAP is metabolized in the liver into toxic intermediates, such as N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone
imine (NAPQI), which induce oxidative stress and activate the MAPK signaling pathway.[96] Resultantly, the activation of certain members of the MAPK family, such as p38,
can exacerbate alcohol-induced liver injury.[97] In summary, the combined hepatotoxic effects of alcohol and APAP are particularly
concerning, primarily because both substances can independently activate the MAPK
signaling pathway. Their combined effects can overwhelm the protective mechanisms
of liver, leading to severe liver injury or even failure.
Fig. 1
Alcohol plus acetaminophen (APAP) or nicotine exacerbates liver injury through the
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling
pathway. Alcohol exposure causes the liver cell membrane protein NOX4 to produce a large amount
of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Meanwhile, alcohol, APAP, and nicotine can be metabolized
by CYP450 enzymes (such as CYP2E1 and CYP2A5), resulting in the production of significant
amounts of ROS. ROS induces Ask-1-JNK-MKK4/7, or induces p38 through activation of
MKK3/6, collectively leading to apoptosis. In the NF-κB signaling pathway, ROS induces
NF-κB-inducing kinase, which, through IκB kinase, causes the separation of NF-κB from
IκB proteins, allowing NF-κB to enter the nucleus and initiate the transcription of
target genes, thereby promoting the inflammatory response.
Nrf2 Signaling Pathway
The nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathway is a critical
cellular protective mechanism closely related to oxidative stress resistance and inflammation
regulation.[98] Increased levels of ROS stimulate Nrf2 signaling pathway, enhancing the activity
of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, and glutathione peroxidase.[99]
In alcohol-induced liver injury, the Nrf2 signaling pathway is particularly important,
especially the CYP2E1-ROS-Nrf2 signaling pathway.[57] Long-term alcohol consumption can generate a large amount of ROS through various
pathways, including the induction of the CYP2E1 enzyme.[100] At this point, the Nrf2 signaling pathway helps to mitigate this injury by activating
various antioxidant response elements (AREs) that leads to the production of detoxifying
and antioxidant enzymes. Further studies have shown that natural Nrf2 activators can
regulate lipid metabolism and oxidative stress in liver cells, thus helping to alleviate
fatty liver disease caused by alcohol.[101] However, in some cases, the Nrf2 signaling pathway may not be sufficiently activated
in response to alcohol-induced oxidative stress, leading to inadequate antioxidant
defenses and more severe liver injury.[102] Nevertheless, the specific mechanisms require further study. In summary, the Nrf2
signaling pathway is a key player in protecting the liver from alcohol-induced oxidative
stress, making it a potential signaling pathway for therapeutic interventions in ALD.
NF-κB Signaling Pathway
Nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling pathway is a crucial molecular cascade that
regulates a wide range of biological processes, including innate and adaptive immunity,
inflammation, and stress responses.[103] The NF-κB signaling pathway can be mainly classified into the canonical pathway
and the non-canonical pathway. In the canonical pathway, NF-κB forms a complex with
IκB proteins in the resting state, preventing its nuclear translocation. Upon stimulation,
IκB proteins are phosphorylated and degraded, allowing NF-κB to enter the nucleus,
activate gene transcription, and thereby regulate the expression of various pro-inflammatory
genes, serving as a key mediator of inflammatory response. The activation of the non-canonical
NF-κB signaling pathway occurs through a handful of members of the TNF receptor superfamily.
The NF-κB precursor p100 is activated by protein kinase cluster of differentiation
40 (CD40) and ultimately converted into its active form, p52.[103]
The molecular pathomechanism of ALD is primarily rooted in the innate immune system,
particularly associated with the functional enhancement of the NF-κB signaling pathway.[104] Alcohol metabolism generates ROS and other byproducts that can activate the NF-κB
signaling pathway. Concurrently, some additional risk factors can also activate this
signaling pathway, thereby triggering an inflammatory response and exacerbating ALD.
For instance, alcohol-induced endotoxins entering the portal venous circulation from
the gut are believed to play a significant role in the activation of Kupffer cells,
leading to an enhanced release of chemokines, and the deficiency of vitamin D can
exacerbate this process.[71] In summary, these processes are associated with the involvement of the NF-κB signaling
pathway, highlighting its importance in the pathogenesis of liver injury induced by
alcohol and other risk factors.
AMPK Signaling Pathway
Adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP)–activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a crucial enzyme
that acts as an energy sensor in cells, playing a significant role in maintaining
energy homeostasis.[105] Therefore, the AMPK signaling pathway, in which this enzyme participates, emerges
as a pivotal regulator of cellular energy balance. It has been shown to play a significant
role in the pathogenesis of both alcohol-associated and non-alcohol-associated steatotic
liver diseases.[106]
In the experiments conducted by Everitt et al, alcohol significantly increased the
levels of mTOR in ob/ob mice, which is one of the key factors determining the nuclear
retention of lipin-1 in hepatocytes. This, in turn, led to a decrease in SIRT1 and
AMPK levels.[78] SIRT1 is a protein that belongs to the sirtuins family, which is well known for
regulating cellular processes such as aging, transcription, and stress resistance
through deacetylation of proteins.[107] Simultaneously, SIRT1 promotes the oxidation of fatty acids and reduces lipogenesis,
while AMPK activation also favors fatty acid oxidation over synthesis. Furthermore,
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 α (PGC-1α) and lipin-1,
as downstream effects of the impaired SIRT1-AMPK signaling, showed respective decreases
and increases in their levels.[78] Additionally, nuclear-localized lipin-1 forms a complex with PGC-1α/PPARα, leading
to the induction of fatty acid oxidation genes. In conclusion, the aforementioned
processes elucidate how the SIRT1-AMPK signaling pathway may exacerbate alcohol-associated
steatotic liver disease ([Fig. 2]). Therefore, given the role of AMPK signaling pathway in improving lipid metabolism,
reducing inflammation, and enhancing autophagy, therapeutic strategies targeting the
SIRT1-AMPK signaling pathway are actively under investigation.[105]
Fig. 2
Alcohol plus obesity exacerbates liver injury through the
adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway. Alcohol combined with obesity directly inhibits SIRT1 and AMPK, or indirectly inhibits
them by inducing mTOR, thereby activating downstream signals and exacerbating fatty
liver disease (by Figdraw).
Future Prospects and Conclusion
Future Prospects and Conclusion
Historically, rodent models of liver injury in ALD primarily simulated the early stages
of the condition, such as steatosis and moderate steatohepatitis, with alcohol being
the sole pathogenic factor.[16]
[23] This does not align well with the clinical presentation of ALD in humans, where
multiple pathogenic factors are often intertwined. Currently, significant progress
is being made in rodent models of alcohol-induced liver injury, particularly in the
transition from traditional ALD models that focus solely on alcohol-induced liver
injury to those EtOH plus X models that incorporate alcohol with additional risk factors.
This shift in modeling approach is essential for a more comprehensive understanding
of the multifactorial nature of liver injury. Future research should be dedicated
to developing more complex models that not only simulate the intricate interactions
between ethanol and other risk factors such as obesity, diet, metabolic syndrome,
and viral infections, but also accurately reflect the severity and progression of
liver injury in humans.[108]
In the future, research on liver organ tissues has the potential to become a hot topic.
Organoid models represent an advanced in vitro approach that offers a unique three-dimensional
platform, recapitulating the microenvironment of human organs and cell interactions,
thereby approximating the complexity of the structure and function of the human liver.[109]
[110] Moreover, organoid models provide a more physiologically relevant model compared
with traditional rodent models and address the limitations of traditional rodent models,
such as species-specific responses that may not fully translate to human physiology.[111] Currently, a team from China has developed a human embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived,
expandable liver organoid model system that encapsulates the typical features of ALD
pathophysiology.[112] Therefore, the integration of multiple risk factors including genetic predispositions,
dietary habits, and environmental alternations into organoid models is a promising
direction for future research.
Furthermore, new, single-cell sequencing technologies, such as spatial transcriptomics
(ST), have shown great potential in liver injury model research.[113]
[114] ST, which combines gene expression data with spatial information, has rapidly developed
in recent years. Applying this method to liver research has greatly enhanced our understanding
of liver development, regeneration, and disease. Although the field is advancing,
there are still various issues to be addressed, including sensitivity, the ability
to obtain precise single cell information, and data processing methods.[115] In future liver injury research, as liver organoid technology matures, it can be
combined with ST techniques to help us obtain liver injury models that are closer
to reality and allow for more precise and in-depth analysis and study.
From a clinical standpoint, human ALD typically arises from a multitude of risk factors
including alcohol. Therefore, rodent models induced with alcohol plus additional risk
factors for liver injury can more accurately simulate the progression of human ALD.
However, currently, there is a scarcity of such rodent models, making this a highly
promising avenue for research. Simultaneously, improvements in detection techniques
allow us to more accurately pinpoint targets and study signaling pathways. In conclusion,
the application of rodent models that combine alcohol plus additional risk factors
for liver injury is a crucial method for in-depth investigation of the pathology of
alcohol-induced liver injury and the identification of novel therapeutic targets and
strategies. The development and refinement of these EtOH plus X models should be a
focus of future research in this field.