DMP und die Frakturversorgung – Proximale Humerusfrakturen

Zusammenfassung

Proximale Humerusfrakturen zählen zu den häufigsten Indikatorfrakturen einer Osteoporose und treten beim älteren Patienten vor allem nach einem niedrigenergetischen Trauma auf. Neben einer sorgfältigen klinischen Untersuchung ist die Bildgebung (Röntgen/Computertomographie) unerlässlich für die weitere Therapieplanung. Diese kann bei einem älteren Patienten jedoch nicht ausschließlich anhand der klinischen und bildgebenden Befunde erfolgen, es müssen zahlreiche Kontextfaktoren (funktioneller Anspruch, Begleiterkrankungen) beachtet werden. Der Großteil der proximalen Humerusfrakturen, gerade im geriatrischen Patientenkollektiv, wird konservativ behandelt. Bei operativer Versorgung ist im Rahmen der Etablierung alterstraumatologischer Versorgungskonzepte ein Trend zum vermehrten Gelenksersatz zu beobachten. Oberstes Ziel hat die schnellstmögliche Wiederherstellung der Selbstständigkeit und Alltagsfähigkeit des Patienten. Eine operative Versorgung wird daher auch bei bestehenden Komorbiditäten häufiger erwogen und erfolgt bei zunehmender Evidenz mittels inverser Schultergelenksendoprothese. Unabhängig vom gewählten Versorgungspfad ist die sekundäre Frakturprophylaxe im Sinne einer osteologischen Diagnostik und spezifischen Therapie essenziell.

Abstract

Proximal humerus fractures are among the most common indicator fractures of osteoporosis and occur in older patients primarily after low-energy trauma. In addition to a careful clinical examination, diagnostic imaging (radiography/computed tomography) is essential for further treatment planning. However, in an older patient, this cannot be done solely on the basis of clinical and imaging findings; numerous contextual factors (functional demands, concomitant diseases) must be taken into account. The major part of proximal humerus fractures, especially in geriatric patients, is treated conservatively. In surgical treatment increased rates of joint replacement can be observed as part of the establishment of geriatric trauma care concepts. The primary goal is to restore the patient's independence and abilities for daily living as soon as possible. Surgical treatment is therefore considered more frequently even in the case of existing comorbidities and, as evidence increases, is carried out using reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Regardless of the chosen treatment path, secondary fracture preventions with osteological diagnostics and specific therapy is crucial.

Schlüsselwörter

Proximale Humerusfraktur - Indikatorfraktur - inverse Prothese

Keywords

Proximal humerus fracture - indicator fracture - reverse shoulder - arthroplasty

Publication History

Received: 18 June 2024

Accepted: 02 September 2024

Article published online:
20 September 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury 2006; 37: 691-697
• 2 Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012; 64: 407-414
• 3 Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis international: a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2005; 16: S3-S7
• 4 Bahrs C, Stojicevic T, Blumenstock G. et al. Trends in epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of proximal humeral fractures. International orthopaedics 2014; 38: 1697-1704
• 5 Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. The. Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1970; 52: 1077-1089
• 6 Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 1970; 52: 1090-1103
• 7 Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS. et al. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2018; 32: S1-S170
• 8 Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M. et al. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 427-433
• 9 Resch H, Tauber M, Neviaser RJ. et al. Classification of proximal humeral fractures based on a pathomorphologic analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 455-462
• 10 Campochiaro G, Rebuzzi M, Baudi P. et al. Complex proximal humerus fractures: Hertel's criteria reliability to predict head necrosis. Musculoskelet Surg 2015; 99: S9-S15
• 11 Majed A, Macleod I, Bull AM. et al. Proximal humeral fracture classification systems revisited. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: 1125-1132
• 12 Iordens GI, Mahabier KC, Buisman FE. et al. The reliability and reproducibility of the Hertel classification for comminuted proximal humeral fractures compared with the Neer classification. J Orthop Sci 2016; 21: 596-602
• 13 Carbone S, Papalia M. The amount of impaction and loss of reduction in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures after surgical fixation. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 2016; 27: 627-633
• 14 Frank FA, Niehaus R, Borbas P. et al. Risk factors for secondary displacement in conservatively treated proximal humeral fractures. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B 881-889
• 15 Spross C, Kaestle N, Benninger E. et al. Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A Simple Radiographic Tool to Assess Local Bone Quality in Proximal Humerus Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 3038-3045
• 16 Spross C, Zeledon R, Zdravkovic V. et al. How bone quality may influence intraoperative and early postoperative problems after angular stable open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26: 1566-1572
• 17 Papalia AG, Romeo PV, Kingery MT. et al. Trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures from 2010 to 2020. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33: e49-e57
• 18 Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM. et al. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6: CD000434
• 19 Walter N, Szymski D, Kurtz SM. et al. Proximal humerus fractures – epidemiology, comparison of mortality rates after surgical versus non-surgical treatment, and analysis of risk factors based on Medicare registry data. Bone Joint Res 2023; 12: 103-112
• 20 Mellstrand Navarro C, Brolund A, Ekholm C. et al. Treatment of humerus fractures in the elderly: A systematic review covering effectiveness, safety, economic aspects and evolution of practice. PloS one 2018; 13: e0207815
• 21 Lanzetti RM, Gaj E, Berlinberg EJ. et al. Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Demonstrates Better Outcomes Than Angular Stable Plate in the Treatment of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures in Patients Older Than 70 Years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481: 735-747
• 22 Matsumura N, Furuhata R, Seto T. et al. Reproducibility of the modified Neer classification defining displacement with respect to the humeral head fragment for proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15: 438
• 23 Spross C, Meester J, Mazzucchelli RA. et al. Evidence-based algorithm to treat patients with proximal humerus fractures-a prospective study with early clinical and overall performance results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 1022-1032
• 24 Haasters F, Siebenburger G, Helfen T. et al. Complications of locked plating for proximal humeral fractures-are we getting any better?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: e295-303
• 25 Sudkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P. et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume 2009; 91: 1320-1328
• 26 Varga P, Inzana JA, Fletcher JWA. et al. Cement augmentation of calcar screws may provide the greatest reduction in predicted screw cut-out risk for proximal humerus plating based on validated parametric computational modelling: Augmenting proximal humerus fracture plating. Bone Joint Res 2020; 9: 534-542
• 27 Helfen T, Siebenburger G, Fleischhacker E. et al. Operative treatment of 2-part surgical neck type fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: Cement augmented locking plate PHILOS vs. proximal humerus nail multiloc(R). Injury 2020; 51: 2245-2252
• 28 Tong CH, Fang CX. Rehabilitation progress following reverse total shoulder replacement and internal fixation for geriatric three and four-part proximal humerus fractures – a propensity score matched comparison. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24: 566
• 29 Henkelmann R, Hepp P, Mester B. et al. Assessment of Complication Risk in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis of 4019 Patients. J Clin Med 2023; 12
• 30 Lu V, Jegatheesan V, Patel D. et al. Outcomes of acute vs. delayed reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32: 1728-1739
• 31 Fleischhacker E, Gleich J, Smolka V. et al. The Influence of Adherence to Orthosis and Physiotherapy Protocol on Functional Outcome after Proximal Humeral Fracture in the Elderly. J Clin Med 2023; 12
• 32 Haws BE, Samborski SA, Karnyski S. et al. Superior Outcomes With Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty versus Nonoperative Management for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Matched Cohort Analysis. Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2023; 37: e247-e252
• 33 Lopiz Y, Alcobia-Diaz B, Galan-Olleros M. et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment for 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28: 2259-2271
• 34 Stolberg-Stolberg J, Koppe J, Rischen R. et al. The Surgical Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients. Deutsches Arzteblatt international 2021; 118: 817-823