CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(09): E1063-E1064
DOI: 10.1055/a-2405-1170
VidEIO

Detective flow imaging endoscopic ultrasound for locating optimal puncture site for a poorly vascularized pancreatic mass

Yasuo Otsuka
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
,
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
,
Akane Hara
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
,
Yasuhiro Masuta
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
,
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
,
Takaaki Chikugo
2   Department of Pathology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
,
Masatoshi Kudo
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
› Author Affiliations
 

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is an established procedure with high diagnostic accuracy for tissue acquisition and pathological diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [1]. However, EUS-FNB sometimes demonstrates inconclusive results in PDAC rich in necrotic or fibrotic components [2] [3]. In such cases, identifying hot spot areas with viable cancerous cells is important to obtain adequate samples. Detective flow imaging (DFI) is a novel Doppler imaging technology that visualizes low-velocity blood flow in the absence of motion artifacts [4] [5], which was challenging to visualize on conventional color Doppler imaging. Herein, we present a case in which DFI imaging helped determine the hot spot area during EUS-FNB for a poorly vascularized pancreatic mass.

An 85-year-old male patient was referred to our hospital for pancreatic mass evaluation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a large hypodense mass in the pancreatic body and tail with poor contrast enhancement ([Fig. 1]). EUS detected a well-defined heterogeneous mass in the pancreatic body. EUS-FNB was performed using a 22-gauge Franseen needle (Acquire; Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, United States) with three needle passes. However, the acquired materials contained only fibrotic and necrotic components without epithelial cells. Repeated EUS-FNB was required to confirm the diagnosis. Previous EUS-FNB findings indicated that the tumor contained abundant fibrotic tissues; thus, intratumoral vessel evaluation using the DFI was planned. Conventional color Doppler imaging revealed no intratumoral vessels ([Fig. 2] a), whereas DFI imaging demonstrated fine, irregular intratumoral vessels, indicating a hot spot area ([Fig. 2] b). EUS-FNB with DFI guidance was performed using the same needle type against the area where vessels were displayed on DFI ([Fig. 3] a, [Video 1]). The acquired specimen contained cancerous tissue, resulting in a final diagnosis of PDAC ([Fig. 3] b). This case indicates that DFI helps determine the optimal puncture site for diagnosis of poorly vascularized PDAC.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing a large hypodense mass in the pancreatic body and tail with very poor contrast enhancement. a Early phase. b Delayed phase.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 a Conventional color Doppler endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showing no intratumoral vessels. b Detective flow imaging EUS illustrating fine irregular vessels inside the pancreatic mass.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 a EUS-guided tissue acquisition was performed using a Franseen needle on DFI guidance against the area where intratumoral vessels were displayed. b Histopathological evaluation of the acquired specimen demonstrating atypical cell clusters with irregularly sized nuclei, resulting in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosis.

Quality:
Detective flow imaging helps determine the optimal puncture site for poorly vascularized pancreatic mass.Video 1


#

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • References

  • 1 van Riet PA, Erler NS, Bruno MJ. et al. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 411-423
  • 2 Numata K, Ozawa Y, Kobayashi N. et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of pancreatic carcinoma: correlations with pathological findings. J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 631-640
  • 3 Kamata K, Takenaka M, Omoto S. et al. Impact of avascular areas, as measured by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS, on the accuracy of FNA for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 158-163
  • 4 Yamashita Y, Yoshikawa T, Yamazaki H. et al. A novel endoscopic ultrasonography imaging technique for depicting microcirculation in pancreatobiliary lesions without the need for contrast-enhancement: A prospective exploratory study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11: 2018
  • 5 Yamashita Y, Yoshikawa T, Kawaji Y. et al. Novel endoscopic ultrasonography imaging technique for visualizing microcirculation without contrast enhancement in subepithelial lesions: prospective study. Dig Endosc 2021; 33: 955-961

Correspondence

Dr. Kosuke Minaga
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine
377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, 589-8511, Japan
589-8511 Osaka-Sayama
Japan   

Publication History

Received: 20 May 2024

Accepted after revision: 13 June 2024

Article published online:
12 September 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 van Riet PA, Erler NS, Bruno MJ. et al. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy devices for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid lesions: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 411-423
  • 2 Numata K, Ozawa Y, Kobayashi N. et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of pancreatic carcinoma: correlations with pathological findings. J Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 631-640
  • 3 Kamata K, Takenaka M, Omoto S. et al. Impact of avascular areas, as measured by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS, on the accuracy of FNA for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 158-163
  • 4 Yamashita Y, Yoshikawa T, Yamazaki H. et al. A novel endoscopic ultrasonography imaging technique for depicting microcirculation in pancreatobiliary lesions without the need for contrast-enhancement: A prospective exploratory study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11: 2018
  • 5 Yamashita Y, Yoshikawa T, Kawaji Y. et al. Novel endoscopic ultrasonography imaging technique for visualizing microcirculation without contrast enhancement in subepithelial lesions: prospective study. Dig Endosc 2021; 33: 955-961

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing a large hypodense mass in the pancreatic body and tail with very poor contrast enhancement. a Early phase. b Delayed phase.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 a Conventional color Doppler endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) showing no intratumoral vessels. b Detective flow imaging EUS illustrating fine irregular vessels inside the pancreatic mass.
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 a EUS-guided tissue acquisition was performed using a Franseen needle on DFI guidance against the area where intratumoral vessels were displayed. b Histopathological evaluation of the acquired specimen demonstrating atypical cell clusters with irregularly sized nuclei, resulting in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosis.