Die Komposit-Injektionstechnik zur Erzielung eines ästhetischen Ergebnisses nach kieferorthopädischer Behandlung

Dieser Artikel stellt eine konservierende Methode für die Umgestaltung von Frontzähnen nach kieferorthopädischer Behandlung vor. So können beispielsweise Zapfenzähne, Nichtanlagen und Diastemata trotz kieferorthopädischer Behandlung zu ästhetisch und funktionell nachteiligen Ergebnissen führen. Neben prothetischen Lösungsansätzen rücken durch verbesserte Materialeigenschaften vermehrt auch Kompositaufbauten in den Mittelpunkt der Therapie.

Publication History

Article published online:
21 December 2023

• Literatur

• 1 Haerian A, Rafiei E, Joshan N. et al. Impact of variations in maxillary lateral incisor dimensions on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022; 161: 84-91 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.047. (PMID: 34417035)
• 2 Li R, Mei L, Wang P. et al. Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. Prog Orthod 2019; 20: 16 DOI: 10.1186/s40510-019-0268-y. (PMID: 30957211)
• 3 Gavric A, Mirceta D, Jakobovic M. et al. Craniodentofacial characteristics, dental esthetics-related quality of life, and self-esteem. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147: 711-718 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.027. (PMID: 26038075)
• 4 Klages U, Bruckner A, Zentner A. Dental aesthetics, self-awareness, and oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 507-514 DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.5.507. (PMID: 15536839)
• 5 Hua F, He H, Ngan P. et al. Prevalence of peg-shaped maxillary permanent lateral incisors: A meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 97-109 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.025. (PMID: 23810051)
• 6 Khalaf K, Miskelly J, Voge E. et al. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod 2014; 41: 299-316 DOI: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000116. (PMID: 25404667)
• 7 Zachrisson BU, Rosa M, Toreskog S. Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors: Canine substitution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 434-444 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.02.003. (PMID: 21457853)
• 8 Tuverson DL. Orthodontic treatment using canines in place of missing maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod 1970; 58: 109-127 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(70)90065-5. (PMID: 5269760)
• 9 Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics 1962; 48: 504-529
• 10 Bolton WA. Disharmony In Tooth Size And Its Relation To The Analysis And Treatment Of Malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 113-130
• 11 Othman SA, Harradine NWT. Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton’s ratios: a literature review. J Orthod 2006; 33: 45-51 discussion 29 DOI: 10.1179/146531205225021384. (PMID: 16514133)
• 12 Chaves PRB, Karam AM, Machado AW. Does the presence of maxillary midline diastema influence the perception of dentofacial esthetics in video analysis. Angle Orthod 2021; 91: 54-60 DOI: 10.2319/032020-200.1. (PMID: 33289783)
• 13 Maroulakos G, Maroulakos MP, Tsoukala E. et al. Dental Reshaping Using the Composite Resin Injection Technique After Dental Trauma and Orthodontic Treatment. J Dent Child (Chic) 2021; 88: 144-147 (PMID: 34321148)
• 14 Viswambaran M, Londhe SM, Kumar V. Conservative and esthetic management of diastema closure using porcelain laminate veneers. Med J Armed Forces India 2015; 71: S581-S585 DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.08.014. (PMID: 26843776)
• 15 Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002; 87: 503-509 DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.124094. (PMID: 12070513)
• 16 Layton DM, Clarke M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of non-feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 111-124 DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3202. (PMID: 23476903)
• 17 Layton DM, Clarke M, Walton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 590-603 (PMID: 23101039)
• 18 Frese C, Schiller P, Staehle HJ. et al. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2013; 41: 979-985 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.009. (PMID: 23954577)
• 19 Demirci M, Tuncer S, Öztaş E. et al. A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 2187-2199 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1458-8. (PMID: 25802222)
• 20 Frankenberger R, Heidemann D, Staehle HJ, Hellwig E, Blunck U, Hickel R. DGZ-Gutachten zur Adhäsivtechnik. 2014
• 21 Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres APA. et al. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J 2015; 26: 3-10 DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201302442. (PMID: 25672377)
• 22 Wajdowicz MN, Vandewalle KS, Means MT. Shear bond strength of new self-adhesive flowable composite resins. Gen Dent 2012; 60: e104-e108 (PMID: 22414513)
• 23 Cuevas-Suárez CE, Da Rosa WLdO, Lund RG. et al. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 7-26 DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a41975. (PMID: 30799468)
• 24 Miletic V. Dental Composite Materials for Direct Restorations. Cham: Springer; 2017
• 25 Nair SR, Niranjan NT, Jayasheel A. et al. Comparative Evaluation of Colour Stability and Surface Hardness of Methacrylate Based Flowable and Packable Composite -In vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: ZC51-ZC54 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/21982.9576. (PMID: 28511509)
• 26 Schütz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M. et al. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials. Quintessence Int 2010; 41: e1-e10
• 27 Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable Resin Composites: A Systematic Review and Clinical Considerations. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: ZE18-ZE24 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12294.6129. (PMID: 26266238)
• 28 Ammannato R, Ferraris F, Marchesi G. The “index technique” in worn dentition: a new and conservative approach. Int J Esthet Dent 2015; 10: 68-99 (PMID: 25625128)
• 29 Ammannato R, Rondoni D, Ferraris F. Update on the ‘index techniqueʼ in worn dentition: a no-prep restorative approach with a digital workflow. Int J Esthet Dent 2018; 13: 516-537
• 30 Terry DA, Powers JM. A predictable resin composite injection technique, Part I. Dent Today 2014; 33: 98-101
• 31 Terry DA, Powers JM, Mehta D. et al. A predictable resin composite injection technique, part 2. Dent Today 2014; 33: 12 (PMID: 25174193)
• 32 Geštakovski D. The injectable composite resin technique: biocopy of a natural tooth–advantages of digital planning. Int J Esthet Dent 2021; 16: 280-299 (PMID: 34319664)
• 33 Hosaka K, Tichy A, Motoyama Y. et al. Post-orthodontic recontouring of anterior teeth using composite injection technique with a digital workflow. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32: 638-644 DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12619. (PMID: 32603555)
• 34 Coachman C, Arbeloa de L, Mahn G. et al. An Improved Direct Injection Technique With Flowable Composites. A Digital Workflow Case Report. Oper Dent 2020; 45: 235-242 DOI: 10.2341/18-151-T. (PMID: 32101498)
• 35 Ypei Gia NR, Sampaio CS, Higashi C. et al. The injectable resin composite restorative technique: A case report. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33: 404-414 DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12650. (PMID: 32918395)