Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2192-0277
Diagnosis of a giant gastric subepithelial lesion using a dual-frequency ultrasonic miniprobe
Authors
A 43-year-old woman was referred for endoscopic resection after detection of a giant subepithelial lesion (SEL) during routine physical assessment. The lesion was approximately 50 × 25 mm in size and was located in the posterior wall of the gastric fundus ([Fig. 1]). A comprehensive assessment of the origin and characteristics of the lesion was performed via a dual-frequency ultrasonic miniprobe (InnerMedical Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) ([Fig. 2], [Video 1]).




Initially, the 20 MHz setting of the probe elucidated the lesion origin at the muscularis propria, revealing hypoechoic alterations ([Fig. 3]a). In pursuit of additional data pertaining to the lesion and its adjacent structures, the probe frequency was effortlessly adjusted to 12 MHz by pressing a button. The 12 MHz setting markedly enhanced the lesion’s echogenic profile in the distal region. The lesion was characterized by its inward growth, marked by hypoechoic features interspersed with internal echogenic debris ([Fig. 3]b). The dual-frequency ultrasonic miniprobe findings were indicative of a leiomyoma, which prompted subsequent endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) ([Fig. 4]a–c) for complete resection. Postoperative pathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of leiomyoma ([Fig. 4]d).




For SELs, radial endoscopic ultrasound or miniprobe have become widely adopted across the globe to ascertain the depth of the lesion and to predict its nature [1] [2] [3]. Compared with radial endoscopic ultrasound, miniprobes are more cost-effective and offer greater ease in terms of learning and operation. Additionally, miniprobes utilize higher frequencies, enabling superior visualization of the origin and extent of SELs [3] [4]. Unlike traditional miniprobes, this innovative miniprobe integrates both 12 MHz and 20 MHz into a single device. Users can seamlessly toggle between frequencies via a button, eliminating the need to change endoscopes or probes, and consequently saving valuable diagnostic time. Despite the absence of Doppler functionality in the current dual-frequency miniprobe, which precludes detailed vascular assessment, it is not deemed necessary in this instance as the lesion is solid. To the best of our knowledge this case represents the first use of a dual-frequency ultrasonic miniprobe to diagnose a giant gastric SEL, establishing an invaluable foundation for future clinical applications.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AB
E-Videosis an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy.
All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons
CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission
process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in
Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified
by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website athttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
-
References
- 1 Deprez PH, Moons LMG, Toole DO. et al. Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 412-429
- 2 Kaveh S, Amrita S, Thomas S. AGA clinical practice update on management of subepithelial lesions encountered during routine endoscopy: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20: 2435-2443
- 3 Jacobson BC, Bhatt A, Greer KB. et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118: 46-58
- 4 Seifert H, Fusaroli P, Arcidiacono PG. et al. Controversies in EUS: do we need miniprobes?. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10: 246-269
Correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
20 November 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Deprez PH, Moons LMG, Toole DO. et al. Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 412-429
- 2 Kaveh S, Amrita S, Thomas S. AGA clinical practice update on management of subepithelial lesions encountered during routine endoscopy: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20: 2435-2443
- 3 Jacobson BC, Bhatt A, Greer KB. et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118: 46-58
- 4 Seifert H, Fusaroli P, Arcidiacono PG. et al. Controversies in EUS: do we need miniprobes?. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10: 246-269








