Key words
myopathy - cardiology - physical activity - sleep
Introduction
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a global and common genetic heart disease with
a
prevalence estimated at 1 in 200 in the general population [1]
[2]
[3]. HCM
is clinically characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy without any secondary
causes [1]. There is great variability in disease
severity for HCM with many able to fulfill a normal life expectancy without
increased risk of premature death whereas others experience significant disease
burden after diagnosis [1]
[4]. Similar to the general population guidelines for physical activity
[5], it is recommended by the American Heart
Association/American College of Cardiology 2020 [1] that most individuals with HCM should participate in mild to
moderate-intensity exercise. Mild and moderate-intensity exercise programs in
individuals with HCM are reported to be safe and have resulted in both improved
functional capacity and quality of life [6].
Regular participation in physical activity regardless of age, sex and race has many
cardioprotective effects [7]. However, over
50% of individuals with HCM are not meeting the physical activity guidelines
[5]
[8].
Consequently, overweight and obesity are highly prevalent (70%) in
individuals with HCM [9]. Physical activity presents
an important cornerstone in the management and care of individuals with HCM. This
study firstly evaluated the physical activity, inactivity and sleep patterns of
individuals with HCM compared to age and sex-matched healthy controls, using
wrist-worn triaxial accelerometry, and secondly assessed the associations between
acceleration categories and exercise capacity, clinical biomarkers and quality of
life in individuals with HCM only.
Materials and Methods
Participants
Twenty-one individuals with HCM (52±15 years old, body mass index (BMI):
29.98±6.72 kg/m2) were recruited from a
tertiary center (Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK) and
were part of the SILICOFCM study (NCT03832660) with the inclusion and exclusion
criteria described elsewhere [10]. Age and
sex-matched healthy controls (n=21, 51±14 years old, BMI:
24.97±3.65 kg/m2) were recruited through
advertisements at Newcastle University, UK, and participants self-reported no
history of chronic diseases and were not prescribed any long-term medication.
The healthy controls were representative of a healthy population, and did not
report any cardiovascular conditions; they completed the same length of
monitoring (7 days) and completed the monitoring in a time period similar to the
clinical population [11]. Demographic
characteristics (sex and age) of the individuals with HCM were recorded and then
individually matched to the healthy control individuals’ age and sex
demographic characteristics. The SILICOFCM study protocol was approved by
Research Ethics Committee of the National Health Service, North-East England
– Tyne and Wear South (18/NE/0318) and the healthy
control study was approved by Newcastle University Ethics Committee
(2901/2017). All participants provided written informed consent. All
clinical investigations were conducted according to the principles expressed in
the Declaration of Helsinki.
Study protocol and measurements
Participant age (years) was recorded as a decimal value. Standing height (to the
nearest 0.1 cm) and body weight (to the nearest 0.1 kg) were
measured using the SECA stadiometer and scales (North East Weighing &
Calibration Ltd.). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the equation:
BMI=body mass (kg)÷stature2(m2).
Participants with HCM visited the clinical research facility at the Royal
Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, as part of the SILICOFCM study [10]. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to
measure cardiac function and dimensions, which included: left ventricular
outflow tract maximum pressure (mmHg), interventricular septum diameter (mm),
posterior wall diameter (mm), left atrial diameter (mm), left atrial volume
index (ml/m2) and E/E’ ratio. Peak oxygen
consumption (ml/kg/min) was calculated to determine exercise
capacity and was measured on a cycle ergometer. NTproBNP (ng/L) was
recorded via venous sample. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF)
questionnaire was recorded to determine disease severity.
All participants completed 7-day monitoring using wrist-worn triaxial
accelerometers (GENEActiv, ActivInsights Ltd, UK). Accelerometer data was
processed in R using R-package GGIR (Version 2.7.0) [12]
[13]
[14]. Signals were inspected and corrected for calibration error [15] and only days with at least 16 hours of
valid data were retained for further analysis. Participants were required to
have worn the accelerometer for a minimum wear time of at least three days
(including one weekend day) [16]. The average
magnitude of wrist acceleration per 5-second epoch was calculated with metric
ENMO as previously described (1 mg=0.001 x gravitational
acceleration) [12]. Monitor non-wear was detected
as described previously [12] and replaced by the
average accelerometer data on similar time points on different days of the
measurement [17]
[18]. The following acceleration categories were calculated: Inactivity
(<40 mg), light physical activity (40–100 mg)
and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (>100 mg) [19]
[20]. Time spent
in 5 to 10-minute (MVPA-5 min) and 10-minute (MVPA-10 min) bouts of MVPA, as
well as time spent in 30-minute inactivity (inactivity-30min) bouts, was
calculated. Estimated total sleep duration (minutes) and sleep efficiency
(%) were calculated after sleep onset with the analysis described
elsewhere [21].
Data analysis
Data were analyzed using R (version 4.1) [14] and
SPSS (version 27, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The level of significance was
set at p<0.05. Data are described as median (interquartile range)
unless otherwise stated. Prior to statistical analysis, data were screened for
normality and outliers by Shapiro-Wilks and boxplots. Although the groups were
age and sex-matched, we were unable to match by BMI, which is important given
that sustained bouts of physical activity are associated with lower levels of
obesity as measured by BMI [22]. Significant
differences in BMI were found between individuals with HCM and healthy controls
(p<0.01). To ensure our findings accounted for these
differences, we adjusted our analysis for BMI with differences in acceleration
categories between groups being assessed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). For
individuals with HCM only, relationships between acceleration categories and
clinical measures (left atrial diameter and volume, peak oxygen consumption,
NTproBNP and MLHF) were assessed using either Spearman’s rank or
Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r).
Results
Participant demographics, clinical characteristics and medications list are presented
in [Table 1]. BMI was significantly different between
individuals with HCM and healthy controls (p<0.01). Differences in
acceleration categories between individuals with HCM and healthy controls is
described in [Table 2]. After adjusting for BMI,
individuals with HCM engaged in less MVPA (86 (55–138) vs. 140
(121–149) minutes/day, p<0.05) compared to healthy
controls. Time spent in MVPA-5 min bouts (6 (2–15) vs. 27 (23–37)
minutes/day, p<0.01) and MVPA-10 min bouts (9 (0–19)
vs. 35 (17–54) minutes/day, p<0.01) were also lower
in individuals with HCM versus healthy controls. There were no significant
differences in inactivity, sleep duration or sleep efficiency between individuals
with HCM versus healthy controls. Inactivity time and bouts (inactivity-30min) were
higher in individuals with HCM compared to healthy controls, whereby those with HCM
spent over 6 hours/day in 30-minute inactivity bouts. As detailed in
[Table 3], for individuals with HCM only, peak
oxygen consumption was positively correlated with MVPA (r=0.60,
p<0.01) and MVPA-5 min bouts (r=0.47,
p<0.05). The MLHF score was positively correlated with sleep duration
(r=0.45, p<0.05). No other significant
correlations were found.
Table 1 Participant demographics, clinical characteristics and
medications for individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and healthy
controls
|
HCM (n=21)
|
Healthy controls (n=21)
|
Demographics
|
Age (years) (mean±SD)
|
52±15
|
51±14
|
Sex (male/female)
|
15/6
|
15/6
|
Body weight (kg)
|
86 (80–92)*
|
80 (68–86)
|
BMI (kg/m2)
|
29 (25–31)**
|
25 (22–27)
|
Clinical characteristics
|
ICD, N (%)
|
7 (33)
|
|
IVSD (mm)
|
16 (13–18)
|
|
PWD (mm)
|
10 (9–10)
|
|
LVOTmaxPG (mmHg)
|
4.5 (3.1–6.8)
|
|
LAD (mm)
|
38 (36–41)
|
|
LAVi (ml/m2)
|
30 (27–42)
|
|
E/E’
|
8.7 (5.9–9.8)
|
|
NTproBNP (ng/L)
|
325 (103–826)
|
|
Exercise capacity and quality of life
|
Peak oxygen consumption (ml/kg/min)
|
19 (16–21)
|
|
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (total score)
|
16 (6–30)
|
|
Medications, N (%)
|
Beta-adrenergic blocker
|
11 (52)
|
|
Calcium channel blocker
|
5 (24)
|
|
Diuretics
|
2 (10)
|
|
Anti-arrhythmia
|
4 (19)
|
|
Anti-anginal
|
1 (5)
|
|
Diabetes
|
1 (5)
|
|
Anti-inflammatory
|
3 (14)
|
|
Anti-depressant
|
3 (14)
|
|
Statins
|
4 (19)
|
|
Anti-coagulants
|
6 (29)
|
|
Data described as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise stated.
Significant difference *p<0.05, **
p<0.01. Abbreviations: BMI: Body mass index; HCM:
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ICD: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator;
IVSD: Interventricular septum diameter; LAD: Left atrial diameter; LAVi:
Left atrial volume index; LVOTmaxPG: Left ventricular outflow tract maximum
pressure; PWD: Posterior wall diameter.
Table 2 Acceleration categories (physical activity, inactivity
and sleep variables) separated by individuals with hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy vs. age and sex-matched healthy controls
|
HCM (n=21)
|
Healthy controls (n=21)
|
p-value (adjusted for BMI)
|
Acceleration categories
|
Wear time (minutes/day)
|
1440 (1440–1440)
|
1440 (1440–1440)
|
|
Waking hours (minutes/day)
|
Inactivity
|
657 (643–749)
|
593 (547–708)
|
0.724
|
Light physical activity
|
197 (174–222)
|
225 (179–286)
|
0.286
|
MVPA
|
86 (55–138)
|
140 (121–149)
|
0.048*
|
Bouts of activity during waking time
(minutes/day)
|
Inactivity 30-minute
|
376 (308–484)
|
242 (193–348)
|
0.241
|
MVPA 5-minute
|
6 (2–15)
|
27 (23–37)
|
0.009**
|
MVPA 10-minute
|
9 (0–19)
|
35 (17–54)
|
0.000**
|
Sleep
|
Sleep duration (minutes/day)
|
411 (366–437)
|
400 (363–435)
|
0.175
|
Sleep efficiency (%)
|
88 (80–92)
|
88 (86–90)
|
0.272
|
Data described as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise stated.
Significant difference *p<0.05, **
p<0.01. Abbreviations: HCM: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;
MVPA: Moderate-vigorous physical activity.
Table 3 Correlations between acceleration categories and
clinical parameters for individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
only
|
|
Inactivity
|
LPA
|
MVPA
|
MVPA-5 min
|
MVPA-10 min
|
Inactivity-30 min
|
Sleep duration
|
Sleep efficiency
|
Left atrial diameter (mm)
|
r
|
0.19
|
−0.32
|
−0.21
|
−0.30
|
−0.08
|
0.36
|
−0.12
|
−0.38
|
p
|
0.42
|
0.16
|
0.37
|
0.19
|
0.74
|
0.11
|
0.61
|
0.09
|
N
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
Left atrial volume index (ml/m2)
|
r
|
−0.20
|
−0.13
|
0.15
|
−0.07
|
0.38
|
−0.13
|
−0.05
|
−0.22
|
p
|
0.38
|
0.59
|
0.51
|
0.77
|
0.09
|
0.58
|
0.83
|
0.35
|
N
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
Peak oxygen consumption (ml/kg/min)
|
r
|
−0.19
|
0.08
|
0.60**
|
0.47*
|
0.03
|
−0.30
|
−0.18
|
−0.09
|
p
|
0.43
|
0.74
|
0.01
|
0.04
|
0.90
|
0.21
|
0.47
|
0.72
|
N
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
NTproBNP (ng/L)
|
r
|
−0.18
|
−0.02
|
−0.01
|
−0.03
|
0.16
|
−0.24
|
0.19
|
−0.17
|
p
|
0.47
|
0.94
|
0.97
|
0.89
|
0.51
|
0.32
|
0.43
|
0.48
|
N
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
19
|
MLHF (total score)
|
r
|
−0.26
|
0.21
|
−0.13
|
0.02
|
−0.14
|
−0.27
|
0.45*
|
0.12
|
p
|
0.25
|
0.36
|
0.57
|
0.92
|
0.55
|
0.23
|
0.04
|
0.61
|
N
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
Significant difference *p<0.05,
**p<0.01. Abbreviations: LPA: Light
physical activity; MLHF: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure; MVPA:
Moderate-vigorous physical activity. Inactivity, LPA, MVPA, MVPA-5 min,
MVPA-10 min, Inactivity-30 min; sleep duration measured in
minutes/day; sleep efficiency measured as %.
Discussion
The major findings of this study were individuals with HCM do not accumulate bouts
of
MVPA (MVPA-5 min and MVPA-10 min) and are spending less time in this intensity when
compared to age and sex-matched healthy controls. For individuals with HCM only,
significant positive associations existed between peak oxygen consumption and MVPA
and MVPA-5 min bouts. These findings highlight that physical fitness is strongly
related to time spent in moderate-intensity activity. Interestingly, the
relationships found between the MLHF score and sleep duration suggests that a more
severe disease burden is associated with longer sleep duration. These findings
provide new insights into short-term MVPA patterns of individuals with HCM.
Individuals with HCM continue to follow a sedentary lifestyle due to the fear of
sudden cardiac death [6]
[23]. Thirty-three percent of individuals with HCM had an implantable
cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in this study. Anxiety towards suffering an ICD
shock is associated with not meeting the physical activity guidelines in individuals
with HCM [24]. No differences in
accelerometry-measured physical activity has been found between HCM individuals with
or without ICD [24]. Physical activity interventions
have been deemed safe and beneficial for this population [6]. For example, the randomized controlled RESET-HCM trial, which
included high-risk individuals with HCM (i. e.>30% fitted
with ICD) reported no major adverse events including appropriate ICD shocks in
either the exercise training or usual activity groups [25]. The amount of time spent in bouts of MVPA (MVPA-5 min and MVPA-10
min) was significantly lower in individuals with HCM versus healthy controls in this
current study when controlled for BMI. Similarly, individuals who have both Type 2
diabetes and cardiovascular disease have consistently lower MVPA-10 min bouts
compared to healthy controls [19]. Interestingly, in
individuals with cardiovascular disease, a protective association has been found
between accumulating at least 10-minute bouts of MVPA and lower frailty, which was
not noted in individuals without cardiovascular diseases [26]. Our current findings are noteworthy as this population were
relatively well with a median peak oxygen consumption of
19 ml/kg/min, NTproBNP of 325 ng/L and LAVi
of 30 ml/m2 suggesting that in a mildly diseased
population of HCM patients, activity bouts remain poor.
The prevalence of overweight and obesity is high in individuals with HCM, which is
associated with disease progression, atrial fibrillation and heart failure onset
[9]. In this current study, individuals with HCM
had a significantly higher BMI than healthy controls, which suggested overweight or
pre-obesity. Sustained bouts of at least moderate-intensity physical activity
lasting 10 minutes or more are associated with lower levels of obesity
markers such as BMI and waist circumference [22].
Regular engagement in MVPA in middle-aged individuals with HCM has been found to be
an important indicator of lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [27]. In this current study, engagement in MVPA was
higher than expected for individuals with HCM when compared to other studies [28]
[29], but this may
have resulted from the sporadic arm movements captured on the accelerometer, which
is difficult to discount from true physical activity [19]. Therefore, it is more informative to look at MVPA in bouts when
looking at associations with clinical parameters [19].
Peak oxygen consumption was positively associated with both MVPA and MVPA-5 min
bouts. These positive associations are similar to the findings from the MAVERICK-HCM
Study, who noted positive correlations for peak oxygen uptake with both average
daily accelerometer units and step counts in individuals with symptomatic
non-obstructive HCM [30]. Likewise, positive
associations have been previously found between self-reported exercise capacity and
moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity [31]. Moderate-intensity exercise training has resulted in positive increases
in peak oxygen consumption in individuals with HCM [25]. However, this is the first study to report these associations with
accelerometry measured MVPA bouts in this clinical population.
In this current study, associations were found between the MLHF score and sleep
duration. Sleep disorders are highly prevalent in individuals with HCM [1]. Pedrosa (2010) [32]
found individuals with HCM had longer sleep duration but self-reported worse sleep
quality, longer sleep latency, more sleep disturbances and daytime dysfunctions
leading to a negative impact health-related quality of life. Possible reasons for
longer sleep duration in individuals with HCM has been linked to higher consumption
of antidepressants or more diseased patients spending more time in bed [32]. However, there were no significant differences in
sleep duration between individuals with HCM and healthy controls but those
individuals with HCM who reported a higher disease burden spent more time
asleep.
In conclusion, individuals with HCM are consistently not accumulating MVPA in either
5 or 10-minute bouts. The positive associations found between peak oxygen
consumption and the MVPA variables highlight the importance of physical activity
intensity to physical fitness. Higher disease burden was prominent in those with
longer sleep duration in this study, which warrants further investigation.
Individuals with HCM should be encouraged to engage in at least moderate-intensity
physical activity in minimum bouts of 5 and 10 minutes to benefit physical
fitness and limit the periods of inactivity to potentially improve exercise
tolerance and reduce disease burden.