Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2158-7895
Endoscopic mucosal resection with a dedicated bipolar soft snare for large flat colonic polyps
Authors
When removing large flat colonic polyps (LFCPs) en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may be suitable; however, it requires significant expertise and a long procedural time. The use of a conventional monopolar snare for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large lesions increases the risk of deep mural injury [1]. Bipolar snares are safer than monopolar snares because the current passes only through the tissue between the two electrodes, so causing minimal damage to the muscle layer [2].
The Dragonare dedicated bipolar soft snare (Zeon Medical Inc., Japan) has a unique mechanism where one electrode is at the tip of the snare and the other at the sheath, which allows uniform cauterization of the tissue. The soft nature of the snare allows stabilization of its tip at the distal margin of the lesion while opening the snare, thereby enabling en bloc resection of LFCPs. This requires a slower cutting technique compared with monopolar devices. Herein, we report two cases in which EMR was performed using the bipolar soft snare (26 mm) for LFCPs ([Video 1]).
Video 1 Two cases in which endoscopic mucosal resection is performed using a dedicated bipolar soft snare (26 mm) for large flat colonic polyps.
The first patient was a 78-year-old man who had a 25-mm nongranular laterally spreading tumor (LST) found in his descending colon ([Fig. 1]). Although submucosal invasion was suspected, the patient wanted to undergo endoscopic treatment. Underwater bipolar EMR (BEMR) was performed and the lesion was completely removed, without the occurrence of any adverse events ([Fig. 2]). Pathological examination confirmed the lesion was a submucosal invasive adenocarcinoma ([Fig. 3]); however, the patient chose not to undergo an additional surgical resection.






The second patient was an 86-year-old man who had a 30-mm granular-type LST found in his ascending colon ([Fig. 4 a]). Injection-based BEMR was performed, and the lesion was completely removed, without the occurrence of any adverse events ([Fig. 4 b]). Pathological examination revealed a focally high grade tubulovillous adenoma.


BEMR with dedicated snares could be a new alternative when treating LFCPs. ESD can be replaced with BEMR for eligible polyps.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD
E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy.
All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons
CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission
process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in
Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified
by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (https://www.editage.com) for English language editing.
-
References
- 1 van Hatton WA, Shahidi N, Vosko S. et al. Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods. Gut 2021; 70: 1691-1697
- 2 Shinmura K, Ikematsu H, Kojima M. et al. Safety of endoscopic procedures with monopolar versus bipolar instruments in an ex vivo porcine model. BMC Gastroenterology 2020; 20: 1-6
Corresponding author
Publication History
Article published online:
15 September 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 van Hatton WA, Shahidi N, Vosko S. et al. Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods. Gut 2021; 70: 1691-1697
- 2 Shinmura K, Ikematsu H, Kojima M. et al. Safety of endoscopic procedures with monopolar versus bipolar instruments in an ex vivo porcine model. BMC Gastroenterology 2020; 20: 1-6








