Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie, Table of Contents Laryngorhinootologie 2024; 103(02): 128-132DOI: 10.1055/a-2109-3463 Der interessante Fall Pricktest als Provokation - schwere anaphylaktische Reaktion auf Hauttests mit Ceftriaxon bei beruflicher ExpositionSkin Prick Test as a Provocation Test – Severe Anaphylactic Reaction to Skin Tests with Ceftriaxone in Two Occupationally Exposed Workers Andreas J. Bircher 1 Allergologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Schweiz , Betül Parlar , Carlos Morales Mateluna , Ingmar Heijnen , Kathrin Scherer Hofmeier› Author AffiliationsRecommend Article Abstract Buy ArticleSchlüsselwörter SchlüsselwörterPricktest - Ceftriaxon - Komplikation - Anaphylaxie - berufliche Exposition Keywords KeywordsSkin prick test - ceftriaxone - complication - anaphylaxis - occupational exposure Full Text References Literatur 1 Wurpts G, Aberer W, Dickel H. et al. Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics: Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the German Society of Allergology (AeDA), German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (OGAI), and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy (PEG). Allergol Select 2020; 4: 11-43 2 Co Minh HB, Bousquet PJ, Fontaine C. et al. Systemic reactions during skin tests with beta-lactams: a risk factor analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 466-468 3 Liccardi G, DʼAmato G, Canonica GW. et al. Systemic reactions from skin testing: literature review. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006; 16: 75-78 4 Filipe P, Almeida RS, Rodrigo FG. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from cephalosporins. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 226 5 Foti C, Bonamonte D, Trenti R. et al. Occupational contact allergy to cephalosporins. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36: 104-105 6 Häusermann P, Bircher AJ. Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity to ceftriaxone, and anaphylaxis due to intradermal testing with other beta-lactam antibiotics, in a previously amoxicillin-sensitized patient. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47: 311-312 7 Antunes J, Silva R, Pacheco D. et al. Occupational contact allergy to cephalosporins. Dermatol Online J 2011; 17: 13 8 Classen A, Fuchs T. Occupational allergy to β-lactam antibiotics. Allergo J Int 2015; 24: 54-57 9 Kim JE, Kim SH, Jin HJ. et al. IgE Sensitization to Cephalosporins in Health Care Workers. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2012; 4: 85-91 10 Tadokoro K, Niimi N, Ohtoshi T. et al. Cefotiam-induced IgE-mediated occupational contact anaphylaxis of nurses; case reports, RAST analysis, and a review of the literature. Clin Exp Allergy 1994; 24: 127-133 11 Gaspar-Marques J, Finelli E, Martins PC. et al. Piperacillin-tazobactam anaphylaxis: a rare cause of occupational disease. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 50: 89-91 12 Bircher AJ. et al. Drug AllergensKanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. In: John SM, Duus Johansen J, Rustemeyer T. . 3rd. Aufl. Berlin, New York: Springer; 2020: 559-578 13 Aurich S, Schuurmann M, Simon JC. et al. Anaphylactic shock caused by intradermal testing with cefuroxime. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2017; 15: 668-670 14 Diaz Angulo S, Szram J, Welch J. et al. Occupational asthma in antibiotic manufacturing workers: case reports and systematic review. J Allergy (Cairo) 2011; 2011: 365683 15 Kruszewski J, Bant A. Occupational penicillin allergy as an example of chronic recurring anaphylaxis. Wiad Lek 2001; 54: 116-121 16 Merget R, Sander I, Fartasch M. et al. Occupational generalized urticaria and anaphylaxis after inhalation of cefuroxime in a nurse. Am J Ind Med 2018; 61: 261-266 17 Siracusa A, Folletti I, Gerth van Wijk R. et al. Occupational anaphylaxis – an EAACI task force consensus statement. Allergy 2015; 70: 141-152 18 Goossens A, Geebelen J, Vander Hulst K. et al. Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic Industries. In: John SM, Duus Johansen J, Rustemeyer T, Elsner P, Maibach HI. . Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. 3rd. Aufl. Berlin, New York: Springer; 2020: 2203-2219 19 Reddy R, Maibach HI, Belsito DV. Healthcare Workers. John SM, Duus Johansen J, Rustemeyer T, Elsner P, Maibach HI. Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. 3rd. Aufl. Berlin, New York: Springer; 2020. 20 Alonso Díaz de Durana MD, Fernández-Rivas M, Casas ML. et al. Anaphylaxis during negative penicillin skin prick testing confirmed by elevated serum tryptase. Allergy 2003; 58: 159 21 Aurich S, Schuurmann M, Simon JC. et al. Anaphylactic shock caused by intradermal testing with cefuroxime. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2017; 15: 668-670 22 Dreborg S. The risk of general reactions to skin prick testing (SPT). Allergy 1996; 51: 60-61 23 Koshak EA. Could a routine skin test to penicillin lead to fatal anaphylaxis?. East Mediterr Health J 2000; 6: 526-531 24 Novembre E, Bernardini R, Bertini G. et al. Skin-prick-test-induced anaphylaxis. Allergy 1995; 50: 511-513 25 Pitsios C, Dimitriou A, Kontou-Fili K. Allergic reactions during allergy skin testing with food allergens. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 41: 126-128 26 Riezzo I, Bello S, Neri M. et al. Ceftriaxone Intradermal Test-Related Fatal Anaphylactic Shock: A Medico-Legal Nightmare. Allergy 2010; 65: 130-131 27 Rudzki E, Rebandel P. Occupational contact urticaria from penicillin. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 131: 192
