Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endoscopy 2023; 55(S 01): E643-E644
DOI: 10.1055/a-2057-0460
E-Videos

Tips and tricks for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy

Authors

  • Sardar M. Shah-Khan

    Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Khaled Elfert

    Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Avik Sarkar

    Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Haroon Shahid

    Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Amy Tyberg

    Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Michel Kahaleh

    Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
 

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is a treatment option for patients with biliary obstruction in whom traditional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not possible due to altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy. In such cases, EUS-BD is a good alternative to surgery or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), with comparable clinical and technical success rates [1]. Two approaches have been described for EUS-guided transluminal biliary drainage. EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy uses the transgastric approach and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy uses the transduodenal approach [2].

Here, we present the case of a 78-year-old woman with a history of gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma, for which she underwent Whipple surgery 8 months earlier, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. She was admitted to the hospital after the 11th cycle of chemotherapy due to severe weakness and jaundice. Her blood tests were remarkable for high liver function tests of cholestatic pattern. Computed tomography of the abdomen showed an ill-defined lesion at the porta hepatis with intrahepatic biliary dilation. It was decided that EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy should be performed.

A 19-gauge needle was used to access the dilated left intrahepatic duct. Then, cholangiography revealed biliary obstruction extending to the bifurcation, with upstream biliary dilation. A guidewire was passed into the left intrahepatic duct and a hepaticogastrostomy tract was created using needle-knife electrocautery (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA). Next, the tract was serially dilated, and a 10 mm × 10 cm fully covered metallic stent (Viabil; Conmed, Utica, New York, USA) was placed and subsequently dilated. An Autotome sphincterotome (Boston Scientific) was used to cross the obstruction; then, a 12 cm double-pigtail stent (DPS) (Wilson Cook, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA) was placed through the stent bypassing the biliary obstruction and reaching the small bowel. Another DPS was placed across the left intrahepatic duct. A forward-viewing endoscope confirmed the placement of the DPS deep into the jejunum ([Fig. 1, ] [Video 1]). The patient’s clinical status improved with a trend toward lower liver function tests. After 6 months, the patient was clinically stable after a cycle of chemoradiation.

Zoom
Fig. 1 The two steps described for an ideal hepaticogastrostomy.

Video 1 Step-by-step hepaticogastrostomy.

EUS-BD via hepaticogastrostomy is a safe and effective procedure when performed by an endoscopist well trained in both EUS and ERCP.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AL_2AD

E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).

This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos


Competing interests

M. Kahaleh has received grants from BSC, Cook, Apollo, Gore, and Fuji, and is a consultant for BSC, Medtronic, Microtech, Creo, Apollo, and AbbVie. A. Tyberg is a consultant for BSC, Endogastric Solution, and Ambu. S. M. Shah-Khan, K. Elfert, A. Sarkar, and H. Shahid declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Dr Kahaleh has received grants from BSC, COOK, APOLLO, GORE and Fuji. He is a consultant for BSC, Medtronic, Microtech, Creo, Apollo and Abvvie. Dr Tyberg is a consultant for BSC, Endogastric solution and Ambu.


Corresponding author

Michel Kahaleh, MD
Gastroenterology
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
51 French Street
MEB 479 New Brunswick
NJ 08901
United States   

Publication History

Article published online:
21 April 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany


Zoom
Fig. 1 The two steps described for an ideal hepaticogastrostomy.