Notaufnahme up2date 2023; 05(01): 13-18
DOI: 10.1055/a-1991-6459
SOP/Arbeitsablauf

Diagnostischer Algorithmus Lungenarterienembolie

Katharina Dany
1   Interdisziplinäre Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
,
Philipp Kümpers
1   Interdisziplinäre Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations

Die Lungenarterienembolie ist eine differenzialdiagnostische Herausforderung in der Notaufnahme. Der hier vorgestellte diagnostische Algorithmus hilft, Überdiagnostik zu vermeiden.



Publication History

Article published online:
10 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Ende-Verhaar YM, Cannegieter SC, Vonk Noordegraaf A. et al. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: a contemporary view of the published literature. Eur Respir J 2017; 49: 1601792 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01792-2016.
  • 2 Kahn SR, Hirsch AM, Akaberi A. et al. Functional and Exercise Limitations After a First Episode of Pulmonary Embolism: Results of the ELOPE Prospective Cohort Study. Chest 2017; 151: 1058-1068 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.030. (PMID: 27932051)
  • 3 Pollack CV, Schreiber D, Goldhaber SZ. et al. Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 700-706 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.071.
  • 4 Freund Y, Chauvin A, Jimenez S. et al. Effect of a Diagnostic Strategy Using an Elevated and Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Threshold on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021; 326: 2141-2149 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.20750.
  • 5 Freund Y, Cohen-Aubart F, Bloom B. Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Review. JAMA 2022; 328: 1336-1345 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.16815. (PMID: 36194215)
  • 6 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C. et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 543-603 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405.
  • 7 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 98-107 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00010.
  • 8 Freund Y, Cachanado M, Aubry A. et al. Effect of the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria on Subsequent Thromboembolic Events Among Low-Risk Emergency Department Patients: The PROPER Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018; 319: 559-566 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.21904.
  • 9 Righini M, Van Es J, Den Exter PL. et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study [published correction appears in JAMA. 2014 Apr 23–30;311(16):1694]. JAMA 2014; 311: 1117-1124 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.2135.
  • 10 Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C. et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247-1255 DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00790.x.
  • 11 [Anonym]. Evidence review for the use of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: Venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2020
  • 12 van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM. et al. Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for Diagnosis of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 1139-1149 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813865. (PMID: 30893534)
  • 13 Penaloza A, Verschuren F, Meyer G. et al. Comparison of the unstructured clinician gestalt, the wells score, and the revised Geneva score to estimate pretest probability for suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med 2013; 62: 117-124.e2 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.11.002.
  • 14 Geersing GJ, Takada T, Klok FA. et al. Ruling out pulmonary embolism across different healthcare settings: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2022; 19: e1003905 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.100390.
  • 15 van der Hulle T, Cheung WY, Kooij S. et al. Simplified diagnostic management of suspected pulmonary embolism (the YEARS study): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study [published correction appears in Lancet. 2017 Jul 15;390(10091):230]. Lancet 2017; 390: 289-297 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30885-1.
  • 16 Schouten HJ, Geersing GJ, Koek HL. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013; 346: f2492 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2492. (PMID: 23645857)