Sportphysio 2022; 10(05): 219-225
DOI: 10.1055/a-1955-5578
Focus
Einführung

Knorpelschaden am Kniegelenk: operative Behandlungsmöglichkeiten und Rückkehr zum Sport

Philipp Niemeyer
,
Alexander Bumberger

Die Diagnose „Knorpelschaden am Knie“ weckt schlimme Befürchtungen. Doch dank moderner Operationsverfahren ist für viele Sportler eine Rückkehr zum Sport möglich.



Publication History

Article published online:
23 November 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literaturverzeichnis

  • 1 Behrens P, Bosch U, Bruns J. et al. Indikations- und Durchführungsempfehlungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft „Geweberegeneration und Gewebeersatz“ zur Autologen Chondrozyten-Transplantation (ACT). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142 (05) 529-539
  • 2 Beletsky A, Naveen NB, Tauro T. et al. Microdrilling demonstrates superior patient-reported outcomes and lower revision rates than traditional microfracture: A matched cohort analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3 (03) e629-e638
  • 3 Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A. et al. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 (14) 889-895
  • 4 Brittberg M, Recker D, Ilgenfritz J. et al. Matrix-applied characterized autologous cultured chondrocytes versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (06) 1343-1351
  • 5 Chen H, Sun J, Hoemann CD. et al. Drilling and microfracture lead to different bone structure and necrosis during bone-marrow stimulation for cartilage repair. J Orthop Res 2009; 27 (11) 1432-1438
  • 6 Faber S, Angele P, Zellner J. et al. Comparison of clinical outcome following cartilage repair for patients with underlying varus deformity with or without additional high tibial osteotomy: A propensity score-matched study based on the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Cartilage 2021; 13 (1_suppl): 1206S-1216S
  • 7 Hirschmüller A, Baur H, Braun S. Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation for isolated cartilage defects of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (12) 2686-96
  • 8 Hirschmüller A, Schoch W. Baur. et al. Rehabilitation before regenerative cartilage knee surgery: A new prehabilitation guideline based on the best available evidence. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 2019; 139 (02) 217-230
  • 9 Marlovits S, Zeller P, Singer P. et al. Cartilage repair: Generations of autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57 (01) 24-31
  • 10 McCormick F, Yanke A, Provencher M. et al. Minced articular cartilage – basic science, surgical technique, and clinical application. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2008; 16 (04) 217-220
  • 11 Mithoefer K, Hambly K, Della Villa S. et al. Return to sports participation after articular cartilage repair in the knee: Scientific evidence. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (1_suppl), 167S-176S
  • 12 Mithoefer K, Mcadams T, Williams RJ. et al. Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: An evidence-based systematic analysis. Am Journal Sports Med 2009; 37 (10) 2053-2063
  • 13 Niemeyer P, Albrecht D, Aurich M. et al. Empfehlungen der AG Klinische Geweberegeneration zur Behandlung von Knorpelschäden am Kniegelenk. Z Orthop Unfall 21.02.2022; DOI: 10.1055/A-1663–6807.
  • 14 Niemeyer P, Becher C, Brucker PU. et al. Stellenwert der matrixaugmentierten Knochenmarkstimulation in der Behandlung von Knorpelschäden des Kniegelenks: Konsensusempfehlungen der AG Klinische Geweberegeneration der DGOU. Z Orthop Unfall 2018; 156 (05) 513-532
  • 15 Niemeyer P, Faber S, Bumberger A. Handlungsempfehlung: Knorpeltherapie am Kniegelenk. Knie Journal 2022; 4: 72-75
  • 16 Niemeyer P, Feucht MJ, Fritz J. et al. Cartilage repair surgery for full-thickness defects of the knee in Germany: Indications and epidemiological data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136 (07) 891-7
  • 17 Niemeyer P, Laute V, Zinser W. et al. A prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III noninferiority trial to compare the clinical efficacy of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroid technology versus arthroscopic microfracture for cartilage defects. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (07) 232596711985444
  • 18 Niemeyer P, Laute V, Zinser W. et al. Safety and efficacy of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroid technology is independent of spheroid dose after 4 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (04) 1130-1143
  • 19 Peterson L, Vasiliadis HS, Brittberg M. et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: A long-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (06) 1117-1124
  • 20 Rogan S, Taeymans J, Hirschmüller A. et al. Effect of continuous passive motion for cartilage regenerative surgery – a systematic literature review. Z Orthop Unfall 2013; 151 (05) 468-474
  • 21 Saris DBF, Vanlauwe J, Victor J. et al. Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (Suppl. 01) 10S-19S
  • 22 Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK. et al. The microfracture technic in the management of complete cartilage defects in the knee joint. Orthopade 1999; 28 (01) 26-32
  • 23 Steinwachs MR, Gille J, Volz M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence on the use of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in the knee. Cartilage 2021; 13 (1_suppl): 42S-56S