Minimal water exchange by the air–water valve versus left colon water exchange in unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Background Water exchange colonoscopy is the least painful method for unsedated colonoscopies. Simplified left colon water exchange (LWE) reduces the cecal intubation time but it is difficult to avoid the use of an additional pump. Minimal water exchange (MWE) is an improved novel method that eliminates the need for pumps, but it is not clear whether MWE has the same efficiency as LWE.

Methods This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial conducted in a tertiary hospital. Enrolled patients were randomized 1:1 to the LWE group or MWE group. The primary outcome was recalled insertion pain measured by a 4-point verbal rating scale. Secondary outcomes included adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation time, volume of water used, and patient willingness to repeat unsedated colonoscopy.

Results 226 patients were included (LWE n = 113, MWE n = 113). The MWE method showed noninferior moderate/severe pain rates compared with the LWE method (10.6 % vs. 9.7 %), with a difference of 0.9 percentage points (99 % confidence interval [CI] –9.5 to 11.3; threshold, 15 %). ADR, cecal intubation time, and willingness to repeat unsedated colonoscopy were not significantly different between the two groups, but the mean volume of water used was significantly less with MWE than with LWE (163.7 mL vs. 407.2 mL; 99 %CI –298.28 to –188.69).

Conclusion Compared with LWE, MWE demonstrated a noninferior outcome for insertion pain, and comparable cecal intubation time and ADR, but reduced the volume of water used and eliminated the need for a water pump.

Publication History

Received: 27 January 2022

Accepted after revision: 23 August 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 August 2022

Article published online:
14 October 2022

• References

• 1 Durdey P, Weston P, Williams NJL. Colonoscopy or barium enema as initial investigation of colonic disease. Lancet 1987; 2: 549-551
• 2 Aljebreen A, Almadi M, Leung FW. Sedated vs unsedated colonoscopy: a prospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 5113-5118
• 3 Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A. et al. Unsedated colonoscopy: an option for some but not for all. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 392-398
• 4 Leung FW, Harker JO, Jackson G. et al. A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 693-700
• 5 Cadoni S, Falt P, Gallittu P. et al. Water exchange is the least painful colonoscope insertion technique and increases completion of unsedated colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1972-1980
• 6 Hsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1390-1400
• 7 Garborg K, Kaminski MF, Lindenburger W. et al. Water exchange versus carbon dioxide insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 192-199
• 8 Cheng CL, Kuo YL, Hsieh YH. et al. Water exchange colonoscopy decreased adenoma miss rates compared with literature data and local data with CO2 insufflation: an observational study. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19: 143
• 9 Jia H, Pan Y, Guo X. et al. Water exchange method significantly improves adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 568-576
• 10 Fuccio L, Frazzoni L, Hassan C. et al. Water exchange colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 589-597
• 11 Cadoni S, Ishaq S, Hassan C. et al. Water-assisted colonoscopy: an international modified Delphi review on definitions and practice recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 1411-1420
• 12 Wasan SK, Schroy PC. Water-assisted unsedated colonoscopy: does the end justify the means?. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 551-553
• 13 Wang X, Luo H, Xiang Y. et al. Left-colon water exchange preserves the benefits of whole colon water exchange at reduced cecal intubation time conferring significant advantage in diagnostic colonoscopy – a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 916-923
• 14 Yeh JH, Chien HY. Minimal water exchange colonoscopy. VideoGIE 2019; 4: 56-57
• 15 Cadoni S, Ishaq S. How to perform water exchange colonoscopy, with tips and tricks. VideoGIE 2019; 4: 355-357
• 16 Kaminski M, Robertson D, Senore C. et al. Optimizing the quality of colorectal cancer screening worldwide. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 404-417
• 17 Moon SY, Kim BC, Sohn DK. et al. Predictors for difficult cecal insertion in colonoscopy: the impact of obesity indices. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 2346-2354
• 18 Despott EJ, Murino A, Nakamura M. et al. A prospective randomised study comparing double-balloon colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy in pre-defined technically difficult cases. Dig Liver Dis 2017; 49: 507-513
• 19 Luo H, Zhang L, Liu X. et al. Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 767-773
• 20 Cadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P. et al. A randomized, controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 557-566
• 21 Cadoni S, Hassan C, Frazzoni L. et al. Impact of water exchange colonoscopy on endoscopy room efficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 159-167
• 22 Asai S, Fujimoto N, Tanoue K. et al. Water immersion colonoscopy facilitates straight passage of the colonoscope through the sigmoid colon without loop formation: randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 345-353
• 23 Waye J, Thomas-Gibson S. How I do colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 259-262
• 24 Leung JW, Thai A, Yen A. et al. Magnetic endoscope imaging (ScopeGuide) elucidates the mechanism of action of the pain-alleviating impact of water exchange colonoscopy – attenuation of loop formation. J Interv Gastroenterol 2012; 2: 142-146
• 25 Garborg KK, Loberg M, Matre J. et al. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 740-746
• 26 Suzuki T, Matsushima M, Tsukune Y. et al. Double-balloon endoscopy versus magnet-imaging enhanced colonoscopy for difficult colonoscopies, a randomized study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 38-42
• 27 Cadoni S, Leung FW. Water-assisted colonoscopy. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2017; 15: 135-154
• 28 May F, Shaukat A. State of the science on quality indicators for colonoscopy and how to achieve them. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 1183-1190
• 29 Cadoni S, Gallittu P, Sanna S. et al. A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 212-218
• 30 Lesne A, Rouquette O, Touzet S. et al. Adenoma detection with blue-water infusion colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 765-775
• 31 Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F. et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline – update 2019. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 775-794
• 32 Calderwood AH, Schroy 3rd PC. et al. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores provide a standardized definition of adequate for describing bowel cleanliness. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 269-276
• 33 Singh S, Singh PP, Murad MH. et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1375-1389