Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2022; 130(07): 475-483
DOI: 10.1055/a-1493-2324
Article

Evaluation of Meal Carbohydrate Counting Errors in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

1   Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Collin Krauss
1   Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Delia Waldenmaier
1   Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Christina Liebing
1   Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Nina Jendrike
1   Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Josef Högel
2   Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Institut für Humangenetik, Ulm, Germany
,
Boris M. Pfeiffer
3   ReferArt, Darmstadt, Germany
,
Cornelia Haug
1   Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Guido Freckmann
1   Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Aim Correct estimation of meal carbohydrate content is a prerequisite for successful intensified insulin therapy in patients with diabetes. In this survey, the counting error in adult patients with type 1 diabetes was investigated.

Methods Seventy-four patients with type 1 diabetes estimated the carbohydrate content of 24 standardized test meals. The test meals were categorized into 1 of 3 groups with different carbohydrate content: low, medium, and high. Estimation results were compared with the meals’ actual carbohydrate content as determined by calculation based on weighing. A subgroup of the participants estimated the test meals for a second (n=35) and a third time (n=22) with a mean period of 11 months between the estimations.

Results During the first estimation, the carbohydrate content was underestimated by −28% (−50, 0) of the actual carbohydrate content. Particularly meals with high mean carbohydrate content were underestimated by −34% (−56, −13). Median counting error improved significantly when estimations were performed for a second time (p<0.001).

Conclusions Participants generally underestimated the carbohydrate content of the test meals, especially in meals with higher carbohydrate content. Repetition of estimation resulted in significant improvements in estimation accuracy and is important for the maintenance of correct carbohydrate estimations. The ability to estimate the carbohydrate content of a meal should be checked and trained regularly in patients with diabetes.



Publication History

Received: 09 December 2020
Received: 11 March 2021

Accepted: 13 April 2021

Article published online:
25 May 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany