Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2021; 49(01): 29-42
DOI: 10.1055/a-1322-9439
Übersichtsartikel

Diagnostik der Epilepsie – Möglichkeiten der Magnetresonanztomografie

Diagnostics in epilepsy – potential of magnetic resonance imaging
Jana C. Drexlin
1   Abteilung für Klinische Neurologie, Departement für klinische Veterinärmedizin, Vetsuisse Fakultät, Universität Bern, Schweiz
,
Daniela Schweizer
2   Abteilung für Klinische Radiologie, Departement für klinische Veterinärmedizin, Vetsuisse Fakultät, Universität Bern, Schweiz
,
Veronika M. Stein
1   Abteilung für Klinische Neurologie, Departement für klinische Veterinärmedizin, Vetsuisse Fakultät, Universität Bern, Schweiz
› Author Affiliations

Zusammenfassung

Epilepsie ist eine neurologische Erkrankung, die dem Kleintierpraktiker im klinischen Alltag häufig begegnet. Die Erkrankung umfasst eine Vielzahl klinischer Ausprägungen und Ätiologien und die klinische Aufarbeitung bedarf in vielen Fällen einer kostenaufwendigen und umfangreichen Diagnostik. Diese ist notwendig, um eine metabolische Ursache für die Krampfanfälle festzustellen oder auszuschließen bzw. zwischen idiopathischer und struktureller Epilepsie unterscheiden zu können. Für die Klassifikation der Epilepsie ist die Untersuchung mittels Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) ein zentraler Bestandteil der Diagnosefindung, die sich entscheidend auf Therapie und Prognose auswirkt. Die Standardisierung von MRT-Protokollen hat große Bedeutung, um eine einheitliche Untersuchung und vergleichbare Ergebnisse zu erzielen. Dies kann die Kommunikation und Interaktion zwischen klinischen Einrichtungen erleichtern und die Möglichkeit bieten, noch unerkannte strukturelle Veränderungen im MRT zu erfassen. Dieser Übersichtsartikel beschäftigt sich im Zentralen mit der Definition und Klassifikation der Epilepsie sowie der bildgebenden Diagnostik der Epilepsie beim Hund und nimmt Bezug auf Statistiken und Empfehlungen von Spezialisten zur klinischen Fallaufarbeitung.

Abstract

Epilepsy is a common neurologic disease frequently encountered by small animal practitioners. The disease comprises a multiplicity of clinical presentations and etiologies and often necessitates a comprehensive as well as cost-intensive diagnostic workup. This is mandatory in order to be able to diagnose or exclude a metabolic cause of the seizures and to distinguish between idiopathic and structural epilepsy. The examination by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a central component of the diagnostic workup, which in turn has essential effects on treatment and prognosis. In order to achieve standardized examination and comparable results, it is of utmost importance to use defined MRI protocols. Accordingly, communication and interaction between clinical institutions may be facilitated and as of yet undetected structural changes might be recorded in future MRI techniques. This review article sets particularly emphasis on the definition and classification of epilepsy as well as its diagnostic imaging procedures and refers to statistics and specialists’ recommendations for the diagnostic workup in dogs.



Publication History

Received: 07 July 2020

Accepted: 29 October 2020

Article published online:
15 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Berendt M, Farquhar RG, Mandigers PJ. et al. International veterinary epilepsy task force consensus report on epilepsy definition, classification and terminology in companion animals. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11: 182
  • 2 Heske L, Nødtvedt A, Jäderlund KH. et al. A cohort study of epilepsy among 665,000 insured dogs: incidence, mortality and survival after diagnosis. Vet J 2014; 202 (03) 471-476
  • 3 Schriefl S, Steinberg TA, Matiasek K. et al. Etiologic classification of seizures, signalment, clinical signs, and outcome in cats with seizure disorders: 91 cases (2000–2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233 (10) 1591-1597
  • 4 Shorvon Simon D. The first 100 years of the ILAE (1909–2009): Its landmarks, achievements, and challenges. Epilepsia Open 2019; 4 (02) 237-246
  • 5 De Lahunta A. Seizure Disorders: Narcolepsy. In: De Lahunta A, Glass E, Kent M. eds. Veterinary Neuroanatomy and Clinical Neurology. 4th ed.. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2015: 476-498
  • 6 Thomas WB. Idiopathic epilepsy in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2010; 40 (01) 161-179
  • 7 De Risio L, Bhatti S, Muñana K. et al. International veterinary epilepsy task force consensus proposal: diagnostic approach to epilepsy in dogs. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11: 148
  • 8 Armaşu M, Packer RM, Cook S. et al. An exploratory study using a statistical approach as a platform for clinical reasoning in canine epilepsy. Vet J 2014; 202 (02) 292-296
  • 9 Packer R, Berendt M, Bhatti S. et al. Inter-observer agreement of canine and feline paroxysmal event semiology and classification by veterinary neurology specialists and non-specialists. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11 (01) 39
  • 10 Platt S. Mimics of Seizure Activity: Disorders Confused with Epilepsy. In: De Risio L, Platt S. eds. Canine and Feline Epilepsy. Oxfordshire: CABI; 2014: 244-273
  • 11 Kwiatkowska M, Hoppe S, Pomianowski A.. et al. Reactive seizures in cats: A retrospective study of 64 cases. Vet J 2019; 244: 1-6
  • 12 Brauer C, Jambroszyk M, Tipold A. Metabolic and toxic causes of canine seizure disorders: A retrospective study of 96 cases. Vet J 2011; 187 (02) 272-275
  • 13 Rusbridge C, Long S, Jovanovik J. et al. International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force recommendations for a veterinary epilepsy-specific MRI protocol. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11: 194
  • 14 Hülsmeyer VI, Fischer A, Mandigers PJ. et al. International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force’s current understanding of idiopathic epilepsy of genetic or suspected genetic origin in purebred dogs. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11: 175
  • 15 De Risio L. Structural Epilepsy. In: De Risio L, Platt S. eds. Canine and Feline Epilepsy. Oxfordshire: CABI; 2014: 101-206
  • 16 Pákozdy A, Leschnik M, Sarchahi AA. et al. Clinical comparison of primary versus secondary epilepsy in 125 cats. J Feline Med Surg 2010; 12 (12) 910-916
  • 17 Smith PM, Talbot CE, Jeffery ND. Findings on low-field cranial MR images in epileptic dogs that lack interictal neurological deficits. Vet J 2008; 176 (03) 320-325
  • 18 Pákozdy A, Leschnik M, Tichy AG. et al. Retrospective clinical comparison of idiopathic versus symptomatic epilepsy in 240 dogs with seizures. Acta Vet Hung 2008; 56 (04) 471-483
  • 19 Hülsmeyer V, Zimmermann R, Brauer C. et al. Epilepsy in Border Collies: clinical manifestation, outcome, and mode of inheritance. J Vet Intern Med 2010; 24 (01) 171-178
  • 20 Fredsø N, Koch BC, Toft N. et al. Risk factors for survival in a university hospital population of dogs with epilepsy. J Vet Intern Med 2014; 28 (06) 1782-1788
  • 21 Mai W. Technical Particularities with Low-Field Imaging. In: Mai W. ed. Diagnostic MRI in Dogs and Cats. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018: 153-157
  • 22 Mehan Jr WA, González RG, Buchbinder BR. et al. Optimal brain MRI protocol for new neurological complaint. PLoS One 2014; 9 (10) e110803
  • 23 Hecht S. Optimized Technique: Brain. In: Mai W. ed. Diagnostic MRI in Dogs and Cats. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018: 88-105
  • 24 Estey CM, Dewey CW, Rishniw M. et al. A Subset of Dogs with Presumptive Idiopathic Epilepsy Show Hippocampal Asymmetry: A Volumetric Comparison with Non-Epileptic Dogs Using MRI. Front Vet Sci 2017; 4: 183
  • 25 Von Oertzen J, Urbach H, Jungbluth S. et al. Standard magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73 (06) 643-647
  • 26 Ives EJ, Rousset N, Heliczer N. et al. Exclusion of a brain lesion: is intravenous contrast administration required after normal precontrast magnetic resonance imaging?. J Vet Intern Med 2014; 28 (02) 522-528
  • 27 Richter H, Bücker P, Dunker C. et al. Gadolinium deposition in the brain of dogs after multiple intravenous administrations of linear gadolinium based contrast agents. PLoS One 2020; 15 (02) e0227649
  • 28 Bagley RS, Gavin PR, Moore MP. et al. Clinical signs associated with brain tumors in dogs: 97 cases (1992–1997). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 215 (06) 818-819
  • 29 Dunn-Pirio AM, Billakota S, Peters KB. Postictal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes Masquerading as Brain Tumor Progression: A Case Series. Case Rep Oncol 2016; 9 (02) 358-362
  • 30 Snyder JM, Shofer FS, Van Winkle TJ. et al. Canine intracranial primary neoplasia: 173 cases (1986–2003). J Vet Intern Med 2006; 20 (03) 669-675
  • 31 De Risio L. Clinical and Diagnostic Investigation of the Seizure Patient. In: De Risio L, Platt S. eds. Canine and Feline Epilepsy. Oxfordshire: CABI; 2014: 274-324
  • 32 Wisner ER, Dickinson PJ, Higgins RJ. Magnetic resonance imaging features of canine intracranial neoplasia. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011; 52 (01) (Suppl. 01) S52-S61
  • 33 Schwartz M, Lamb CR, Brodbelt DC. et al. Canine intracranial neoplasia: clinical risk factors for development of epileptic seizures. J Small Anim Pract 2011; 52 (12) 632-637
  • 34 Cherubini GB, Mantis P, Martinez TA. et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic brain lesions in dogs and cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46 (05) 384-387
  • 35 Leclerc MK, d’Anjou MA, Blond L. et al. Interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of brain magnetic resonance imaging in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013; 242 (12) 1688-1695
  • 36 Kaczmarska A, José-López R, Czopowicz M. et al. Postencephalitic epilepsy in dogs with meningoencephalitis of unknown origin: Clinical features, risk factors, and long-term outcome. J Vet Intern Med 2020; 34 (02) 808-820
  • 37 Young B. Encephalitis/Meningoencephalitis. In: Mai W. ed. Diagnostic MRI in Dogs and Cats. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018: 187-210
  • 38 Steinmetz S, Tipold A, Löscher W. Epilepsy after head injury in dogs: a natural model of posttraumatic epilepsy. Epilepsia 2013; 54 (04) 580-588
  • 39 Lowrie M, De Risio L, Dennis R. et al. Concurrent medical conditions and long-term outcome in dogs with nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012; 53 (04) 381-388
  • 40 Garosi L, McConnell JE, Platt SR. et al. Results of diagnostic investigations and long-term outcome of 33 dogs with brain infarction (2000–2004). J Vet Intern Med 2005; 19 (05) 725-731
  • 41 Hecht S. Metabolic and Degenerative Encephalopathies. In: Mai W. ed. Diagnostic MRI in Dogs and Cats. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2018: 172-186
  • 42 Mellema LM, Koblik PD, Kortz GD. et al. Reversible magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in dogs following seizures. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999; 40 (06) 588-595
  • 43 Bhatti SF, De Risio L, Muñana K. et al. International Veterinary Epilepsy Task Force consensus proposal: medical treatment of canine epilepsy in Europe. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11: 176
  • 44 Potschka H, Fischer A, Löscher W. et al. International veterinary epilepsy task force consensus proposal: outcome of therapeutic interventions in canine and feline epilepsy. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11: 177
  • 45 Volk HA. Pathophysiology of Pharmacoresistant Epilepsy. In: De Risio L, Platt S. eds. Canine and Feline Epilepsy. Oxfordshire: CABI; 2014: 28-38
  • 46 De Risio L. Classification of Seizures and Epilepsies. In: De Risio L, Platt S. eds. Canine and Feline Epilepsy. Oxfordshire: CABI; 2014: 39-53
  • 47 Muñana KR. Management of refractory epilepsy. Top Companion Anim Med 2013; 28 (02) 67-71
  • 48 Mohan M, Keller S, Nicolson A. et al. The long-term outcomes of epilepsy surgery. PLoS One 2018; 13 (05) e0196274
  • 49 Hasegawa D. Diagnostic techniques to detect the epileptogenic zone: Pathophysiological and presurgical analysis of epilepsy in dogs and cats. Vet J 2016; 215: 64-75
  • 50 Packer RM, Shihab NK, Torres BB. et al. Clinical risk factors associated with anti-epileptic drug responsiveness in canine epilepsy. PLoS One 2014; 9 (08) e106026
  • 51 Hartmann A, von Klopmann C, Lautenschläger IE. et al. Quantitative analysis of brain perfusion parameters in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy by use of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Vet Res 2018; 79 (04) 433-442
  • 52 Kiefer C, Abela E, Schindler K. et al. Focal Epilepsy: MR Imaging of Nonhemodynamic Field Effects by Using a Phase-cycled Stimulus-induced Rotary Saturation Approach with Spin-Lock Preparation. Radiology 2016; 280 (01) 237-243
  • 53 Unger D, Wiest R, Kiefer C. et al. Neuronal current imaging – an experimental imaging method to investigate electric currents in canine idiopathic epilepsy. J Vet Intern Med. (submitted)
  • 54 Raimondi F, Shihab N, Gutierrez-Quintana R. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in epileptic cats with a normal interictal neurological examination: 188 cases. Vet Rec 2017; 180 (25) 610
  • 55 Arrol L, Penderis J, Garosi L. et al. Aetiology and long-term outcome of juvenile epilepsy in 136 dogs. Vet Rec 2012; 170 (13) 335