Key words injury risk - racing - practice - shoulder injuries - concussion
Introduction
Mountain biking is a hugely popular sport and it has continued to grow, from its birth
in California in 1973 [1 ], to the first International Cycling Union (UCI) World Championship event in Colorado
in 1990 and to an Olympic Sport in Atlanta in 1996. Disciplines have traditionally
consisted of cross-country, downhill and freeride. However, recent years have seen
the emergence of a new mountain bike discipline called enduro. The essence of ‘enduro’
or ‘all mountain’ riding has been undertaken by recreational riders for many years,
and the rise of unofficial locally built trails over the last few years has seen the
growth of enduro as a sport. In 2013 the first competitive, international race series
was started by the Enduro World Series (EWS), and in 2019, enduro mountain biking
also became the newest International Cycling Union recognized event.
Enduro racing consists of a series of stages, with time limited uphill riding (transitions)
followed by race timed steep and technical downhill riding (stages). The fastest cumulative
stage times determining the winner. Successful athletes need to have the ability to
negotiate technical terrain following large anaerobic bursts of effort, which can
occur both within the stages, and during the transition phases between stages (e. g.
to avoid late stage start-time penalties) [2 ]. This cumulative demand places high loads, on both physical and cognitive systems
and can lead to errors when piloting the bike over technical terrain. As a new sport
the risk of injury in enduro is currently unknown. There is an increasing recognition
of the importance of injury recording from international governing bodies [3 ]
[4 ]
[5 ]
[6 ]
[7 ]. Understanding the magnitude and nature of injury in sport is an important first
step in developing and implementing prevention initiatives and reducing the risk associated
with sport participation.
Studies reporting injury patterns in mountain biking have covered different disciplines
(or sometimes combined) and employed varied methodologies. For example, studies have
included off-road bicycling [8 ]
[9 ]
[10 ]
[11 ], Mountain Bike park riding [12 ], mountain stage racing [13 ] and downhill and cross-country mountain biking [7 ]
[8 ]
[10 ]
[14 ]
[15 ]. Studies range from recreational riding [9 ]
[16 ], training and race practice [7 ]
[15 ]
[17 ] and racing [7 ]
[8 ]
[14 ]
[15 ]
[17 ] in youth [18 ] and amateur and elite riders [7 ]
[8 ]
[13 ]
[14 ]
[15 ]
[16 ]
[17 ]. Clinical studies have reported severe mountain bike injuries presenting to hospital
[9 ]
[19 ], and retrospective and prospective questionnaire studies have presented self-reported
rider injuries during competitive and recreational riding [10 ]
[11 ]
[13 ]
[16 ]
[17 ].
To date there have been no prospective longitudinal studies on elite level competitive
mountain biking and none in enduro. The aim of the present study was to describe the
incidence, severity and nature of injury among mountain bike riders participating
in the Enduro World Series.
Material and Methods
This was a two-season prospective epidemiological study collecting rider injury data
between March 2017 and September 2018 from ten Enduro World Series (EWS) tier 1 race
events. Data were collected from events in 2017 in Ireland, Madeira, New Zealand,
Australia, and in 2018 in Canada, Chile, Italy (La Thuile and Finale Ligure), France,
and Slovenia/Austria. Rider registration and results data were provided by the EWS
organizers and rider medical data recorded by medical staff at each EWS event.
Participants
All riders participating in the EWS during the 10 EWS events, including male and female
riders, across all race categories, e. g. under 21 (17–20 years), senior professional,
and masters (35+/40 + years female; 40+years male), were included in the study.
Detailed study information including information on data handling and confidentiality
was provided on the EWS website and in rider emails as part of their EWS race registration.
It was outlined that rider consent was implicit through their registration and participation
in each EWS event. The study was approved by the School of Applied Sciences research
ethics committee at Edinburgh Napier University (SAS/0035). The study meets the ethical
standards cited for the International Journal of Sports Medicine [20 ].
Implementation
Event chief medical officers and on-course medical staff were provided with an injury
reporting questionnaire, in both paper and electronic formats. Data were recorded
for any injury that occurred from the start of first practice to the end of the final
race stage. Rider race exposure (hours) were provided from EWS race result time sheets.
Rider practice times were estimated by EWS organizers based on the venue and number
of stages.
Each rider was assigned a unique study identifying number (rider ID), which was utilized
only for the purposes of identifying duplicate injury entries, and for tracking rider
data across multiple races/seasons (e. g. multiple injuries per rider). The database
was fully de-identified immediately after end of the 2018 season. Confidentiality
and anonymity of rider information was ensured at all times.
Injury recording
Questionnaires were developed in line with previous sports injury surveillance methodologies
and categories [15 ]
[21 ]. Rider ID, race category and event, date of injury and estimated time loss from
competition or training were recorded. The anatomical location, injury type (e. g.
structure), cause and onset of injury, i. e. during practice or racing, transition
or stage, were recorded. In addition, the trail surface (rocky, dirt, etc.), profile
(steep, flat, etc.) and speed (0–20 km, 21–40 km, etc.), and protective equipment
worn were also reported. Injury was defined as any rider injury incurred in practice
or racing during the event and receiving medical attention, regardless of the consequence
with respect to absence from competition or training [21 ]. If a rider sustained an injury during one stage/transition, and another during
a different stage/transition, they were reported as two injuries. If a rider sustained
multiple injuries during the same injury event, only the most severe was recorded.
Injury severity was reported in days of estimated absence.
Data analysis
Descriptive data are presented as frequencies (number or proportions) for categorical
variables and mean for numerical variables. Severity data were not normally distributed
and so median and mean are presented together, the latter to allow comparison to other
studies. Injury prevalence is presented as the number of injured riders relative to
the total number of riders (%). Injury incidence is presented as the number of injuries
per 100 riders [7 ]
[15 ], and per 1000 hours exposure with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Differences in
severity were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U, and incidence rates between groups using
Two-tailed Z tests [22 ]. Significance was accepted at p<0.05 (equal variances assumed).
Results
Overall, 2010 riders (females 198; males 1,812) representing 46 countries participated
across the 10 EWS races during the 2017 and 2018 seasons. A total of 249 riders competed
in both seasons, and 1411 riders only ever competed in one EWS race. In total, there
were 3082 rider race hours and 18 379 rider practice hours.
Injuries by category and sex
A total of 188 injuries (females n=24; males n=164) were reported in 179 riders, with
seven riders experiencing two injuries and one rider three injuries ([Table 1 ]). 8.9% of riders competing across the 10 EWS events sustained at least one injury,
equivalent to 9.3 injuries per 100 riders. 57% of injuries were reported to result
in time-loss (n=108). On average 12.3 days (median 5 days) were lost per injury. The
severity of injury was significantly lower for female professional versus male professional
riders (p=0.01). The majority of injuries (63%) occurred during race stages and the
remainder (36%) during practice (for 3 injuries the onset was unknown). The incidence
of injury was higher in racing (38.3 injuries per 1000 race hours; 95% CI 31.4 to
45.2), compared with practice (3.6 practice injuries per 1000 practice hours; 95%
CI 2.8 to 4.5; p=<0.01) and higher for u21 men versus professional men (p=<0.01).
Table 1 Injuries by race category and sex.
Race Category
No. of riders
No. of injuries (r/p)
Severity mean days (& median)
No. riders injured (%)
Inj/1000 race hrs (95% CI)
Inj/1000 practice hrs (95% CI)
Male Pro
1224
106 (61/44)
14.9 (7)
102 (8.3)
33.1 (24.8 to 41.4)
3.8 (2.7 to 4.9)
Male u21
277
33 (28/4)
11.2 (0)
31 (11.2)
72.5 (45.7 to 99.4)*
1.7 (0.1 to 3.4)
Male Masters
330
25 (15/9)
8.7 (2)
25 (7.6)
35.0 (17.3 to 52.7)
3.8 (1.3 to 6.3)
Male total
1831
164 (104/57)
b
13.2 (7)
157 (8.6)c
39.1 (31.6 to 46.6)
3.5 (2.6 to 4.4)
Female Pro
150
24 (14/10)
5.8 (0)*
22 (14.7)
41.5 (19.8 to 63.2)
5.8 (2.2 to 9.3)
Female u21
19
−
−
−
−
−
Female Masters
29
−
−
−
−
−
Female total
198
24 (14/10)
5.8 (0)
22 (11.1)
33.1 (15.8 to 50.5)
4.7 (1.8 to 7.6)
Grand Total
2029a
188 (118/67)b
12.3 (5.0)
179 (8.9)c
38.3 (31.4 to 45.2)
3.6 (2.8 to 4.5)*
r=race, p=practice; a 19 riders raced in more than one category, i. e. as U21 then senior, senior then masters;
b onset unknown for 3 injuries; c one rider had injuries competing in Male u21 and Male Pro;*significant difference.
Injuries by location and type
The shoulder (12.8% of all injuries) followed by the head (9.0%), hand (9.0%) and
lower leg (8.0%) were the most commonly injured body locations ([Table 2 ]). The thoracic spine (45 days), thumb (34 days), shoulder (26 days) and ankle (23
days) were the most severely injured. The most common types of injuries were lacerations/abrasion/skin
lesion (26% of all injuries) followed by contusion/hematoma/bruise (19.2%) and fracture
(traumatic) (17.7%), with the latter the most severe type of injury (34 days). Concussion
was the most commonly reported injury diagnosis (7.4% of all injuries), followed by
lower leg (5.9%) and forearm (5.3%) lacerations, shoulder/clavicle fractures (4.7%)
and hand fractures (4.7%). Shoulder/clavicle fractures were also among the most severe
injuries (49 days), alongside one thoracic spine fracture (90 days) and two ankle
fractures (50 days). Overall, shoulder/clavicle fractures caused the greatest burden,
with a total of 442 days lost.
Table 2 Number of injuries by body location and injury type, with severity mean days (in
brackets).
Concussion
Contusion/hematoma/bruise
Dislocation/subluxation
Fracture (traumatic)
Laceration/abrasion/skin lesion
Ligament rupture
Sprain (joint and/or ligaments)
Strain (muscle rupture/tear)
Other
Unknown
Grand Total
ankle
1 (−)
2 (50)
1 (−)
1 (−)
3 (16.7)
8 (23.1)
elbow
4 (5.5)
1 (−)
1 (−)
7 (0)
1 (−)
14 (5.1)
face (incl. eye, ear, nose)
5 (1.4)
6 (1.2)
finger
1 (−)
1 (−)
3 (26.6)
1 (−)
4 (26.3)
1 (−)
11 (18.1)
forearm
10 (6.3)
1 (−)
11 (5.7)
hand
4 (8)
9 (17.9)
4 (3.8)
17 (12.2)
head
14 (5.1)
1 (−)
3 (4.0)
17 (5.4)
hip
2 (0.5)
1 (−)
1 (−)
2 (7.5)
6 (4.0)
knee
3 (5.7)
6 (11.2)
1 (−)
3 (6.7)
13 (8.0)
lower leg
2 (3.5)
2 (50.0)
11 (6.4)
15 (11.8)
lumbar spine
2 (8.5)
1 (−)
3 (0)
6 (4.5)
neck/ cervical spine
2 (0)
1 (−)
1 (−)
4 (0)
pelvis/scrum/buttock/SIJ
1 (−)
1 (−)
2 (0)
shoulder/ clavicle
3 (2.3)
5 (16)
9 (49.1)
1 (−)
1 (−)
1 (−)
1 (−)
3 (5.0)
24 (26.0)
sternum/ ribs
2 (15)
2 (25.5)
1 (−)
1 (−)
6 (13.5)
thigh
3 (3.3)
1 (−)
1 (−)
5 (8.0)
thoracic spine
1 (−)
1 (−)
2 (45.0)
thumb
2 (30)
2 (45.0)
1 (−)
5 (34.0)
upper arm
1 (−)
2 (5.0)
3 (5.7)
wrist
2 (0)
3 (35.0)
1 (−)
6 (17.5)
unknown
1 (−)
1 (−)
1 (−)
1 (−)
4 (2.5)
Grand Total
14 (5.1)
35 (4.7)
9 (17.8)
36 (35.0)
51 (4.8)
5 (16.0)
7 (19.0)
6 (10.8)
5 (1.4)
20 (6.1)
188a (12.3)
a 1 injury each for abdomen, foot/toe and groin not presented; severity data<2 injuries
not presented.
Cause of injuries
Just over half of all injuries (55%) occurred during rocky stages, 39% on steep gradients
and 41% at slow speeds ([Fig. 1 ]). Injuries occurred most frequently on a combination of slow, steep, rocky/dirt
stages (22.3%, n=42) ([Fig. 2 ] shows an example of an incident during practice in Madeira, on a steep, dirt stage).
71% were caused by a fall (contact with the ground). 55.7% of injuries resulted in
a rider who either did-not-start (DNS) or did-not-finish (DNF). Of those who were injured during the event, 39.4% continued racing. A third
(31.2%) of the injuries occurred to riders who only competed in one EWS event.
Fig. 1 Percentage of injuries occurring by type of stage.
Fig. 2 Injuries occurred most frequently on steep, dirt/rocky stages.
Around two-thirds of hand fractures (66%), shoulder dislocations (60%) and half of
all shoulder/clavicle fractures (56%) and concussions (50%) occurred on steep, rocky
stages. Of those experiencing concussion during racing (n=12; 11 males, 1 female),
four riders completed the race (33.3%), and six had no time loss reported post-race
(50.0%). Half of all concussions occurred in riders who only ever participated in
one EWS race.
Discussion
This is the first prospective longitudinal study on medical practitioner reported
injuries in enduro mountain bike riders. The aims were to describe the incidence,
severity and nature of injuries among riders participating in the Enduro World Series
across two-seasons (2017 & 2018). The main findings were 1) 8.9% of riders sustained
at least one injury; 2) the incidence of injury was higher in racing (38.3 race injuries
per 1000 race hours), compared with practice (3.6 practice injuries per 1000 practice
hours); 3) concussion injuries were most frequent and shoulder/clavicle fractures
caused the greatest burden, and 4) significant injuries were most common on slow,
steep and rocky/dirt stages.
Rate of injury
To date there have been few prospective studies on mountain biking injuries and no
other injury studies on enduro mountain biking for comparison. Overall, the prevalence
of injury was low with 8.9% of riders injured (race and practice combined) across
the two seasons, and this was lower than that reported in a retrospective study on
downhill riders, where approximately 80% of World-Cup and 50% of recreational riders
reported at least one significant injury during the previous two years [16 ]. The prevalence of injury was also lower compared with the Swiss Epic multi-stage
cross-country event (71%) [13 ] and cross-country mountain biking at the Olympic Games, where during the 3-week
event 16% of mountain bike athletes at London 2012 and 24% at Rio 2016 were reported
to be injured [7 ]
[15 ]. However, when taking into account the amount of time (hours) spent exposed to enduro
racing, the risk of injury was similar or higher compared to previous studies. For
example, race injury incidence in the present study was similar to the 43/1000 hours
reported in downhill racing in the US [14 ] and higher than the 20/1000 hours reported in downhill riders from Germany, Luxembourg,
Switzerland and Austria [17 ]. The rate of injury was also higher compared to that reported previously in cross-country
mountain bike racing (4.0/1000 hours racing) [8 ].
The rate of injury is understood to be influenced by several factors. A combination
of high speeds and steep, technical terrain may increase the risk of injury, for example,
in downhill and enduro riding compared with that of cross-country mountain biking
[16 ]. The level of riding will also influence results, e. g. recreational riding versus
competitive racing, and regional versus International level riders, where the technicality
of events and intensity of competition in the latter may be greater. In addition,
methodological differences may influence results [23 ]. For example, prospective studies [9 ]
[17 ] versus retrospective studies [16 ], which may be subject to recall bias [24 ]. The length of study recording, such as single event, single season [9 ]
[17 ] or multiple season studies [11 ]
[16 ], and the definition of injury, e. g. hospital attendance [9 ] versus time-loss [8 ] versus medical-attention [13 ]
[17 ]. Finally, how injuries are recorded, whether by medical professional or rider self-reported
surveys [10 ]
[11 ]
[17 ], may also influence the number and rate of injuries presented. The data recording
methods in the present study were adapted from the IOC surveillance methodology to
ensure consistency of results and allow comparison to other sports injury studies
[7 ]
[15 ]
[21 ]. To date few studies that have employed consensus methodologies for injury recording
[17 ]
[18 ], and it is recommended that future mountain bike injury research include standardized
definitions and data recording methods [25 ].
Type of injury
In the present study the shoulder, followed by the head, hand and lower leg were the
most commonly injured body locations, and the most frequent injury types were lacerations/abrasions/skin
lesions followed by contusion/hematoma/bruise, and (traumatic) fractures. These findings
are consistent with previous studies in downhill and cross-country mountain biking
[8 ]
[10 ]
[11 ]
[14 ]
[17 ]. Also in line with results reported previously, the most frequent injury diagnoses
in the current study were concussions (7.3% of all injuries), lower leg (5.7%) and
forearm (5.2%) lacerations, and shoulder/clavicle fractures (4.7%). Overall, shoulder/clavicle
(total of 442 days lost), hand (161 days lost) and wrist fractures (105 days lost)
caused the greatest burden [8 ]
[10 ]
[11 ]
[12 ]
[14 ]
[17 ]. Shoulder/clavicle fractures were also predominant in a UK trauma department study,
where they accounted for 25% of all mountain biking-related injuries in riders presenting
to hospital [9 ], confirming both their prevalence and severity. For concussion, the proportion of
injuries in the current study (10.2% of all racing injuries) was similar to that reported
previously in downhill racers in the US (9.0% of all racing injuries) [8 ]. Compared with other professional sports, the incidence of concussion injury in
enduro (3.9 injuries per 1000 hours racing) was slightly higher than football (2.4
per 1000 match hours) [26 ], but lower than rugby (15.8 to 18.4 per 1000 match hours) [27 ]
[28 ].
Awareness of athlete concussion and its short and long-term consequences is increasing
in a number of sports, including mountain biking, where there have been a series of
high-profile injuries [29 ]. A lack of concussion recognition, including delayed symptom presentation (sometimes
up to 48 h post injury), may result in both under reporting of concussion injury and
a subsequent lack of appropriate care. If standard concussion return-to-play (RTP)
protocols are followed 7 days should be the minimum time prior to return to normal
mountain bike activity [30 ]. However, in the present study the estimated mean days lost was 5.1 days per concussion
injury. This suggests riders may not have been taking adequate time off for recovery,
and the results seem to confirm this whereby almost a third of riders were reported
to complete their race, and a third to take no time off at all post injury. With a
previous concussion known to increase the risk of future concussion [31 ]
[32 ], awareness and treatment of concussion injury, including following structured RTP
guidelines, in line with the recent concussion injury consensus are crucial [30 ].
Limitations
Unlike racing, it was not possible to directly measure rider practice exposure (hours),
and so a composite indirect measure was calculated based on the number of stages and
terrain at each event. Hence, despite the lower prevalence presented in practice compared
with racing, which the authors believe to be true, race practice injury rates should
be interpreted with caution. It is clear enduro is dominated by acute/traumatic injuries.
However, the methodology employed in this study may miss the recording of some chronic/overuse
issues, i. e. those injuries causing pain and limitations in performance, around the
knee and lumbar spine, as previously reported [33 ]
[34 ]
[35 ]
[36 ]. Results presented in some categories were affected by sparse data bias [37 ]. Hence for severity data (days lost) median values were presented alongside mean
(as the traditional measure of severity). Finally, the present descriptive study does
not provide direct causal association.
Practical application – injury prevention initiatives
In response to the study findings mountain bike rider concussion education and recognition
resources, including detailed return-to-riding (RTR) guidelines, were developed and made freely available on the EWS website targeting
professional and recreational riders, and race event organizers [38 ]
[39 ]. Recommendations were made for a rider head injury assessment protocol to be implemented,
and this has been used by medical staff in all EWS events [40 ]. In addition, a new rider concussion withdrawal protocol was included in the EWS
race rules. Other recommendations suggest additional medical provision should be targeted
by race organizers around steep dirt/rocky race stages, where the more severe injuries
tend to occur, and for the course designers to re-assess design of some of these technical
sections. Riders should wear equipment to protect against lower leg and forearm lacerations
and abrasions, and the mountain bike industry may consider future development of enduro
specific shoulder protection products [41 ]. Finally, new qualification criteria (qualifier and challenger events) were introduced
to decrease the number of first-time, only-time riders competing in EWS tier 1 events
(i. e. those who may be more frequently injured), to ensure riders possessed sufficient
skill and experience to compete at that level [42 ].
Conclusions
This study provides unique insight into the risk of injury in elite level enduro mountain
biking, reporting injuries from over 2000 riders from 46 countries, across two seasons.
Objective data from the study should be used to help target injury prevention initiatives
in enduro mountain biking. Ongoing monitoring of injuries, as the patterns of mountain
biking injuries continue to emerge in this relatively new discipline, and the inclusion
of robust risk factor studies, may help inform future injury prevention strategies.
While it is important to understand the risk of injury at elite level enduro, previous
mountain bike studies have reported that most injuries occur in recreational rather
than competitive riding [9 ]. Hence future research investigating the incidence and nature of enduro mountain
biking injuries in amateur and recreational riders is also advocated.
