Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000023.xml
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2020; 52(04): 310-315
DOI: 10.1055/a-1205-1309
DOI: 10.1055/a-1205-1309
Consensus Statement
Perioperatives Management in der Mikrochirurgie – Konsensus-Statement der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße
Zusammenfassung
Das perioperative Management in der Mikrochirurgie ist ein wesentlicher Bestandteil einer erfolgreichen rekonstruktiven Chirurgie. Im deutschsprachigen Raum herrschen hierzu keine einheitlichen Konzepte und die individuellen Schemata unterscheiden sich wie in der Expertenbefragung erhoben deutlich voneinander. Im Zuge der 41. Jahrestagung der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie (DAM) im November 2019 in München wurden Konzepte evaluiert, eine Befragung durchgeführt und mithilfe einer Literaturrecherche als Positionspapier zusammengefasst.
Abstract
Perioperative management in microsurgery is a key element of success in reconstructive surgery. There are no uniform concepts for this in the German-speaking countries and individual schemes differ significantly from each other, as ascertained in an expert survey. In the course of the 41st Annual Conference of the German-speaking Working Group for Microsurgery (DAM) held in Munich in November 2019, concepts were evaluated and a survey was carried out and summarised as a position paper in due consideration of the scientific literature.
Schlüsselwörter
Brustchirurgie - freie Lappenplastiken < Mikrochirurgie - bildgebende Verfahren < Sonstige AspektePublication History
Received: 02 March 2020
Accepted: 16 June 2020
Article published online:
21 August 2020
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York
-
Literatur
- 1 Koshima I, Yamamoto T, Narushima M. et al. Perforator Flaps and Supermicrosurgery. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37: 683-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2010.06.009.
- 2 Chao AH, Lamp S. Current Approaches to Free Flap Monitoring. Plast Surg Nurs 2014; 34: 52-6 doi:10.1097/PSN.0000000000000037
- 3 Chao AH, Meyerson J, Povoski SP. et al. A review of devices used in the monitoring of microvascular free tissue transfers. Expert Rev Med Devices 2013; 10: 649-60 DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2013.827527.
- 4 Stranix JT, Lee Z-H, Jacoby A. et al. Forty Years of Lower Extremity Take-Backs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141: 1282-7 DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004322.
- 5 Wallner C, Drysch M, Hahn SA. et al. Alterations in pectoralis muscle cell characteristics after radiation of the human breast in situ. J Radiat Res 2019; 60 (06) 825-830 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz067.
- 6 Drysch M, Wallner C, Schmidt SV. et al. An optimized low-pressure tourniquet murine hind limb ischemia reperfusion model: Inducing acute ischemia reperfusion injury in C57BL/6 wild type mice. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0210961 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210961.
- 7 Wallner C, Huber J, Drysch M. et al. Myostatin Upregulation in Patients in the Chronic Phase of Severe Burn Injury Leads to Muscle Cell Catabolism. Eur Surg Res 2019; 60 (01/02) 86-96 DOI: 10.1159/000500760.
- 8 Ashraf M, Ebner M, Wallner C. et al. A p38MAPK/MK2 signaling pathway leading to redox stress, cell death and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Cell Commun Signal 2014; 12: 6 DOI: 10.1186/1478–811X-12–6.
- 9 Dadras M, Wallner C, Wagner JM. et al. Negative pressure-induced hyperemia, a new modality in the monitoring of skin paddle containing free flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2019; 72 (12) 1963-1970 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.008.
- 10 Cervenka B, Bewley AF. Free flap monitoring. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 23: 393-8 DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000189.
- 11 Patel UA, Hernandez D, Shnayder Y. et al. Free Flap Reconstruction Monitoring Techniques and Frequency in the Era of Restricted Resident Work Hours. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2017; 143: 803 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0304.
- 12 Um G, Louie O, Said HK. et al. Implantable Cook Doppler versus Synovis Flow Coupler use in perforator-based breast reconstruction for post-operative free flap monitoring: outcomes and reliability. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217: S66 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.141.
- 13 Fox PM, Zeidler K, Carey J. et al. White light spectroscopy for free flap monitoring. Microsurgery 2013; 33: 198-202 DOI: 10.1002/micr.22069.
- 14 Ferguson REH, Yu P. Techniques of Monitoring Buried Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 525-32 DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318196b9a3.
- 15 Rubino C, Farace F, Fara G. et al. Optimizing the Use of Sentinel Skin Paddle in Monitoring Buried Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 62e-63e DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820635a1.
- 16 Bui DT, Cordeiro PG, Hu Q-Y. et al. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 2092-100 DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260598.24376.e1.
- 17 Bigdeli AK, Gazyakan E, Schmidt VJ. et al. Long-Term Outcome after Successful Lower Extremity Free Flap Salvage. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35: 263-9 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038–1675146.
- 18 Panchapakesan V, Addison P, Beausang E. et al. Role of Thrombolysis in Free-Flap Salvage. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19: 523-30 DOI: 10.1055/s-2004–815638.
- 19 Da Silva Freitas R, Tolazzi ARD, Alonso N. et al. Evaluation of molar teeth and buds in patients submitted to mandible distraction: Long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1335-42
- 20 Culliford AT, Spector J, Blank A. et al. The Fate of Lower Extremities With Failed Free Flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 18-22 DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000262740.34106.1b.
- 21 Kolbenschlag J, Ruikis A, Faulhaber L. et al. Elastic Wrapping of Lower Extremity Free Flaps during Dangling Improves Microcirculation and Reduces Pain as well as Edema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35: 522-8 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039–1688451.
- 22 Cerny M, Schantz J-T, Erne H. et al. Überblick und Vorstellung eines Behandlungskonzeptes zur postoperativen Therapie und Mobilisation nach freier Lappenplastik an der unteren Extremität. Handchirurgie · Mikrochirurgie · Plast Chir 2016; 48: 363-9 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042–120275.
- 23 Astanehe A, Temple-Oberle C, Nielsen M. et al. An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Is Safe and Effective. Plast Reconstr Surg – Glob Open 2018; 6: e1634 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001634.
- 24 Lam DL, Mitsumori LM, Neligan PC. et al. Pre-operative CT angiography and three-dimensional image post processing for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructive surgery. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: e1293-7 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/30590223.
- 25 Aubry S, Pauchot J, Kastler A. et al. Preoperative imaging in the planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap surgery. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42: 319-27 DOI: 10.1007/s00256–012–1461-y.
- 26 Sacher M, Kapalschinski RN, Wallner C. et al. Body mass index and abdominal wall thickness correlate with perforator caliber in free abdominal tissue transfer for breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2019; 73 (03) 494-500 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.10.014.
- 27 Nedomansky J, Nickl S, Radtke C. et al. Venous Superdrainage in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141: 206e-212e DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004017.
- 28 Lee K-T, Mun G-H. Benefits of superdrainage using SIEV in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2017; 37: 75-83 DOI: 10.1002/micr.22420.
- 29 Carruthers KH, Tiwari P, Yoshida S. et al. Inpatient Flap Monitoring after Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: How Long Is Long Enough?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35: 682-7 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039–1693454.