Download PDF
Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie 2020; 17(04): 238-240
DOI: 10.1055/a-1202-6568
Aktuell diskutiert

Einsatzgebiet der Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) in der Abklärung von Brustläsionen

Thomas H. Helbich
1   Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinische Abteilung für Allgemeine Radiologie und Kinderradiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien
,
Michael Fuchsjäger
2   Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Graz
,
Martin Daniaux
3   Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
,
Pascal Baltzer
1   Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinische Abteilung für Allgemeine Radiologie und Kinderradiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Corrected by:

Einsatzgebiet der Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) in der Abklärung von BrustläsionenSenologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie 2020; 17(04): e1-e1
DOI: 10.1055/a-1353-1866

Die Richtlinien bezüglich des Einsatzes der MRT der Brust basieren auf Empfehlungen bzw. wissenschaftlichen Erhebungen der EUSOMA und EUSOBI [1] [2] [3] [4] und berücksichtigen darüber hinaus neuere Evidenz, auf die im Einzelnen Bezug genommen wird. Der rasche Wandel der Medizintechnik lässt eine regelmäßige Überarbeitung dieser Richtlinien empfehlen.



Publication History

Article published online:
15 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Mann RM. et al Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information. Eur Radiol 2015; 25 (12) 3669-3678 . doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3807-z
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K. et al Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 2008; 18 (07) 1307-1318 . doi:10.1007/s00330-008-0863-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sardanelli F. et al Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 2010; 46 (08) 1296-1316 . doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Clauser P. et al A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2018; 28 (05) 1909-1918 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5121-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P. et al Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148 (09) 671-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Riedl CC. et al Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 2015; 33 (10) 1128-1135 . doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lindenblatt N, El-Rabadi K, Helbich TH. et al Correlation between MRI results and intraoperative findings in patients with silicone breast implants. Int J Womens Health 2014; 6: 703-709 . doi:10.2147/IJWH.S58493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Houssami N. et al Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 2008; 26 (19) 3248-3258 . doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bennani-Baiti B, Baltzer PA. MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2017; 283 (03) 692-701 . doi:10.1148/radiol.2016161106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bennani-Baiti B, Bennani-Baiti N, Baltzer PA. Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PloS One 2016; 11 (08) e0160346 . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Spick C, Szolar DHM, Preidler KW. et al Breast MRI used as a problem-solving tool reliably excludes malignancy. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84 (01) 61-64 . doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.10.005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Spick C. et al 3 Tesla breast MR imaging as a problem-solving tool: Diagnostic performance and incidental lesions. PloS One 2018; 13 (01) e0190287 . doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG. et al MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 107 (01) 1-14 . doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9528-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Debald M. et al Who may benefit from preoperative breast MRI? A single-center analysis of 1102 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 153 (03) 531-537 . doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3556-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Turnbull L. et al Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 563-571 . doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Peters NHGM. et al Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET – randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990 2011; 47 (06) 879-886 . doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.035
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 van Nijnatten TJA. et al Routine use of standard breast MRI compared to axillary ultrasound for differentiating between no, limited and advanced axillary nodal disease in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85 (12) 2288-2294 . doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Baltzer PAT. et al Application of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective study. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (05) W641-W647 . doi:10.2214/Am J Roentgenol.10.4889
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Schipper RJ. et al Axillary ultrasound for preoperative nodal staging in breast cancer patients: is it of added value?. Breast Edinb Scotl 2013; 22 (06) 1108-1113 . doi:10.1016/j.breast.2013.09.002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pinker K, Helbich TH, Morris EA. The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 2017; 90: 20160715 . doi:10.1259/bjr.20160715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Spick C, Pinker-Domenig K, Rudas M. et al MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies. Eur Radiol 2014; 24 (06) 1204-1210 . doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3153-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pinker K. et al Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the ‘Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System’ for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2013; 23 (07) 1791-1802 . doi:10.1007/s00330-013-2771-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Baltzer A, Dietzel M, Kaiser CG. et al Combined reading of Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging by using a simple sum score. Eur Radiol 2016; 26 (03) 884-891 . doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3886-x
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H. et al Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer. Radiology 2017; 283 (02) 361-370 . doi:10.1148/radiol.2016161444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bakker MF. et al Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue. N Engl J Med 2019; 381 (22) 2091-2102 . doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1903986
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar