Endoscopy 2020; 52(04): 317
DOI: 10.1055/a-1114-2608
Letter to the editor

Reply to Rizzatti et al.

Ruben D. van der Bogt
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Berend J. van der Wilk
2   Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Jan J. B. van Lanschot
2   Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
Manon C. W. Spaander
1   Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations

We would like to thank Dr. Rizzatti and colleagues for their interest in our paper entitled “Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration for the detection of residual nodal disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer” [1].

In their letter to the editor, Dr. Rizzatti and colleagues stress the need for standardization of restaging strategies to improve the detection rate of residual nodal disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The authors suggest a systematic approach in which sampling of an adjacent lymph node (LN) station is only performed in the absence of a positive smear from the previously sampled LN station – comparable to an algorithm that was previously published on initial staging of esophageal cancer [2].

We agree that a change of diagnostic strategy is needed in this clinical setting. After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, residual nodal disease cannot reliably be ruled out based on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features alone, necessitating concomitant fine-needle aspiration (FNA) sampling, preferably in the presence of rapid on-site cytopathological evaluation (ROSE). However, we believe that, even in the presence of ROSE, adequate sampling of LNs will remain challenging owing to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy-induced fibrosis and the focal distribution of vital tumor cells [3]. Indeed, development of a restaging algorithm may be an important step forward. Ideally, such a restaging algorithm should take into account LN distribution based on both patient and disease characteristics, and enable targeting of the LNs that are most likely to be affected. The results of the ongoing TIGER study – a study on the LN distribution in resectable esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy – may serve to develop such tool [4].



Publication History

Article published online:
25 March 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • References

  • 1 van der Bogt RD, van der Wilk BJ, Poley JW. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration for the detection of residual nodal disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Endoscopy 2019; DOI: 10.1055/a-1065-1759.
  • 2 Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE. et al. Impact of lymph node staging on therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 1626-1635
  • 3 Zuccaro Jr. G, Rice TW, Goldblum J. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound cannot determine suitability for esophagectomy after aggressive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 906-912
  • 4 Hagens ERC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Sandick JW. et al. Distribution of lymph node metastases in esophageal carcinoma [TIGER study]: study protocol of a multinational observational study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 662