Stellenwert und qualitative Voraussetzungen der Magnetresonanztomografie für die Therapieplanung beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinom – Interdisziplinäre Empfehlungen

Zusammenfassung

Zur Indikationsstellung und Stratifizierung der perioperativen Therapie des lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinoms ist die Magnetresonanztomografie unverzichtbar. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden der Stellenwert der MRT-Diagnostik und die qualitativen Voraussetzungen dargestellt.

Abstract

For the purpose of indication and patient stratification of perioperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become indispensable. In this report, we describe the importance of MRI diagnostics and the qualitative conditions.

Schlüsselwörter

Rektumkarzinom - Darm - MRT - Neoadjuvante Therapie - Radiochemotherapie

Key words

Rectal cancer - colon - magnetic resonance Imaging - neoadjuvant treatment - radiochemotherapy

• Literatur

• 1 https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/021-007OLl_S3_Kolorektales-Karzinom-KRK_2019-01.pdf ; Zugriff am 3. November 2019
• 2 Fernández-Martos C, Pericay C, Losa F. et al. Effect of Aflibercept Plus Modified FOLFOX6 Induction Chemotherapy Before Standard Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery in Patients With High-Risk Rectal Adenocarcinoma: The GEMCAD 1402 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;
• 3 Marco MR, Zhou L, Patil S. et al. Consolidation mFOLFOX6 Chemotherapy After Chemoradiotherapy Improves Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Final Results of a Multicenter Phase II Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; 61: 1146-1155
• 4 Fokas E, Allgäuer M, Polat B. et al. Randomized Phase II Trial of Chemoradiotherapy Plus Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy as Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: CAO/ARO/AIO-12. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 3212-3222 . doi:10.1200/JCO.19.00308
• 5 Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL. Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 232: 335-346
• 6 Mercury Study Group. Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study. Radiology 2007; 243: 132-139
• 7 Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 2212-2223
• 8 Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ. et al. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis. Radiology 2004; 232: 773-783
• 9 Nougaret S, Reinhold C, Mikhael HW. et al. The use of MR imaging in treatment planning for patients with rectal carcinoma: have you checked the „DISTANCE“?. Radiology 2013; 268: 330-344
• 10 Horvart N, Rocha CCT, Oliveira BC. et al. MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques and Management. Radiographics 2019; 39: 367-387
• 11 Zhang XY, Wang S, Li XT. et al. MRI of Extramural Venous Invasioin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Relationship to Tumor Recurrence and Overall Survival. Radiology 2019; 289: 677-685
• 12 Hoeffel C, Mulé S, Laurent V. et al. Current imaging of rectal cancer. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2015; 39: 168-173
• 13 Slater A, Halligan S, Taylor SA. et al. Distance between the rectal wall and mesorectal fascia measured by MRI: effect of rectal distension and implications for preoperative prediction of a tumour-free circumferential resection margin. Clin Radiol 2016; 61: 65-70
• 14 Ye F, Zhang H, Liang X. et al. Journal club: preoperative MRI evaluation of primary rectal cancer: intrasubject comparison with and without rectal distention. Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207: 32-39