Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2019; 128(05): 221-230
DOI: 10.1055/a-0889-4677
Fortbildung | Digitale Praxis
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Konventionell und digital gut kombiniert – ein klinischer Fallbericht zur einfachen Integration digital gefertigter Totalprothesen in das Praxiskonzept

Sven Rinke
,
Michael Anger
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 May 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die klinischen und zahntechnischen Verfahren zur Versorgung des zahnlosen Kiefers sind seit mehr als 80 Jahren nahezu unverändert geblieben. Die zunehmende Verbreitung digitaler Technologien in der Zahnmedizin hat dazu geführt, dass digitale Fertigungsverfahren zunehmend auch für die Herstellung von Totalprothesen genutzt werden [1].
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Janeva NM, Kovacevska G, Elencevski S. et al. Advantages of CAD/CAM versus Conventional Complete Dentures – A Review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6: 1498-1502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Maeda Y, Minoura M, Tsutsumi S. et al. A CAD/CAM system for the removable denture. Part I: Fabrication of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 17-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. CAD/CAM complete dentures: a review of two commercial fabrication systems. J Calif Dent Assoc 2013; 41: 407-416
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A. An update on computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review on clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117: 478-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A, Goodacre BJ. Clinical complications and quality assessments with computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117: 721-728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bidra AS, Taylor TD, Agar JR. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109: 361-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schweiger J, Stumbaum J, Edelhoff D. et al. Systematics and concepts for the digital production of complete dentures: risks and opportunities. Int J Comput Dent 2018; 21: 41-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 John AV, Abraham G, Alias A. Two-visit CAD/CAM milled dentures in the rehabilitation of edentulous arches: A case series. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2019; 19: 88-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Srinivasan M, Gjengedal H, Cattani-Lorente M. et al. CAD/CAM milled complete removable dental prostheses: An in vitro evaluation of biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness. Dent Mater J 2018; 37: 526-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Steinmassl O, Offermanns V, Stöckl W. et al. In Vitro Analysis of the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Denture Base Resins. Materials (Basel) 2018; 11: pii:E401 doi:10.3390/ma11030401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. et al. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD/CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 107: 34-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Srinivasan M, Cantin Y, Mehl A. et al. CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: an in vitro evaluation of trueness. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 2007-2019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Steinmassl O, Dumfahrt H, Grunert I. et al. CAD/CAM produces dentures with improved fit. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 2829-2835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ. et al. Comparison of denture tooth movement between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 108-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Steinmassl PA, Wiedemair V, Huck C. et al. Do CAD/CAM dentures really release less monomer than conventional dentures?. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 1697-1705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Al-Fouzan AF, Al-Mejrad LA, Albarrag AM. Adherence of Candida to complete denture surfaces in vitro: A comparison of conventional and CAD/CAM complete dentures. J Adv Prosthodont 2017; 9: 402-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kattadiyil MT, Jekki R, Goodacre CJ. et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes in digital and conventional complete removable dental prosthesis fabrications in a predoctoral setting. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114: 818-825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 AlHelal A, AlRumaih HS, Kattadiyil MT. et al. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 117: 233-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Saponaro PC, Yilmaz B, Johnston W. et al. Evaluation of patient experience and satisfaction with CAD-CAM-fabricated complete denture: a retrospective survey study. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 524-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Saponaro PC, Yilmaz B, Heshmati RH. et al. Clinical performance of CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures: a cross-sectional study. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 431-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schwindling FS, Stober T. A comparison of two digital techniques for the fabrication of complete removable dental prostheses: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 756-763
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 AlHelal A, Goodacre BJ, Kattadiyil MT. et al. Errors associated with digital preview of computer-engineered complete dentures and guidelines for reducing them: A technique article. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 119: 17-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Janeva N, Kovacevska G, Janev E. Complete Dentures Fabricated with CAD/CAM Technology and a Traditional Clinical Recording Method. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2017; 5: 785-789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Srinivasan M, Schimmel M, Naharro M. et al. CAD/CAM milled removable complete dentures: time and cost estimation study. J Dent 2019; 80: 75-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar