Download PDF
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2021; 129(02): 99-103
DOI: 10.1055/a-0840-3292
Article

Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography and Ultrasonographic Findings of Achilles Tendon in Patients With and Without Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Özlem Turhan İyidir
1   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Feride Kural Rahatlı
2   Department of Radiology, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Yusuf Bozkuş
1   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Lala Ramazanova
1   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Hale Turnaoğlu
2   Department of Radiology, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Aslı Nar
1   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Neslihan Başçıl Tütüncü
1   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aims We aimed to evaluate the elastographic features of Achilles tendon with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse in patients with and without diabetic neuropathy.

Methods According to the presence of peripheral neuropathy, 45 patients with type 2 diabetes were divided into 2 subgroups. Those with peripheral neuropathy were defined as group I (22 patients) and those without peripheral neuropathy were defined as group II (23 patients). A total of thirty age-, gender-, and body mass index-matched healthy individuals were selected as controls. All participants underwent both ultrasonographic and Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse elastographic examination in order to evaluate Achilles Tendon thickness and stiffness.

Results Achilles tendon thicknesses were similar between groups (p=0.991). Achilles tendon thicknesses of both patient groups were significantly higher than the control group (group I vs control p=0.01; group II vs control p=0.006). Stiffness values of Achilles tendons were similar between the control group and group II (p=0.993). Shear Wave Velocity was significantly lower in group I than group IIand control group (p<0.001).

Conclusion Diabetic patients with neuropathy have thicker and softer Achilles tendon while the elasticity of Achilles tendon in diabetic patients without neuropathy is similar to the healthy controls. Softening of the Achilles tendon may be an early sign of diabetic foot and reveal the patients with a risk of diabetic foot.

Key words

achilles tendon - stiffness - acoustic radiation force impulse elastography - diabetes mellitus


Publication History

Received: 24 August 2018
Received: 19 November 2018

Accepted: 22 January 2019

Article published online:
20 February 2019

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 [Anonymous] . Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 2018; 41: S1-S2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Nawale RB, Mourya VK, Bhise SB. Non-enzymatic glycation of proteins: A cause for complications in diabetes. Indian J Biochem Biophys 2006; 43: 337-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wukich DK. Diabetes and its negative impact on outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. World J Orthop 2015; 6: 331-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Couppe C, Svensson RB, Kongsgaard M. et al. Human Achilles tendon glycation and function in diabetes. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2016; 120: 130-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 American Diabetes A. 10 . Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 2018; 41: S105-S118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ahmed N, Thornalley PJ. Advanced glycation endproducts: What is their relevance to diabetic complications?. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007; 9: 233-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pierre-Jerome C, Moncayo V, Terk MR. MRI of the Achilles tendon: A comprehensive review of the anatomy, biomechanics, and imaging of overuse tendinopathies. Acta Radiol 2010; 51: 438-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rao SR, Saltzman CL, Wilken J. et al. Increased passive ankle stiffness and reduced dorsiflexion range of motion in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 617-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Salsich GB, Mueller MJ, Hastings MK. et al. Effect of Achilles tendon lengthening on ankle muscle performance in people with diabetes mellitus and a neuropathic plantar ulcer. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 34-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Batista F, Nery C, Pinzur M. et al. Achilles tendinopathy in diabetes mellitus. Foot Ankle Int 2008; 29: 498-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Akturk M, Ozdemir A, Maral I. et al. Evaluation of Achilles tendon thickening in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2007; 115: 92-96
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Papanas N, Courcoutsakis N, Papatheodorou K. et al. Achilles tendon volume in type 2 diabetic patients with or without peripheral neuropathy: MRI study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2009; 117: 645-648
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Petrovic M, Maganaris CN, Deschamps K. et al. Altered Achilles tendon function during walking in people with diabetic neuropathy: Implications for metabolic energy saving. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2018; 124: 1333-1340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Evranos B, Idilman I, Ipek A. et al. Real-time sonoelastography and ultrasound evaluation of the Achilles tendon in patients with diabetes with or without foot ulcers: A cross sectional study. J Diabetes Complications 2015; 29: 1124-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Guney A, Vatansever F, Karaman I. et al. Biomechanical properties of Achilles tendon in diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2015; 123: 428-432
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zhan J, Jin JM, Diao XH. et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules – A meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 2181-2186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ruan Z, Zhao B, Qi H. et al. Elasticity of healthy Achilles tendon decreases with the increase of age as determined by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 1043-1050
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wakker J, Kratzer W, Graeter T. et al. Elasticity standard values of the Achilles tendon assessed with acoustic radiation force impulse elastography on healthy volunteers: A cross section study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19: 139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chen XM, Cui LG, He P. et al. Shear wave elastographic characterization of normal and torn achilles tendons: A pilot study. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 449-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Grant WP, Sullivan R, Sonenshine DE. et al. Electron microscopic investigation of the effects of diabetes mellitus on the Achilles tendon. J Foot Ankle Surg 1997; 36: 272-278 discussion 330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Reddy GK. Cross-linking in collagen by nonenzymatic glycation increases the matrix stiffness in rabbit achilles tendon. Exp Diabesity Res 2004; 5: 143-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Boivin GP, Elenes EY, Schultze AK. et al. Biomechanical properties and histology of db/db diabetic mouse Achilles tendon. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2014; 4: 280-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Giacomozzi C, D’Ambrogi E, Uccioli L. et al. Does the thickening of Achilles tendon and plantar fascia contribute to the alteration of diabetic foot loading?. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005; 20: 532-539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 D'Ambrogi E, Giacomozzi C, Macellari V. et al. Abnormal foot function in diabetic patients: The altered onset of Windlass mechanism. Diabet Med 2005; 22: 1713-1719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bolton NR, Smith KE, Pilgram TK. et al. Computed tomography to visualize and quantify the plantar aponeurosis and flexor hallucis longus tendon in the diabetic foot. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005; 20: 540-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar