Download PDF
Homeopathy 2016; 105(03): 280-285
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2016.02.003
Original Paper
Copyright © The Faculty of Homeopathy 2016

Explanatory models for homeopathy: from the vital force to the current paradigm

Silvia Waisse
1   Center Simão Mathias of Studies in History of Science (CESIMA), Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, Rua Caio Prado 102, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
Leoni Villano Bonamin
2   Research Center of Paulista University, Graduation Program of Environmental and Experimental Pathology, Rua Dr Bacelar 1212, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received08 April 2015
revised20 February 2016

accepted29 February 2016

Publication Date:
22 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Facing claims for and against the scientific status of homeopathy, one is entitled to ask: is there a scientific model for homeopathy? In this study we reconstructed the model put forward by Hahnemann. The results showed that it was essentially based on the assumption of a ‘vital force’ exclusive to living beings. While the vital force was a basic element of 18th-century science, the existence of such a sui generis force of nature was refuted with the formulation of the law of the conservation of energy by mid-19th century. As a function of that fact for homeopathic theory, we discuss the history of the rise and demise of the theory of the vital force from the last quarter of the 18th century to 1830. Finally, we call the attention to the paradigm shift biology underwent starting at the end of the 19th century as the framework for contemporary views on the functioning of living beings and consequently, of the effects of pharmacological agents on them.

Keywords

Homeopathy - Explanatory models - Historical review
 

  • References

  • 1 Taylor B.N., Kuyatt C.E. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Technical note 1297. 1994 edn 1994. U.S. Government Printing Office; Washington DC.:
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Waisse S. The science of living matter and the autonomy of life: vitalism, antivitalism and neovitalism in the long German nineteenth century. 2010. LAP; Saarbrücken.:
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Hahnemann. Geist der homöopatischen Heillehre (1833). In: Schmidt JM, Kaiser D (eds). Gesammelte kleine Schriften. Heidelberg: Karl F. Haug Verlag, 2001, pp 842–852. on p. 842.
    PubMed
  • 4 Hahnemann. Geist der homöopatischen Heillehre (1833). In: Schmidt JM, Kaiser D (eds). Gesammelte kleine Schriften. Heidelberg: Karl F. Haug Verlag, 2001, p. 844.
    PubMed
  • 5 Dantas F. How can we get more reliable information from homoeopathic pathogenetic trials? A critique of provings. Br Homeop J 85 1996; 230-236.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hahnemann. Geist der homöopatischen Heillehre (1833). In: Schmidt JM, Kaiser D (eds). Gesammelte kleine Schriften. Heidelberg: Karl F. Haug Verlag, 2001, p. 845. our emphasis.
    PubMed
  • 7 Hahnemann C. Versuch über ein neues Prinzip zur Auffinding der Heikräfte der Arszneisubstanzen (1796). Schmidt J.M., Kaiser D. Gesammelte kleine Schriften. 2001. Karl F. Haug Verlag; Heidelberg: 212-251 on p. 233.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Hahnemann C. Organon der Heilkunst. 6th edn 1995. Museu de Homeopatia Abrahão Brickmann; Ribeirão Preto: §34 et seq.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Hahnemann Geist der homöopatischen Heillehre (1833). Schmidt J.M., Kaiser D. Gesammelte kleine Schriften. 2001. Karl F. Haug Verlag; Heidelberg: 849.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Nugent C. An essay on hydrophobia…. 1753. James Leake & Eilliam Frederic; London: 173.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Hunter J. A treatise on the venereal disease. 2nd edn 1788. (s.e.); London: pp. 12; 7.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Hahnemann Geist der homöopatischen Heillehre (1833). Schmidt J.M., Kaiser D. Gesammelte kleine Schriften. 2001. Karl F. Haug Verlag; Heidelberg: 851-852.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Waisse The science of living matter and the autonomy of life: vitalism, antivitalism and neovitalism in the long German nineteenth century. 2010. LAP; Saarbrücken: 65.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Levere T.H. Affinity and matter: elements of chemical philosophy, 1800–1865. 1971. Clarendon Press; London.:
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Newton I. Opticks. 1730. Printed for W. Innys; London: pp. 350, emphasis is ours.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Hahnemann Organon der Heilkunst. 6th edn 1995. Museu de Homeopatia Abrahão Brickmann; Ribeirão Preto: §11, note.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Hahnemann C. Ueber der Werth der speculativen Arzneysysteme, besonders im Gegenhalt der mit ihnen gepaarten, gewöhnlichen Praxis (1808). Schmidt J.M., Kaiser D. Gesammelte kleine Schriften. 2001. Karl F. Haug Verlag; Heidelberg: 502-514 on pp. 505.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Roe S.A. Matter, life and generation: 18th-century embryology and the Haller-Wolff debate. 1981. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 99-102.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Haller Av. Untersuchung der reizbaren Theile im menschlichen Körper. Der Königl. Schwedischen Akademie der Wissenschaften neue Abhandlungen aus der Naturlehre. Haushaltungskunst und Mechanik; 15 (1756): 96–127, p 121–122.
    PubMed
  • 20 Haller Av. Untersuchung der reizbaren Theile im menschlichen Körper. Der Königl. Schwedischen Akademie der Wissenschaften neue Abhandlungen aus der Naturlehre. Haushaltungskunst und Mechanik; 15 (1756): 96–127, p. 123.
    PubMed
  • 21 Hall T.S. Ideas of life and matter: studies in the history of general physiology 600 BC-1900 AD. The University of Chicago Press; Chicago: 1969. Vol 2 67-85.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Blumenbach J.F. The elements of physiology. 4th edn 1828. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green; London: 1-2.
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Blumenbach J.F. Über den Bildungstrieb. 1789. Johann Christian Dieterich; Göttingen: 25.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 du Bois-Reymond E., Gedachtnisrefe auf Joh Müller. Abhandlungen der königlichen Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1859. 1860. Druckerei der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften; Berlin: 25-191.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Müller J. Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen. Vol 1, part 1 1837. J. Hölscher; Coblenz.:
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Liebig J .v. Nouvelles lettres sur la chemie. 1852. Charpentier; Paris: 52-53.
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Kuhn T.S. Energy conservation as an example of simultaneous discovery. Clagett M. Critical Problems in the History of Science. 1959. University of Wisconsin Press; Madison: 321-356.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Bevilacqua F. Helmholtz Über die Erhaltung der Kraft: the emergence of a theoretical physicist. Cahan D. Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-century Science. 1993. University of California Press; Berkeley: 291-333.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Bevilacqua F. Conservation and innovation: Helmholtz struggle with energy problems (1845–1895) and the birth of theoretical physics. http://ppp.unipv.it/silsis/Pagine/Corso1/ [access on January 2006].
    PubMed
  • 30 Gradmann C. Hermann von Helmholtz: historiography and biography 100 years later. Hist Phil Life Sci 19 1997; 263-271.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gradmann C. Hermann von Helmholtz als Mediziner und Physiologe. Klages H., Löbbig H. Hermann von Helmholtz; Klassiker an der Epochwende. 1997. Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum; Braunschweig: 127-151.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Tuchman A. Helmholtz and the German medical community. Cahan D. Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-century Science. 1993. University of California Press; Berkeley: 17-49.
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Olesko K.M., Holmes F.L. Experiment, quantification and discovery: Helmholtz’s early physiological researches. Cahan D. Hermann von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Nineteenth-century Science. 1993. University of California Press; Berkeley: 50-108.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Mayr E. The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance (1982). 2000. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; Cambridge [MA]: 52.
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Canguilhem G. Le normal et le pathologique (1966). 12th edn 2013. PUF; Paris.:
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Hogeweg P. The roots of bioinformatics in theoretical biology. Plos Comput Biol 7 (03) 2011; e1002021 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002021.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bonamin L.V., Waisse S. Biology and sign theory: homeopathy emerging as biosemiotics. J Med Pers 13 2015; 18-22 10.1007/s12682-014-0191-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Mandal A. What is molecular biology? News medical http://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-Molecular-Biology.aspx [access on Feb 15 2015]; emphasis is ours.
    PubMed
  • 39 Bellavite P., Signorini A., Marzotto M., Moratti E., Bonafini C., Olioso D. Cell sensitivity, non-linearity and inverse effects. Homeopathy 104 (02) 2015; 139-160.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Endler P.C., Schulte J., Stock-Schröer S. Special Issue: Ultra High Dilution Revisited After 21 Years. Homeopathy. 104(4) 2005; 221-344.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar