Interim results of a randomised controlled trial of homeopathic treatment for irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic condition for which there is no consensus on the optimum treatment. Gastroenterology problems are some of the most common conditions treated by homeopaths, yet few trials have explored the effectiveness of individualised homeopathic treatment for IBS. A three-armed trial was conducted which compared: usual care, homeopathic treatment plus usual care and supportive listening plus usual care. The primary outcome was change in irritable bowel symptom severity score between baseline and 26 weeks, calculated using ANCOVA. An interim ANCOVA adjusted for baseline IBS severity, age and employment status found no statistically significant difference between the three arms. However, a post-hoc test comparing homeopathic treatment plus usual care to usual care alone found a statistically significant difference in favour of homeopathic treatment. In addition, 62.5 percent of patients in the homeopathic treatment arm (compared to 25.0 percent of those in the usual care arm), achieved a clinically relevant change in irritable bowel symptom severity score, which indicates a promising effect for homeopathic treatment, though these results should be interpreted with caution due to the low number of participants in the study.

Keywords

Irritable bowel syndrome - Homeopathy - Randomised controlled trial - Attention control

• References

• 1 Spiller R., Aziz Q., Creed F. et al Guidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and practical management. Gut 2007; 56: 1770-1798.
• 2 Ehlin A.G.C., Montgomery S.M., Ekbom A. et al Prevalence of gastrointestinal diseases in two British national birth cohorts. Gut 2003; 52: 1117-1121.
• 3 Akehurst R.L., Brazier J.E., Mathers N. et al Health-related quality of life and cost impact of irritable bowel syndrome in a UK primary care setting. Pharmacoeconomics 2002; 20: 455-462.
• 4 Drossman D.A., Whitehead W.E., Camilleri M. Irritable bowel syndrome: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 2120-2137.
• 5 Ernst E. Homeopathy, a “helpful placebo” or an unethical intervention?. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2010; 31: 1.
• 6 Spence D.S., Thompson E.A. Homeopathic treatment for chronic disease: a 6-year, University-Hospital outpatient observational study. J Altern Complement Med 2005; 11: 793-798.
• 7 Mathie R.T., Robinson T.W. Outcomes from homeopathic prescribing in medical practice: a prospective, research-targeted, pilot study. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 199-205.
• 8 Relton C., Torgerson D., O'Cathain A. et al Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design. BMJ 2010; 340: c1066.
• 9 Peckham E., Relton C., Raw J., Walters C., Thomas K., Smith C. A protocol for a trial of homeopathic treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Complement Altern Med 2012; 12.
• 10 Francis C.Y., Morris J., Whorwell P.J. The irritable bowel severity scoring system: a simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progress. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997; 11: 395-402.
• 11 Zigmond A.S., Snaith R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-370.
• 12 Mercer S.W., Maxwell M., Heaney D. et al The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract 2004; 21: 699-705.
• 13 Borkovec T.D., Nau S.D. Credibility of analogue therapy rationales. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1972; 3: 257-260.
• 14 Drossman D.A., Toner B.B., Whitehead W.E. et al Cognitive-behavioral therapy versus education and desipramine versus placebo for moderate to severe functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 19-31.
• 15 Hillila M.T., Farkkila N.J., Farkkila M.A. Societal costs for irritable bowel syndrome – a population based study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 582-591.
• 16 Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995; 310: 170.