2nd joint European NOTES Workshop

Abstracts (HTML) List of Authors

Bakos, G. J.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study

Bally, K. R.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study

Bemelman, W. A.

Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal endoscopic ultrasonography

Bergström, M.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study

Caca, K.

Endoscopic closure of the NOTES access site to the peritoneal cavity by means of transmural resorbable sutures: an animal survival study

Cacai, K.

Effectivity of current sterility methods for transgastric access NOTES procedures: results of a randomized porcine study

Cohen, A.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model

Conlon, S.

Transgastric Peritoneoscopy versus Laparoscopy for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases

Cunningham, C.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study

Delius, S. von

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.
The „ELITE“: Construct validation of a new training system for NOTES

Dolz, C.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Eickhoff, A.

Endoscopic closure of the NOTES access site to the peritoneal cavity by means of transmural resorbable sutures: an animal survival study
Effectivity of current sterility methods for transgastric access NOTES procedures: results of a randomized porcine study

Espinos, J.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE),

2nd joint European NOTES Workshop

Faigel, D.

Transgastric Peritoneoscopy versus Laparoscopy for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases

Fernandez-Esparrach, G.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model

Fernández-Esparrach, G.

A new multi-tasking platform for advanced intraluminal and NOTES procedures: learning curve assessment and accuracy in an endoscopic mucosal resection model

Ferrigno, M.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model

Feussner, H.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.
The „ELITE“: Construct validation of a new training system for NOTES

Fiolka, A.

The „ELITE“: Construct validation of a new training system for NOTES

Fockens, P.

Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal endoscopic ultrasonography
Transgastric Peritoneoscopy versus Laparoscopy for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases

Friess, H.

The „ELITE“: Construct validation of a new training system for NOTES

Gillen, S.

The „ELITE“: Construct validation of a new training system for NOTES

Gonzalez-Carro, P.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Gonzalez-Huix, F.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Goyeneche, M.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Huber, W.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.

Hungness, E. S.

A new multi-tasking platform for advanced intraluminal and NOTES procedures: learning curve assessment and accuracy in an endoscopic mucosal resection model

Igea, F.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Juzgado, D.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Kaehler, G.

Endoscopic closure of the NOTES access site to the peritoneal cavity by means of transmural resorbable sutures: an animal survival study

Kählen, G.

Effectivity of current sterility methods for transgastric access NOTES procedures: results of a randomized porcine study

Long, G. L.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study

Meining, A.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.
The „ELITE“: Construct validation of a new training system for NOTES

Park, P.-O.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study

Perez-Duarte, F.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Perez-Miranda, M.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Rattner, D. W.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model

Renteln, D. von

Endoscopic closure of the NOTES access site to the peritoneal cavity by means of transmural resorbable sutures: an animal survival study
Effectivity of current sterility methods for transgastric access NOTES procedures: results of a randomized porcine study

Riemann, J. F.

Effectivity of current sterility methods for transgastric access NOTES procedures: results of a randomized porcine study

Rothstein, R. I.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study
A new multi-tasking platform for advanced intraluminal and NOTES procedures: learning curve assessment and accuracy in an endoscopic mucosal resection model

Rowe, R.

Transgastric Peritoneoscopy versus Laparoscopy for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases

Ryan, M.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model

Ryou, M.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model

Sager, J.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.

Schmid, R. M.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.

Schneider, A.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.
The „ELITE“: Construct validation of a new training system for NOTES

Schuster, T.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.

Shaikh, S. N.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model
A new multi-tasking platform for advanced intraluminal and NOTES procedures: learning curve assessment and accuracy in an endoscopic mucosal resection model

Sheppard, B.

Transgastric Peritoneoscopy versus Laparoscopy for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases

Soper, N. J.

A new multi-tasking platform for advanced intraluminal and NOTES procedures: learning curve assessment and accuracy in an endoscopic mucosal resection model

Spivey, J.

Transgastric Peritoneoscopy versus Laparoscopy for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases

Swain, P.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study

Swanstrom, L. L.

A new multi-tasking platform for advanced intraluminal and NOTES procedures: learning curve assessment and accuracy in an endoscopic mucosal resection model

Sylla, P.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model

Thies, P.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.

Thompson, C. C.

NOTES abdominal exploration: a prospective comparative study of laparoscopy, transgastric NOTES and transcolonic NOTES in a porcine model
A new multi-tasking platform for advanced intraluminal and NOTES procedures: learning curve assessment and accuracy in an endoscopic mucosal resection model

Vakharia, O. J.

Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized study

Van Berge Henegouwen, M.

Transgastric Peritoneoscopy versus Laparoscopy for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases

Van Berge Henegouwen, M. I.

Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal endoscopic ultrasonography

Vazquez-Sequeiros, E.

Relative performance of four second generation flexible endoscopic notes closure techniques (FECT's)

Vetter, S.

Effectivity of current sterility methods for transgastric access NOTES procedures: results of a randomized porcine study

Voermans, R. P.

Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal endoscopic ultrasonography
Transgastric Peritoneoscopy versus Laparoscopy for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases

Wilhelm, D.

Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison to laparoscopic capnoperitoneum.