Degree of satisfaction among hearing aid users

Summary

Introduction: Hearing loss (HL) is defined as the complete or partial loss of hearing ability.

Aims: To characterize (1) the degree of satisfaction among adult and elderly hearing aid (HA) users who were treated by a public hearing health service and (2) the relationship between satisfaction and the variables of gender, age, degree of HL, and type of HA.

Method: The clinical and experimental study included the administration of the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire to 110 patients who had used HAs for more than 3 months and were 18 years of age or older.

Results: Test patients were sex-balanced (48% were women) and had a mean age of 67 years. A relatively high incidence of sensorineural moderate HL was detected in the study patients (66%) and device B was the most commonly used HA type (48%). No significant differences were evident between HA satisfaction and sex. The importance placed on services/costs and personal image varied between age groups. Correlation was evident at all levels between user satisfaction and amplification. Decreased satisfaction was observed in individuals with severe and/or profound HL. The type of HA used yielded statistically significant differences in the positive effects referring.

Conclusion: No correlations were evident between the different factors proposed. HA users exhibited high levels of satisfaction in all SADL areas.

Keywords

hearing loss - hearing aids - patient satisfaction

• References

• 1 World Health Organization - WHO/OMS. [texto na internet]. 2009. [acesso em 05 de julho de 2010]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/en/
• 2 Andrade CF, Blasca WQ. A satisfação do usuário de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual com a tecnologia digital. Salusvita 2005; 24 (2) 257-65
• 3 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n° 432, de 14 de novembro de 2000. Institui a política nacional de atenção à saúde auditiva Disponível em: < http://dtr2001.saude.gov.br/sas/PORTARIAS/PORT2000/PT-432.htm >.
• 4 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria n° 2.073/GM de 28, de setembro de 2004. Institui a política nacional de atenção à saúde auditiva. Disponível em: Carvalho SA< http://dtr2001.saude.gov.br/sas/PORTARIAS/PORT2004/GM/GM-2073.htm >.
• 5 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Distribuição da rede estadual para ações na atenção básica, na média e alta complexidade, portaria SAS/MS n.° 587 de 07/10/2004. www.saude.gov.br . 2005.
• 6 Campos CAH, Russo ICP, Almeida K. Indicação, seleção e adaptação de próteses auditivas: princípios gerais. In: Almeida K, Iório MCM. Próteses auditivas fundamentos teóricos e aplicações clinicas. Lovise; 2003
• 7 Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999; 20 (4) 306-20
• 8 Hosford-Dunn H, Halpern J. Clinical application of the satisfaction with amplification in daily life scale in private practice I: statistical, content, and factorial validity. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (10) 523-39
• 9 Veiga LR, Merlo ARC, Mengue SS. Satisfação com a prótese auditiva na vida diária em usuários do Sistema de Saúde do Exército. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2005; 71 (1) 67-73
• 10 Cox RM, Alexander GC. Expectations about hearing aids and their relationship to fitting outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11 (7) 368-82
• 11 Almeida K, Taguchi CK. Utilização do questionário na auto-avaliação do benefício das próteses auditivas. Pró-Fono 2004; 16 (1) 101-10
• 12 Assayag FHM, Russo ICP. Avaliação subjetiva do benefício e dos efeitos proporcionados pelo uso de amplificação sonora em indivíduos idosos. Rev Dist Comum 2006; 18 (3) 383-90
• 13 WHO – World Health Organization. Grades of Hearing impairment, 2007 [acesso em 26 de fevereiro de 2010]. Disponível em : http://www.who.int/pbd/desfness/hearing_impairment_grades/en/index.html
• 14 Soares DO, Tavares RA, Ferreira RT, Guglielmino G, Dinato C, Franchi VM. Satisfação dos usuários de prótese auditiva em seu dia-a-dia. ACTA ORL 2007; 25 (4) 290-92
• 15 Pinzan-Faria VM, Iorio MCM. Sensibilidade auditiva e autopercepção do handicap: um estudo em idosos. Distúrbios da Comunicação, São Paulo 2004; 16 (3) 289-99
• 16 Lessa AH, Costa MJ, Becker KT, Vaucher VA. Satisfação de Usuários de Próteses Auditivas, com Perda Auditiva de Graus Severo e Profundo. Arq Int Otorrinolaringol 2010; 14 (3) 338-45
• 17 Farias RB, Russo ICP. Saúde auditiva: estudo do grau de satisfação de usuários de aparelho de amplificação sonora individual. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2010; 15 (1 ) 26-31
• 18 Mcleod B, Upfold L, Broadbent C. An investigation of the applicability of the inventory, satisfaction with amplification in daily life, at 2 weeks post hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear 2001; 22 (4) 3427
• 19 Kam ACS. Hearing-aid outcomes in Chinese adults: Clinical application and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire. Int J of Audiol 2012; 51: 450-5
• 20 Meister H, Grugel L, Meis M, Kiessling J. Use of self-assessment inventories in hearing-aid provision: German versions of ECHO and SADL. Int J of Audiol 2012; 51: 135-42