Open Access
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 16(04): 497-501
DOI: 10.7162/S1809-97772012000400011
Original Article
Thieme Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Electronic data collection for the analysis of surgical maneuvers on patients submitted to rhinoplasty

Cezar Berger
1   Master. Volunteer Teacher in the ENT Department of HC-UFPR and Doctor and Medical Advisor for the Fellowship Program at IPO.
,
Renato Freitas
2   Associate Professor and Head of the Plastic Surgery Service of the Federal University of Parana. Associate Professor and Head of the Plastic Surgery Service of the Federal University of Parana.
,
Osvaldo Malafaia
3   Doctor. Professor of Surgery at UFPR, Coordinator of the Graduate Program in the Principles of Surgery of the HUEC, and Professor at the Evangelical School of Paraná.
,
José Simão de Paula Pinto
4   Doctor. Adjunct Professor at the Federal University of Parana and Coordinator of the Master of Science, Management and Information Technology.
,
Marcos Mocellin
5   Doctor. Head of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, HC-UFPR.
,
Evaldo Macedo
6   Doctor. Coordinator of the NEP IPO and Professor at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, HC-UFPR.
,
Marina Serrato Coelho Fagundes
7   Graduate Student. ENT doctor.
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

01. Februar 2012

26. August 2012

Publikationsdatum:
10. Dezember 2013 (online)

Preview

Summary

Introduction: In the health field, computerization has become increasingly necessary in professional practice, since it facilitates data recovery and assists in the development of research with greater scientific rigor.

Objective: the present work aimed to develop, apply, and validate specific electronic protocols for patients referred for rhinoplasty.

Methods: The prospective research had 3 stages: (1) preparation of theoretical data bases; (2) creation of a master protocol using Integrated System of Electronic Protocol (SINPE©); and (3) elaboration, application, and validation of a specific protocol for the nose and sinuses regarding rhinoplasty.

Results: After the preparation of the master protocol, which dealt with the entire field of otorhinolaryngology, we idealized a specific protocol containing all matters related to the patient. In particular, the aesthetic and functional nasal complaints referred for surgical treatment (i.e., rhinoplasty) were organized into 6 main hierarchical categories: anamnesis, physical examination, complementary exams, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. This protocol utilized these categories and their sub-items: finality; access; surgical maneuvers on the nasal dorsum, tip, and base; clinical evolution after 3, 6, and 12 months; revisional surgery; and quantitative and qualitative evaluations.

Conclusion: The developed electronic-specific protocol is feasible and important for information registration from patients referred to rhinoplasty.