Autologous Fat Graft in the Reconstructed Breast: Fat Absorption Rate and Safety based on Sonographic Identification

Hong Youl Kim; Bok Ki Jung; Dae Hyun Lew; Dong Won Lee

doi:10.5999/aps.2014.41.6.740

Archives of Plastic Surgery, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41(06): 740-747
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.6.740

Original Article

Autologous Fat Graft in the Reconstructed Breast: Fat Absorption Rate and Safety based on Sonographic Identification

Hong Youl Kim

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

,

Bok Ki Jung

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

,

Dae Hyun Lew

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

,

Dong Won Lee

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Autologous fat graft has become a useful technique for correction of acquired contour deformity in reconstructed breasts. However, there remains controversial regarding the efficacy and safety of the practice for reconstructive breast surgery.

Methods A retrospective review was performed on 102 patients who had secondary fat grafting after breast reconstruction. Fat harvest, refinement and injection were done by Coleman's technique. All patients were followed up postoperatively within 1 month and after 6 months including physical examination and ultrasonography. In 38 patients, the reabsorption rate was calculated by serial changes of thickness between skin and pectoral fascia in the ultrasonic finding. Locoregional recurrence rate was compared with control group of 449 patients who had breast reconstruction without fat graft in the same time period.

Results Average 49.3 mL fat was injected into each breast. The most common location of fat graft was upper pole, followed by axilla, lower and medial breasts. During 28.7 months of average follow-up period, 2.9% of total patients had symptoms of palpable mass on fat graft side and ultrasonography identified fat necrosis and cyst formation in 17.6% of the patients. Calculated fat reabsorption rate was 32.9%. Locoregional recurrence was occurred in 1 patient (0.9%) and the rate was not different significantly with control group (2%).

Conclusions Although further studies are required to provide surgeons with definitive guidelines for the implementation of fat grafting, we propose autologous fat graft is an efficient and safe technique for secondary breast reconstruction.

Keywords

Breast - Fat necrosis - Ultrasonography

Full Text

References

References
1 Losken A, Pinell XA, Sikoro K. et al. Autologous fat grafting in secondary breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66: 518-522
2 Report on autologous fat transplantation. ASPRS Ad-Hoc Committee on New Procedures, September 30, 1987. Plast Surg Nurs 1987; 7: 140-141
3 Spear SL, Wilson HB, Lockwood MD. Fat injection to correct contour deformities in the reconstructed breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 1300-1305
4 Missana MC, Laurent I, Barreau L. et al. Autologous fat transfer in reconstructive breast surgery: indications, technique and results. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33: 685-690
5 Gutowski KA. ASPS Fat Graft Task Force. Current applications and safety of autologous fat grafts: a report of the ASPS fat graft task force. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 272-280
6 Pearl RA, Leedham SJ, Pacifico MD. The safety of autologous fat transfer in breast cancer: lessons from stem cell biology. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: 283-288
7 Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP. Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 775-785
8 Toledo LS. Syringe liposculpture. Clin Plast Surg 1996; 23: 683-693
9 Delay E. Lipomodeling of the reconstructed breast. In: Spear SL. Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 912-933
10 Horl HW, Feller AM, Biemer E. Technique for liposuction fat reimplantation and long-term volume evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 1991; 26: 248-258
11 Fisher C, Grahovac TL, Schafer ME. et al. Comparison of harvest and processing techniques for fat grafting and adipose stem cell isolation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 351-361
12 Ferguson RE, Cui X, Fink BF. et al. The viability of autologous fat grafts harvested with the LipiVage system: a comparative study. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60: 594-597
13 Pierrefeu-Lagrange AC, Delay E, Guerin N. et al. Radiological evaluation of breasts reconstructed with lipomodeling. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2006; 51: 18-28
14 Rigotti G, Marchi A, Galie M. et al. Clinical treatment of radiotherapy tissue damage by lipoaspirate transplant: a healing process mediated by adipose-derived adult stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 1409-1422
15 Ando S, Catalano S. The multifactorial role of leptin in driving the breast cancer microenvironment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011; 8: 263-275
16 Choi M, Small K, Levovitz C. et al. The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 185-191