A New Approach to Objective Evaluation of the Success of Nasal Septum Perforation

Background Perforations in the nasal septum (NSP) give rise not only to disintegration of the septum anatomy but also impairment in normal nasal physiology. The successes of these surgical techniques are usually equated to anatomical closure of the perforation. The goal of this study is to evaluate the subjective and objective results of our surgical technique for septal perforation surgery.

Methods All NSPs in the six patients were closed by inferior turbinate flap. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) instrument was used to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative subjective sensation of nasal obstruction. Measurement of preoperative and postoperative nasal airway resistance was performed using active anterior rhinomanometry which is an objective test. Wilcoxson signed rank test and Spearman correlation test were used to analyze correlation between NOSE scores and rhinomanometric measurements.

Results The full closure of the septal perforations was noted in 100% of patients. The total NOSE score was 14 preoperatively and one postoperatively. The improvement in NOSE scores was statistically significant (P≤0.002). The mean preoperative total resistance (ResT150) value was 0.13 Pa/cm³s^-1, which is below the normal range (0.16-0.31 Pa/cm³s^-1), while the mean postoperative ResT150 value was 0.27 Pa/cm³s^-1. The correlation between the improvement in NOSE scores and improvements in ResT150 values was statistically significant.

Conclusions Surgical approaches should aim to solve both the anatomical and physiological problems of NSP. The application of subjective and objective tests in the postoperative period will help surgeons assess the applied techniques.

Keywords

Nasal - Perforation - Rhinomanometry - Surgery

This article was accepted (not presented) as oral session at the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) Annual Meeting May 6-11, 2011 on Boston (couldnt be presented for the technical reasons).

Publication History

Received: 28 April 2014

Accepted: 07 July 2014

Article published online:
05 May 2022

• References

• 1 Kridel RW. Considerations in the etiology, treatment, and repair of septal perforations. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2004; 12: 435-450
• 2 Leong SC, Chen XB, Lee HP. et al. A review of the implications of computational fluid dynamic studies on nasal airflow and physiology. Rhinology 2010; 48: 139-145
• 3 Pallanch JF, Facer GW, Kern EB. et al. Prosthetic closure of nasal septal perforations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1982; 90: 448-452
• 4 Kridel RW. Septal perforation repair. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999; 32: 695-724
• 5 Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM. et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 283-290
• 6 Clement PA. Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rhinology 1984; 22: 151-155
• 7 Broms P, Jonson B, Malm L. Rhinomanometry. IV. A pre- and postoperative evaluation in functional septoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 1982; 94: 523-529
• 8 Clement PA, Gordts F. Standardisation Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airway, IRS, and ERS. Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 2005; 43: 169-179
• 9 Park JH, Kim D, Jin HR. Nasal septal perforation repair using intranasal rotation and advancement flaps. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013; 27: e42-e47
• 10 Friedman M, Ibrahim H, Ramakrishnan V. Inferior turbinate flap for repair of nasal septal perforation. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1425-1428
• 11 Kridel RW, Appling WD, Wright WK. Septal perforation closure utilizing the external septorhinoplasty approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986; 112: 168-172
• 12 Kridel RW, Foda H, Lunde KC. Septal perforation repair with acellular human dermal allograft. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 124: 73-78
• 13 Woolford TJ, Jones NS. Repair of nasal septal perforations using local mucosal flaps and a composite cartilage graft. J Laryngol Otol 2001; 115: 22-25
• 14 Pless D, Keck T, Wiesmiller KM. et al. Numerical simulation of airflow patterns and air temperature distribution during inspiration in a nose model with septal perforation. Am J Rhinol 2004; 18: 357-362
• 15 Lindemann J, Leiacker R, Stehmer V. et al. Intranasal temperature and humidity profile in patients with nasal septal perforation before and after surgical closure. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001; 26: 433-437
• 16 Grant O, Bailie N, Watterson J. et al. Numerical model of a nasal septal perforation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107: 1352-1356
• 17 Lee HP, Garlapati RR, Chong VF. et al. Effects of septal perforation on nasal airflow: computer simulation study. J Laryngol Otol 2010; 124: 48-54
• 18 Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL. et al. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 157-163
• 19 Mlynski G, Grutzenmacher S, Plontke S. et al. Correlation of nasal morphology and respiratory function. Rhinology 2001; 39: 197-201
• 20 Grutzenmacher S, Mlynski R, Lang C. et al. The nasal airflow in noses with septal perforation: a model study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2005; 67: 142-147
• 21 Sipila J, Suonpaa J. A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997; 254: 387-390