Download PDF
CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41(03): 264-270
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.3.264
Original Article

Delayed versus Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Blinded Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcomes

Frank P Albino
Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
,
Ketan M Patel
Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
,
Jesse R Smith
Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
,
Maurice Y Nahabedian
Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Background The technique of delayed-immediate breast reconstruction includes immediate insertion of a tissue expander, post-mastectomy radiation, followed by reconstruction. The aesthetic benefits of delayed-immediate reconstruction compared to delayed reconstruction are postulated but remain unproven. The purpose of this study was to compare aesthetic outcomes in patients following delayed and delayed-immediate autologous breast reconstruction.

Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients who underwent delayed or delayed-immediate autologous breast reconstruction by the senior author from 2005 to 2011. Postoperative photographs were used to evaluate aesthetic outcomes: skin quality, scar formation, superior pole contour, inferior pole contour, and overall aesthetic outcome. Ten non-biased reviewers assessed outcomes using a 5-point Likert scale. Fisher's Exact and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparative analysis.

Results Patient age and body mass index were similar between delayed (n=20) and delayed-immediate (n=20) cohorts (P>0.05). Skin and scar quality was rated significantly higher in the delayed-immediate cohort (3.74 vs. 3.05, P<0.001 and 3.41 vs. 2.79, P<0.001; respectively). Assessment of contour-related parameters, superior pole and inferior pole, found significantly improved outcomes in the delayed-immediate cohort (3.67 vs. 2.96, P<0.001 and 3.84 vs. 3.06, P<0.001; respectively). Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction had a significantly higher overall score compared to delayed breast reconstructions (3.84 vs. 2.94, P<0.001). Smoking and the time interval from radiation to reconstruction were found to affect aesthetic outcomes (P<0.05).

Conclusions Preservation of native mastectomy skin may allow for improved skin/scar quality, breast contour, and overall aesthetic outcomes following a delayed-immediate reconstructive algorithm as compared to delayed breast reconstruction.

Keywords

Mammaplasty - Breast implantation - Cosmetic techniques - Mastectomy

This article was presented at the Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons on September 20-22, 2013 in Washington, DC, USA.


No funding was utilized for the preparation of this manuscript. Dr. Nahabedian is a member of the Speakers Bureau for LifeCell Corporation (Branchburg, New Jersey). No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.




Publication History

Received: 27 January 2014

Accepted: 06 March 2014

Article published online:
02 May 2022

© 2014. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J. et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-1241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N. et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 441-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kronowitz SJ. Current status of autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 282-292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Albino FP, Koltz PF, Ling MN. et al. Irradiated autologous breast reconstructions: effects of patient factors and treatment variables. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 12-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jhaveri JD, Rush SC, Kostroff K. et al. Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 72: 859-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wong JS, Ho AY, Kaelin CM. et al. Incidence of major corrective surgery after post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Breast J 2008; 14: 49-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kronowitz SJ. Current status of implant-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 513e-523e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Chang DW, Barnea Y, Robb GL. Effects of an autologous flap combined with an implant for breast reconstruction: an evaluation of 1000 consecutive reconstructions of previously irradiated breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 356-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Crisera CA, Chang EI, Da Lio AL. et al. Immediate free flap reconstruction for advanced-stage breast cancer: is it safe?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 32-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 395-408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tran NV, Evans GR, Kroll SS. et al. Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 313-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kronowitz SJ, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM. et al. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1617-1628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kronowitz SJ, Lam C, Terefe W. et al. A multidisciplinary protocol for planned skin-preserving delayed breast reconstruction for patients with locally advanced breast cancer requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy: 3-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 2154-2166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hvilsom GB, Holmich LR, Steding-Jessen M. et al. Delayed breast implant reconstruction: is radiation therapy associated with capsular contracture or reoperations?. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68: 246-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Whitfield GA, Horan G, Irwin MS. et al. Incidence of severe capsular contracture following implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with or without postoperative chest wall radiotherapy using 40 Gray in 15 fractions. Radiother Oncol 2009; 90: 141-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Momoh AO, Colakoglu S, de Blacam C. et al. Delayed autologous breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy: is there an optimal time?. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69: 14-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N. et al. Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 2010; 17 (Suppl 3) 202-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Roostaeian J, Pavone L, Da Lio A. et al. Immediate placement of implants in breast reconstruction: patient selection and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 1407-1416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Baumann DP, Crosby MA, Selber JC. et al. Optimal timing of delayed free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 1100-1106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL. et al. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 1086-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Dumanian GA. et al. Outcomes of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in the setting of prereconstruction radiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 354-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar