The Effects of Topical Agent (Kelo-Cote or Contractubex) Massage on the Thickness of Post-Burn Scar Tissue Formed in Rats

Background We conducted an experimental study to compare the effect of massage using topical agents (Kelo-cote or Contractubex) on scar formation by massaging the healed burn wound on the dorsal area of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats.

Methods Four areas of second degree contact burn were made on the dorsal area of each of 15 SD rats, using a soldering iron 15 mm in diameter. After gross epithelialization in the defect, 15 SD rats were randomly divided into four groups: the Kelo-cote group, Contractubex group, Vaseline group, and control group. Rats in three of the groups (all but the Control group) were massaged twice per day for 5 minutes each day, while those in the Control group were left unattended. For histologic analysis, we performed a biopsy and evaluated the thickness of scar tissue.

Results In the Kelo-cote and Contractubex groups, scar tissue thicknesses showed a significant decrease, compared with the Vaseline and control groups. However, no significant differences were observed between the Kelo-cote and Contractubex groups. In the Vaseline group, scar tissue thicknesses showed a significant decrease, compared with the control groups.

Conclusions The findings of this study suggest that massage using a topical agent is helpful in the prevention of scar formation and that massage only with lubricant (no use of a topical agent) also has a considerable effect, although not as much as the use of a topical agent. Thus, we recommend massage with a topical agent on the post-burn scar as an effective method for decreasing the scar thickness.

Keywords

Burns - Cicatrix, hypertrophic - Wound healing - Massage

This article was supported by Wonkwang University in 2012.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 05. Juli 2013

Angenommen: 02. August 2013

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Mai 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Broughton 2nd G, Janis JE, Attinger CE. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 12S-34S
• 2 Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 738-746
• 3 Desmouliere A, Redard M, Darby I. et al. Apoptosis mediates the decrease in cellularity during the transition between granulation tissue and scar. Am J Pathol 1995; 146: 56-66
• 4 Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y. et al. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 2008; 453: 314-321
• 5 Alster TS, Tanzi EL. Hypertrophic scars and keloids: etiology and management. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4: 235-243
• 6 Berman B, Perez OA, Konda S. et al. A review of the biologic effects, clinical efficacy, and safety of silicone elastomer sheeting for hypertrophic and keloid scar treatment and management. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33: 1291-1302
• 7 Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Schalkwijk J. et al. On the nature of hypertrophic scars and keloids: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1435-1458
• 8 de Giorgi V, Sestini S, Mannone F. et al. The use of silicone gel in the treatment of fresh surgical scars: a randomized study. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34: 688-693
• 9 Gold MH, Foster TD, Adair MA. et al. Prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids by the prophylactic use of topical silicone gel sheets following a surgical procedure in an office setting. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 641-644
• 10 Momeni M, Hafezi F, Rahbar H. et al. Effects of silicone gel on burn scars. Burns 2009; 35: 70-74
• 11 Perkins K, Davey RB, Wallis KA. Silicone gel: a new treatment for burn scars and contractures. Burns Incl Therm Inj 1983; 9: 201-204
• 12 Mustoe TA. Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 82-92
• 13 O'Shaughnessy KD, De La Garza M, Roy NK. et al. Homeostasis of the epidermal barrier layer: a theory of how occlusion reduces hypertrophic scarring. Wound Repair Regen 2009; 17: 700-708
• 14 Shin TM, Bordeaux JS. The role of massage in scar management: a literature review. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38: 414-423
• 15 Holavanahalli RK, Helm PA, Parry IS. et al. Select practices in management and rehabilitation of burns: a survey report. J Burn Care Res 2011; 32: 210-223
• 16 Roques C. Massage applied to scars. Wound Repair Regen 2002; 10: 126-128
• 17 Patino O, Novick C, Merlo A. et al. Massage in hypertrophic scars. J Burn Care Rehabil 1999; 20: 268-271
• 18 Linares HA, Larson DL. Early differential diagnosis between hypertrophic and nonhypertrophic healing. J Invest Dermatol 1974; 62: 514-516
• 19 Beuth J, Hunzelmann N, Van Leendert R. et al. Safety and efficacy of local administration of contractubex to hypertrophic scars in comparison to corticosteroid treatment: results of a multicenter, comparative epidemiological cohort study in Germany. In Vivo 2006; 20: 277-283
• 20 Chang CC, Kuo YF, Chiu HC. et al. Hydration, not silicone, modulates the effects of keratinocytes on fibroblasts. J Surg Res 1995; 59: 705-711
• 21 Davey RB, Wallis KA, Bowering K. Adhesive contact media: an update on graft fixation and burn scar management. Burns 1991; 17: 313-319
• 22 Chan MW, Hinz B, McCulloch CA. Mechanical induction of gene expression in connective tissue cells. Methods Cell Biol 2010; 98: 178-205
• 23 Bhadal N, Wall IB, Porter SR. et al. The effect of mechanical strain on protease production by keratinocytes. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158: 396-398
• 24 Aarabi S, Bhatt KA, Shi Y. et al. Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis. FASEB J 2007; 21: 3250-3261