CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40(01): 36-43
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.1.36
Original Article

Lower Lip Reconstruction after Wide Excision of a Malignancy with Barrel-Shaped Excision or the Webster Modification of the Bernard Operation

Hyung Joon Seo
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
,
Seong Hwan Bae
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
,
Su Bong Nam
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
,
Soo Jong Choi
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
,
Joo Hyoung Kim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
,
Jae Woo Lee
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
,
Yong Chan Bae
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
› Author Affiliations
This work was supported for two years by a Pusan National University Research Grant.

Background Because there are numerous methods for reconstruction of the lower lip, it is not easy to choose the optimal method. In choosing the surgical method for lower lip reconstruction, we obtained acceptable outcomes based on our treatment strategy, which included either a barrel-shaped excision or the Webster modification of the Bernard operation. We report on the surgical outcomes based on our treatment strategy.

Methods This study included 26 patients who underwent lower lip reconstructive surgery from September 1996 to September 2010. The operation was done using either a barrel-shaped excision or the Webster modification, considering the location of the defect, the size of the defect, and the amount of residual tissue on the lateral side of the vermilion after excision.

Results In our series, 3 patients underwent a single barrel-shaped excision, and nine patients underwent a double barrel-shaped excision. In addition, the unilateral Webster modification was performed on in 6 patients, and there were eight cases of bilateral Webster modification. All of the patients except one were satisfied with the postoperative shape of the lip. In one case both recurrence and dehiscence occurred. One patient had a good postoperative lip shape, but had difficulty wearing a denture, and also underwent commissuroplasty. Furthermore, there were two patients who complained of drooling, and 4 with paresthesia.

Conclusions A soft tissue defect resulting from wide excision of a lower lip malignancy can be successfully reconstructed using only one of two surgical methods: the barrel-shaped excision or the Webster modification of the Bernard operation.

This article was presented at the 69th Congress of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons on November 11-13, 2011, in Seoul, Korea.




Publication History

Received: 04 October 2012

Accepted: 18 December 2012

Article published online:
01 May 2022

© 2013. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Brusati R. Reconstruction of labial commissure by a sliding U-shaped cheek flap. J Maxillofac Surg 1979; 7: 11-14
  • 2 Mazzola RF, Lupo G. Evolving concepts in lip reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1984; 11: 583-617
  • 3 Zilinsky I, Winkler E, Weiss G. et al. Total lower lip reconstruction with innervated muscle-bearing flaps: a modification of the Webster flap. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 687-691
  • 4 Wechselberger G, Gurunluoglu R, Bauer T. et al. Functional lower lip reconstruction with bilateral cheek advancement flaps: revisitation of Webster method with a minor modification in the technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002; 26: 423-428
  • 5 Bae YC, Kim SH, Hwang SM. et al. Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma on lower lip. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 25: 278-285
  • 6 Luce EA. Reconstruction of the lower lip. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22: 109-121
  • 7 Coppit GL, Lin DT, Burkey BB. Current concepts in lip reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12: 281-287
  • 8 Lee TJ, Kim TJ, Park JP. Lower lip reconstruction with barrel-shaped excision. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 24: 1425-1430
  • 9 Yotsuyanagi T, Nihei Y, Yokoi K. et al. Functional reconstruction using a depressor anguli oris musculocutaneous flap for large lower lip defects, especially for elderly patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 850-856
  • 10 Alic B, Gurel M, Cilengir M. et al. Unilateral gate flap for reconstruction of the lower lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84: 814-819
  • 11 Rudkin GH, Carlsen BT, Miller TA. Nasolabial flap reconstruction of large defects of the lower lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 810-817
  • 12 Webster RC, Coffey RJ, Kelleher RE. Total and partial reconstruction of the lower lip with innervated musclebearing flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1960; 25: 360-371