Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2017-01-CR-0012
Solving Interoperability in Translational Health
Perspectives of Students from the International Partnership in Health Informatics Education (IPHIE) 2016 Master Class Funding Several students at the University of Utah and the University of Washington were supported by the NIH National Library of Medicine (NLM) Training Program in Medical Informatics (University of Washington #T15-LM007442, Utah #T15-LM007124). The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.Publication History
received:
16 January 2017
accepted:
14 April 2017
Publication Date:
21 December 2017 (online)
Summary
Background: In the summer of 2016 an international group of biomedical and health informatics faculty and graduate students gathered for the 16th meeting of the International Partnership in Health Informatics Education (IPHIE) masterclass at the University of Utah campus in Salt Lake City, Utah. This international biomedical and health informatics workshop was created to share knowledge and explore issues in biomedical health informatics (BHI).
Objective: The goal of this paper is to summarize the discussions of biomedical and health informatics graduate students who were asked to define interoperability, and make critical observations to gather insight on how to improve biomedical education.
Methods: Students were assigned to one of four groups and asked to define interoperability and explore potential solutions to current problems of interoperability in health care.
Results: We summarize here the student reports on the importance and possible solutions to the “interoperability problem” in biomedical informatics. Reports are provided from each of the four groups of highly qualified graduate students from leading BHI programs in the US, Europe and Asia.
Conclusion: International workshops such as IPHIE provide a unique opportunity for graduate student learning and knowledge sharing. BHI faculty are encouraged to incorporate into their curriculum opportunities to exercise and strengthen student critical thinking to prepare our students for solving health informatics problems in the future.
Citation: Turner AM, Facell JC, Jaspers M, Wetter T, Pfeifer D, Gatewood LC, Adam T, Li Y-C, Lin M-C, Evans RS, Beukenhorst A, van Mens H, Tensen E, Bock C, Fendrich L, Seitz P, Suleder J, Aldekhyyel R, Bridgeman K, Hu Z, Sattler A, Guo S-Y, Mohaimenul IMd, Ningrum DNA, Tung H-R, Bian J, Plasek JM, Rommel C, Burke J, Sohi H. Solving interoperability in translational health: perspectives of students from the International Partnership in Health Informatics Education (IPHIE) 2016 master class. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8: 651–659 https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2017-01-CR-0012
Keywords
Clinical informatics - graduate education - interoperability - clinical data management - standardsProtection of Human and Animal Subjects
No human or animal subjects were included in this research.
-
References
- 1 Haux R, Ammenwerth E, Ter Burg WJ, Pilz J, Jaspers MWM. An international course on strategic information management for medical informatics students: Aim, content, structure, and experiences. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2004; 73 (02) 97-100.
- 2 Jaspers MW, Gardner RM, Gatewood LC, Haux R, Schmidt D, Wetter T. The International Partnership in Health Informatics Education. Medinfo MEDINFO 2004; 11 Pt 2 884-888.
- 3 Jaspers MWM, Gardner RM, Gatewood LC, Haux R, Evans RS. An international summer school on health informatics: A collaborative effort of the Amsterdam Medical Informatics Program and I E-the International Partnership for Health Informatics Education. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007; 76 (07) 538-546.
- 4 Jaspers MWM, Gardner RM, Gatewood LC, Haux R, Leven FJ, Limburg M, Ravesloot JH, Schmidt D, Wetter T. IPHIE: An International partnership in health informatics education. Studies in health technology and informatics 2000; 77: 549-553.
- 5 Jaspers MWM, Gardner RM, Gatewood LC, Haux R, Schmidt D, Wetter T. The international partnership for health informatics education: Lessons learned from six years of experience. Methods of information in medicine 2005; 44 (01) 25-31.
- 6 Vest JR, Gamm LD. Health information exchange: Persistent challenges and new strategies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2010; 17 (03) 288-294.
- 7 Hammami R, Bellaaj H, Hadj Kacem A. Interoperability for medical information systems: An overview. Health and Technology 2014; 4 (03) 261-272.
- 8 Jiang G, Evans J, Oniki TA, Coyle JF, Bain L, Huff SM, Kush R, Chute CG. Harmonization of detailed clinical models with clinical study data standards. Methods of information in medicine 2015; 54 (01) 65-74.
- 9 Hook JM, Pan E, Adler-Milstein J, Bu D, Walker J. The value of healthcare information exchange and inter-operability in New York state. AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium AMIA Symposium. 2006: 953.
- 10 Hersch WR, Totten AM, McDonagh MS. Outcomes From Health Information Exchange: Systematic Review and Future Research Needs. JMIR Medical Informatics 2015; 3 (04) e39.
- 11 Rudin RS, Motala A, Goldzweig CL, Shekelle PG. Usage and Effect of Health Information Exchange: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med; 2014: 161
- 12 Milstein-Adler J, Bates DW, Jha AK. A survey of Health Information Exchange Organizations in the United States: Implications for Meaningful Use. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011; 154 (10) 666-671.
- 13 Ziminski TB, Algarin ADLR, Saripalle R, Demurjian S, Jackson E. editors. SMARTSync: Towards patient-driven medication reconciliation. Proceedings –2012 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops. BIBMW 2012; 2012
- 14 Ziminski TB, Demurjian SA, Sanzi E, Agresta T. Maximizing Healthcare Delivery and Management through Technology Integration. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global; c2015. Chapter 16, Toward integrating healthcare data and systems: A study of architectural alternatives: p. 270-304.
- 15 Gaunt N, Roger-France F. Security of the electronic health care record--professional and ethical implications. Studies in health technology and informatics 1996; 27: 10-22.
- 16 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries. IEEE Std 610. New York, New York: IEEE; 1991. 217 p.
- 17 Bales ME, Kukafka R, Burkhardt A, Friedman C. Qualitative assessment of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health with respect to the desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006; 75 (05) 384-395.
- 18 Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods of information in medicine 1998; 37 (4–5) 394-403.
- 19 Haas SW, Travers DA. Issues in the development of a thesaurus for patients’ Chief Complaints in the Emergency Department. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting 2004; 41: 411-417.
- 20 Gonnering RS, Ogawa GSH, Bursell SE, Horton MB. Complexity of structure in electronic medical record systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; c 2014. Chapter 10, Complexity and the Human Experience: Modeling Complexity in the Humanities and Social Sciences: p. 203-219.
- 21 Brailer DJ. Interoperability: the key to the future health care system. Health affairs (Project Hope). 2005 Suppl. Web Exclusives.
- 22 Edmunds M, Peddicord D, and Frisse ME. Ten Reasons Why Interoperability Is Difficult. in: Weaver CA, Ball MJ, Kim GR, Kiel JM. (Eds.), Healthcare Information Management Systems: Cases, Strategies, and Solutions,. Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp 127-137.
- 23 Lieberman SA, Trumble JM, Smith ER. The Impact of Structured Student Debates on Critical Thinking and Informatics Skills of Second year Medical Students. Academic Medicine 2000; 75 (10) S84-S86.