Appl Clin Inform 2014; 05(02): 388-401
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0100
Research Article
Schattauer GmbH

Care Everywhere, a Point-to-Point HIE Tool

Utilization and Impact on Patient Care in the ED
TJ. Winden
1   Division of Applied Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
,
LL. Boland
1   Division of Applied Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
,
NG. Frey
1   Division of Applied Research, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
,
PA. Satterlee
2   Department of Emergency Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
,
JS. Hokanson
2   Department of Emergency Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 16 December 2013

Accepted: 19 February 2014

Publication Date:
21 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Background: Emergency departments (EDs) routinely struggle with gaps in information when providing patient care. A point to point health information exchange (HIE) model has the potential to effectively fill those gaps.

Objective: To examine the utility, perceived and actual, of a point-to-point HIE tool called Care Everywhere (CE) and its impact on patient care in the ED.

Methods: This mixed methods study was performed at four large hospital EDs between January 2012 and November 2012. Retrospective data was extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) to evaluate CE utilization since implementation. ED notes data were extracted from ED visits occurring between January 2012 and June 2012 and were reviewed to evaluate the impact of exchanged information on patient care.

Results: Per focus group discussions, physicians thought the information received via CE was of value to patient care, particularly laboratory results, imaging, medication lists, discharge summaries and ECG interpretations. They feel the greatest impact of HIE is the avoidance of duplicative diagnostic testing and the identification of drug-seeking behavior. Nursing and ancillary staff expressed somewhat less enthusiasm but still felt HIE positively impacted patient care. Over a period of six months, CE was used in approximately 1.46% of ED encounters. A review of ED provider notes over that time period revealed CE use resulted in 560 duplicate diagnostic procedures being avoided and 28 cases of drug seeking behavior identified.

Conclusion: Our study provides insight into the perceived value of HIE from the point of view of our ED physicians and staff. It also demonstrates that a point-to-point HIE tool such as Epic System’s Care Everywhere has the potential to generate greater efficiencies within the ED and impact to patient care through elimination of duplicative diagnostic imaging or testing and resource utilization associated with those procedures.

Citation: Winden TJ, Boland LL, Frey NG, Satterlee PA, Hokanson JS. Care everywhere, a point-to-point HIE tool: Utilization and impact on patient care in the ED. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 388–401 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0100

 
  • References

  • 1 Vest JR. More than just a question of technology: factors related to hospitals’ adoption and implementation of health information exchange. International journal of medical informatics 2010; 79 (12) 797-806.
  • 2 National Center For Health Statistics.. Health, United States, 2012: With Special Feature on Emergency Care,. Hyattsville, MD, 2013. Hyattsville, MD: National Center For Health Statistics,; 2004
  • 3 Hripcsak G, Sengupta S, Wilcox A, Green RA. Emergency department access to a longitudinal medical record. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007; 14 (Suppl. 02) 235-238.
  • 4 Institute of Medicine.. Hospital-Based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point. Washington, DC: National Academy Press,; 2006
  • 5 Stiell A, Forster AJ, Stiell IG, van Walraven C. Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne 2003; 169 (10) 1023-108.
  • 6 Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C, Parnes B, Dickinson LM, Van Vorst R, Westfall JM, Pace WD. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA 2005; 293 (Suppl. 05) 565-571.
  • 7 Minnesota Department of Health.. State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreement –Minnesota 2012 Strategic and Operation Plan Update. In: Technology MDoHOoHI, editor, 2012.
  • 8 Overhage JM, Dexter PR, Perkins SM, Cordell WH, McGoff J, McGrath R, McDonald CJ. A randomized, controlled trial of clinical information shared from another institution. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2002; 39 (Suppl. 01) 14-23.
  • 9 Vest JR. Health information exchange and healthcare utilization. Journal of Medical Systems 2009; 33 (Suppl. 03) 223-231.
  • 10 Frisse ME, Holmes RL. Estimated financial savings associated with health information exchange and ambulatory care referral. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2007; 40 (Suppl. 06) S27-S32.
  • 11 Johnson KB, Unertl KM, Chen Q, Lorenzi NM, Nian H, Bailey J, Frisse M. Health information exchange usage in emergency departments and clinics: the who, what, and why. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011; 18 (Suppl. 05) 690-697.
  • 12 Tzeel A, Lawnicki V, Pemble KR. The Business Case for Payer Support of a Community-Based Health Information Exchange : A Humana Pilot Evaluating Its Seeking Emergency Department Care. American Health & Drug Benefits 2011; 4: 207-216.
  • 13 Dixon BE, Zafar A, Overhage JM. A Framework for evaluating the costs, effort, and value of nationwide health information exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2010; 17 (Suppl. 03) 295-301.
  • 14 Office of the National Coordinator.. Nationwide Health Information Network, 2013.
  • 15 Gold MR, McLaughlin CG, Devers KJ, Berenson Ra, Bovbjerg RR. Obtaining providers’ ’buy-in’ and establishing effective means of information exchange will be critical to HITECH’s success. Health affairs (Project Hope) 2012; 31 (Suppl. 03) 514-526.
  • 16 Vest JR, Zhao H, Jasperson J, Jaspserson J, Gamm LD, Ohsfeldt RL. Factors motivating and affecting health information exchange usage. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011; 18 (Suppl. 02) 143-149.
  • 17 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS).. Topic Series: HIE Technical Models, 2009.
  • 18 Brailer DJ. From Santa Barbara to Washington: a person’s and a nation’s journey toward portable health information. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26 (Suppl. 05) w581-w588.
  • 19 Bailey JE, Pope RA, Elliott EC, Wan JY, Waters TM, Frisse ME. Health Information Exchange Reduces Repeated Diagnostic Imaging for Back Pain. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2013; 62 (Suppl. 01) 16-24.
  • 20 Cordell WH OJ, Waeklerle JF. Strategies for Improving Information Management in Emergency Medicine to Meet Clinical, Research, and Administrative Needs. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998: 2-8.
  • 21 Kalra J. Medical errors: an introduction to concepts. Clinical biochemistry 2004; 37 (12) 1043-1051.
  • 22 Shapiro JS, Kannry J, Kushniruk AW. Emergency physicians’ perceptions of health information exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007; 14: 700-705
  • 23 Finnell JT, Overhage JM, Dexter PR, Perkins SM, Lane KA, McDonald CJ. Community Clinical Data Exchange for Emergency Medicine Patients Regenstrief Institute for Health Care. AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium 2003: 235-238.
  • 24 Connelly DP, Park YT, Du J, Theera-Ampornpunt N, Gordon BD, Bershowv BA, Gensinger RA, Shrift M, Routhe DT, Speedie SM. The impact of electronic health records on care of heart failure patients in the emergency room. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011
  • 25 Lenert L, Sundwall D, Lenert ME. Shifts in the architecture of the Nationwide Health Information Network. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2012; 19 (Suppl. 04) 498-502.
  • 26 HIMSS 2008–2009 HIE Work Group.. A HIMSS Guide to Participating in Health Information Exchange. 2009
  • 27 Vest JR, Gamm LD. Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2010; 17 (Suppl. 03) 288-294.
  • 28 Frisse ME, Johnson KB, Nian H, Davison CL, Gadd CS, Unertl KM, Turri PA, Chen Q. The financial impact of health information exchange on emergency department care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011
  • 29 Unertl KM, Johnson KB, Lorenzi NM. Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of use. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011
  • 30 Ross SE. The effects of health information exchange adoption on ambulatory testing rates. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013