CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · South Asian J Cancer 2019; 08(04): 255-257
DOI: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_11_19
ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Sarcomas and Skin Cancer

Reverse sural flap – A feasible option for oncological defects of the lower extremity, ankle, and foot: Our experience from Northeast India

Abhijit Talukdar
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
,
Jitin Yadav
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
,
Joydeep Purkayastha
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
,
Niju Pegu
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
,
Pritesh R. Singh
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
,
Revanth K. Kodali
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
,
Dwipen Kalita
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
,
Srinivas Bannoth
Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr. B. Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati, Assam, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Background: Soft-tissue management around the lower third of the leg and foot presents a challenge to the surgeon. To achieve local control of tumor, additional surgical margins are required, thus creating large soft-tissue defects. The reverse sural artery flap (RSAF) is a popular option for many of these defects. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 26 patients who underwent resection of tumor around the lower leg, ankle, and foot, and reconstruction with RSAF was performed at our institute from 2012 to 2018. Results: Among the 26 studied patients, aged between 22 and 71 (mean age: 50.8) years, 5 were female and rest were male. The most common site of involvement by tumor was heel (42.3%), followed by sole (26.9%). The most common histopathological diagnosis was melanoma (61.5%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (26.9%) and soft-tissue sarcoma (11.5%). Conclusion: The distally based sural flap is a reliable flap for the coverage of soft-tissue defects following oncological defects of the distal lower extremity and foot.



Publication History

Article published online:
14 December 2020

© 2019. MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Li X, Cui J, Maharjan S, Lu L, Gong X. Reconstruction of the foot and ankle using pedicled or free flaps: Perioperative flap survival analysis. PLoS One 2016;11:e0167827.
  • 2 Taylor GI, Pan WR. Angiosomes of the leg: Anatomic study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:599-616.
  • 3 Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. Cadaver studies of correlation between vessel size and anatomical territory of cutaneous supply. Br J Plast Surg 1986;39:300-6.
  • 4 Afifi AM, Mahboub TA, Losee JE, Smith DM, Khalil HH. The reverse sural flap: Modifications to improve efficacy in foot and ankle reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61:430-6.
  • 5 Masquelet AC, Romana MC, Wolf G. Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: Anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1115-21.
  • 6 Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Fukuzumi S, Minabe T, Fukui Y, Miyasaka T, et al. Accompanying arteries of the lesser saphenous vein and sural nerve: Anatomic study and its clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:104-20.
  • 7 Le Fourn B, Caye N, Pannier M. Distally based sural fasciomuscular flap: Anatomic study and application for filling leg or foot defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:67-72.
  • 8 Yilmaz M, Karatas O, Barutcu A. The distally based superficial sural artery island flap: Clinical experiences and modifications. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:2358-67.
  • 9 Hasegawa M, Torii S, Katoh H, Esaki S. The distally based superficial sural artery flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:1012-20.
  • 10 Hollier L, Sharma S, Babigumira E, Klebuc M. Versatility of the sural fasciocutaneous flap in the coverage of lower extremity wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:1673-9.
  • 11 Hollenbeck ST, Woo S, Komatsu I, Erdmann D, Zenn MR, Levin LS, et al. Longitudinal outcomes and application of the subunit principle to 165 foot and ankle free tissue transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:924-34.
  • 12 Follmar KE, Baccarani A, Baumeister SP, Levin LS, Erdmann D. The distally based sural flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;119:138e-148e.
  • 13 McHenry TP, Early JS, Schacherer TG. Peroneus brevis rotation flap: Anatomic considerations and clinical experience. J Trauma 2001;50:922-6.
  • 14 Eren S, Ghofrani A, Reifenrath M. The distally pedicled peroneus brevis muscle flap: A new flap for the lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1443-8.
  • 15 Pai CH, Lin GT, Lin SY, Lin SD, Lai CS. Extensor digitorum brevis rotational muscle flap for lower leg and ankle coverage. J Trauma 2000;49:1012-6.
  • 16 Barclay TL, Sharpe DT, Chisholm EM. Cross-leg fasciocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;72:843-7.
  • 17 Ambroggio G, Oberto E, Teich-Alasia S. Twenty years' experience using the cross-leg flap technique. Ann Plast Surg 1982;9:152-63.
  • 18 Sundell B, Takolander R. Repair of skin and soft tissue loss of the lower leg with cross-leg flaps. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1976;65:332-7.
  • 19 Ahmed SK, Fung BK, Ip WY, Fok M, Chow SP. The versatile reverse flow sural artery neurocutaneous flap: A case series and review of literature. J Orthop Surg Res 2008;3:15.
  • 20 Dhamangaonkar AC, Patankar HS. Reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap with a cutaneous pedicle to cover distal lower limb soft tissue defects: Experience of 109 clinical cases. J Orthop Traumatol 2014;15:225-9.
  • 21 Kang HG, Kim JH, Cho HS, Han I, Oh JH, Kim HS. Soft tissue reconstruction of the foot using the distally based island pedicle flap after resection of malignant melanoma. Clin Orthop Surg 2010;2:244-9.
  • 22 Liu JF, Zhao LR, Lu LJ, Chen L, Liu ZG, Gong X, et al. Limb salvage surgery following resection of a melanoma: Foot and ankle reconstruction using cutaneous flaps. Oncol Lett 2014;8:1966-72.
  • 23 Yiacoumettis A, Mallouris A. Reconstructive options for defects after melanoma excision in the foot and ankle region. J Foot Ankle Surg 2011;50:498-503.
  • 24 Parrett BM, Pribaz JJ, Matros E, Przylecki W, Sampson CE, Orgill DP. Risk analysis for the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap in distal leg reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1499-504.
  • 25 Ebrahimi A, Nejadsarvari N, Shams Koushki E. Experience with reverse sural flap to cover defects of the lower leg and foot. Trauma Mon 2012;16:178-81.
  • 26 Ignatiadis IA, Tsiampa VA, Galanakos SP, Georgakopoulos GD, Gerostathopoulos NE, Ionac M, et al. The reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap for the treatment of traumatic, infectious or diabetic foot and ankle wounds: A retrospective review of 16 patients. Diabet Foot Ankle 2011;2:doi:10.3402/dfa.v2i0.5653.
  • 27 Larrañaga JJ, Picco PI, Yanzon A, Figari M. Reconstruction of hind and mid-foot defects after melanoma resection using the reverse sural flap: A case series. Surg J (N Y) 2017;3:e124-7.