CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2020; 30(03): 392-394
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_407_20
Case Report

Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: An imaging enigma

Saksham P Yadav
Department of Radiology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Shivam D Kotak
Department of Radiology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Sachin Kumar
Department of Radiology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Vishnu S Pujari
Department of Radiology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Akhila Chandrasekaran
Department of Radiology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

The pancreatic tail is an uncommon location for the accessory spleen. Although it is a benign entity, it can mimic and get misdiagnosed as a pancreatic tumor which can lead to unnecessary biopsy and surgery. Here, we present a case who was detected to have a tail of pancreas mass. On CT and MRI, it showed similar density, signal intensity, and matching enhancement pattern with the orthotopic spleen. The ADC value of the mass was found to be similar to that of the spleen and significantly less than that of normal pancreas. A diagnosis of intrapancreatic accessory spleen was hence made and the patient was followed up after 6 months on MRI. No change in lesion morphology and size was noted. Thus, intrapancreatic accessory spleen should be kept in mind as a differential diagnosis while reviewing a case with pancreatic mass.



Publication History

Received: 22 May 2020

Accepted: 24 July 2020

Article published online:
19 July 2021

© 2020. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Saunders TA, Miller TR, Khanafshar E. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: Utilization of fine needle aspiration for diagnosis of a potential mimic of a pancreatic neoplasm. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7: S62-5
  • 2 Guo W, Han W, Liu J, Jin L, Li J-S, Zhang Z-T. et al. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: A case report and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1141-3
  • 3 Rosenkranz W, Kamhi B, Horowitz M. Retroperitoneal accessory spleen simulating a suprarenal mass. Br J Radiol 1969; 42: 939-42
  • 4 Matthaei H, Schmelzle M, Braunstein S, Bölke E, Peiper M. Pancreatic incidentalomas: A growing clinical challenge exemplified by an intrapancreatic accessory spleen. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2011; 123: 186-8
  • 5 Churei H, Inoue H, Nakajo M. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: Case report. Abdom Imaging 1998; 23: 191-3
  • 6 Hayward I, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen mimicking pancreatic mass on CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 984-5
  • 7 Harris GN, Kase DJ, Bradnock H, Mckinley MJ. Accessory spleen causing a mass in the tail of the pancreas: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 1120-1
  • 8 Jang KM, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Park MJ, Lee MH, Choi D. Differentiation of an intrapancreatic accessory spleen from a small (<3-cm) solid pancreatic tumor: Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2013; 266: 159-67
  • 9 Takayama T, Shimada K, Inoue K, Wakao F, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen. Lancet 1994; 344: 957-8
  • 10 Giambelluca D. The “zebra spleen.”. Abdom Radiol 2019; 44: 1189-90
  • 11 Ding Q, Ren Z, Wang J, Ma X, Zhang J, Sun G. et al. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: Evaluation with CT and MRI. Exp Ther Med 2018; 16: 3623-31