CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2021; 31(S 01): S161-S169
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_377_20
Original Article

Diagnostic accuracy and false-positive rate of chest CT as compared to RT-PCR in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: A prospective cohort of 612 cases from India and review of literature

Reddy Ravikanth
Department of Radiology, St. John’s Hospital, Kattappana, Kerala, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Background: At present, the diagnosis of COVID-19 depends on real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCT). On imaging, computed tomography (CT) manifestations resemble those seen in viral pneumonias, with multifocal ground-glass opacities and consolidation in a peripheral distribution being the most common findings. Although these findings lack specificity for COVID-19 diagnosis on imaging grounds, CT could be used to provide objective assessment about the extension of the lung opacities, which could be used as an imaging surrogate for disease burden. Chest CT scan may be helpful in early diagnosing of COVID-19. Objective: The current study investigated the diagnostic accuracy and false-positive rate of chest CT in detecting COVID-19 pneumoniain a population with clinical suspicion using RT-PCR testing as reference standard. Materials and Methods: In this prospective single centerstudy performed on 612 cases with clinical suspicion of COVID-19, all adult symptomatic ED patients had both a CT scan and a PCR upon arrival at the hospital. CT results were compared with PCR test (s) and diagnostic accuracy was calculated. Results: Between February 15, 2020 to July 15, 2020, 612 symptomatic ED patients were included. In total, 78.5% of patients had a positive PCR and 82.8% a positive CT, resulting in a sensitivity of 94.2%, specificity 76.4%, likelihood ratio (LR) + 2.94 and (LR) - 0.18.The PPV was 76.7% and NPV 94.1%. The sensitivity of the CT tended to be higher (100.0%) in those with severe risk pneumonia than in patients with low/medium risk pneumonia (90.3%, P = 0.42). In patients with sepsis, sensitivity was significantly higher than in those without sepsis (99.5 vs. 63.5%, P < 0.001). The diagnostic ability of chest CT was found to be rather high with 92.1%, concordance rate between findings of CT and PCR. In 48 (7.8%) patients discordant findings between CT and PCR were observed. The positive predictive values (PPV) and accuracy of chest CT in diagnosing COVID-19 were higher in patients ≥60 years than that in patients <60 years (P = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). The specificity and NPV of chest CT in diagnosing COVID-19 were greater for women than that for men (P = 0.007 and 0.03, respectively); and no difference existed for sensitivity, PPV and accuracy (P = 0.43, 0.69 and 0.31, respectively). In most cases, the CT scan was considered suspicious for COVID-19, while the PCR was negative (37/48, 70.8%). In the majority of these, the diagnosis at discharge was pulmonary infection (n = 26; 74.3%). The current study included repeated PCRs and explored discordant test results, which showed that in about 45.9% of patients with false-positive CT scans, other viral pathogens were detected. The false-positive rate of CT findings in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia was 7.2%. Conclusion: High diagnostic accuracy of chest CT findings with typical and relatively atypical CT manifestations of COVID-19 leads to a low rate of missed diagnosis. Normal chest CT can be found in RT-PCR positive COVID-19 cases, and typical CT manifestations can be found in RT-PCR negative cases. Therefore, a combination of both CT and RT-PCR for future follow-up, management and medical surveillance is recommended considering the false-positive results of chest CT in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia.



Publication History

Received: 16 May 2020

Accepted: 02 January 2020

Article published online:
13 July 2021

© 2021. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020; 323: 1239-42
  • 2 Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y. et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 1199-207
  • 3 WHO. 2020 “We now have a name for the #2019nCoV disease: COVID-19. I’ll spell it: C-O-V-I-D hyphen one nine – COVID-19”. Tweet, 11 February, viewed 2020Feb11. Available from: https://twitter.com/WHO/status/1227248333871173632.
  • 4 Wuhan Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Global Cases (by Johns Hopkins CSSE). Case Dashboard. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 24].
  • 5 Zhu Y, Liu YL, Li ZP, Kuang JY, Li XM, Yang YY. et al. Clinical and CT imaging features of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). J Infect 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.022.
  • 6 Ng K, Poon BH, Kiat Puar TH, Shan Quah JL, Loh WJ, Wong YJ. et al. COVID-19 and the risk to health care workers: A case report. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172: 766-7
  • 7 Xie X, Zhong Z, Zhao W, Zheng C, Wang F, Liu J. Chest CT for typical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: Relationship to negative RT-PCR testing. Radiology 2020; 296: E41-5
  • 8 WHO. Laboratory testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in suspected human cases. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/laboratory-testing-for-2019-novel-coronavirus-in suspected-human-cases-20200117. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 24].
  • 9 Li Y, Xia L. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Role of chest CT in diagnosis and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214: 1280-6
  • 10 Bernheim A, Mei X, Huang M, Yang Y, Fayad ZA, Zhang N. et al. Chest CT findings in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): Relationship to duration of infection. Radiology 2020; 295: 200463 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200463.
  • 11 Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, Sverzellati N, Kanne JP, Raoof S. et al. The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2020; 296: 172-80
  • 12 Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W. et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 cases. Radiology 2020; 296: E32-40
  • 13 Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, Cao Y, Alwalid O, Gu J. et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20: 425-34
  • 14 Inui S, Fujikawa A, Jitsu M, Kunishima N, Watanabe S, Suzuki Y. et al. Chest CT findings in cases from the cruise ship “diamond princess” with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). RadiolCardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2: e200110
  • 15 Zu ZY, Jiang MD, Xu PP, Chen W, Ni QQ, Lu GM. et al. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A perspective from China. Radiology 2020; 296: E15-25
  • 16 Guan W, Liu J, Yu C. CT findings of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severe pneumonia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214: W85-6
  • 17 Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, Lin M, Ying L, Pang P. et al. Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: Comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology 2020; 296: E115-7
  • 18 He JL, Luo L, Luo ZD, Lyu JX, Ng MY, Shen XP. et al. Diagnostic performance between CT and initial real-time RT-PCR for clinically suspected 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients outside Wuhan, China. Respir Med 2020; 168: 105980 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105980.
  • 19 Liu KC, Xu P, Lv WF, Qiu XH, Yao JL, Gu JF. et al. CT manifestations of coronavirus disease-2019: A retrospective analysis of 73 cases by disease severity. Eur J Radiol 2020; 126: 108941 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108941.
  • 20 Albarello F, Pianura E, Di Stefano F, Cristofaro M, Petrone A, Marchioni L. et al. 2019-novel Coronavirus severe adult respiratory distress syndrome in two cases in Italy: An uncommon radiological presentation. Int J InfectDis 2020; 93: 192-7
  • 21 Eng J, Bluemke D. Imaging publications in the COVID-19 pandemic: Applying new research results to clinical practice. Radiology 2020; 297: E228-31
  • 22 Miller W, Shah R. Isolated diffuse ground-glass opacity in thoracic CT: Causes and clinical presentations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 613-22
  • 23 Koo HJ, Lim S, Choe J, Choi SH, Sung H, Do KH. Radiographic and CT features ofviral pneumonia. Radiographics 2018; 38: 719-39