CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2019; 29(04): 442-447
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_353_19
Case Report

Imaging diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome in two cases confirmed on genetic studies - with a brief review

Shabnam Bhandari Grover
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Aanchal Bhayana
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
,
Hemal Grover
Department of Radiology and Imaging, Mount Sinai West, New York, USA
,
Seema Kapoor
Department of Genetics, Maulana Azad Medical College
,
Harish Chellani
Department of Paediatric Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Crouzon syndrome is the most common form of craniofacial dysostosis, characterised by a classical triad of abnormal skull shape, abnormal facies, and exophthalmos. The clinically overt dental abnormalities in these patients, distracts clinicians from the developmental neurological defects and therefore this entity remains relatively under - highlighted in radiology literature. We report and highlight the role of imaging in diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome in two patients, and discuss the relevant differential diagnosis. Moreover, our report is among the few Indian studies in which Crouzon syndrome was confirmed by genetic studies. The classical clinical triad of Crouzon syndrome was observed in both patients. The skull radiographs and cranial CT with 3D reconstruction VRT (Volume rendered technique), revealed characteristic radiological features. Genetic studies reconfirmed the clinical and radiological diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome, in both patients.



Publication History

Received: 04 September 2019

Accepted: 26 September 2019

Article published online:
21 July 2021

© 2019. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Mohan RS, Vemanna NS, Verma S, Agarwal N. Crouzon syndrome: Clinico-radiological illustration of a case. J Clin Imaging Sci 2012; 2: 70
  • 2 Tanwar R, Iyengar AR, Nagesh KS, Subhash BV. Crouzons syndrome: A case report with review of literature. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013; 31: 118-20
  • 3 Gaur A, Maheshwari S, Verma SK, Tariq M. Crouzon syndrome: A comprehensive review and case report. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2017; 6: 114-7
  • 4 Padmanabhan V, Hegde AM, Rai K. Crouzon’s syndrome: A review of literature and case report. Contemp Clin Dent 2011; 2: 211-4
  • 5 Pournima G, Monica Y, Meghna S. Crouzon syndrome: A case report. European J Dent Med 2011; 10: 1-5
  • 6 Haroop K, Waraich HS, Sharma CM. Crouzon syndrome. A case report and review of literature. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 58: 381-2
  • 7 Fan J, Li Y, Jia R, Fan X. An inherited FGFR2 mutation increased osteogenesis gene expression and result in Crouzon syndrome. BMC Med Genet 2018; 19: 91
  • 8 Lowe LH, Booth TN, Joglar JM, Rollins NK. Midface anomalies in children. Radiographics 2000; 20: 907-22
  • 9 Delashaw JB, Persing JA, Broaddus WC, Jane JA. Cranial vault growth in craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1989; 70: 159-65
  • 10 Delashaw JB, Persing JA, Jane JA. Cranial deformation in craniosynostosis. A new explanation. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1991; 2: 611-20
  • 11 Khanna PC, Thapa MM, Iyer RS, Prasad SS. Pictorial essay: The many faces of craniosynostosis. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2011; 21: 49-56
  • 12 Kumar DS, Murugesan D, Murugan K, Subramanian D, Maheshwari SU. Crouzon Syndrome: Report in a Family. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10: ZJ02-03
  • 13 Mitchell LA, Kitley CA, Armitage TL, Krasnokutsky MV, Rooks VJ. Normal sagittal and coronal suture widths by using CT imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1801-5
  • 14 Furuya Y, Edwards MS, Alpers CE, Tress BM, Norman D, Ousterhout DK. Computerized tomography of cranial sutures. Part 2: Abnormalities of sutures and skull deformity in craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1984; 61: 59-70
  • 15 Anantheswar YN, Venkataramana NK. Pediatric craniofacial surgery for craniosynostosis: Our experience and current concepts: Part -1. J Pediatric Neurosci 2009; 4: 86-99
  • 16 Eley KA, Watt-Smith SR, Sheerin F, Golding SJ. “Black Bone” MRI: A potential alternative to CT with three-dimensional reconstruction of the craniofacial skeleton in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 2417-26
  • 17 Kimonis V, Gold JA, Hoffman TL, Panchal J, Boyadjiev SA. Genetics of craniosynostosis. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2007; 14: 150-61
  • 18 Delahaye S, Bernard JP, Rénier D, Ville Y. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal craniosynostosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 347-53
  • 19 Schwartz M, Kreiborg S, Skovby F. First-trimester prenatal diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1996; 16: 155-8
  • 20 Faro C, Benoit B, Wegrzyn P, Chaoui R, Nicolaides KH. Three-dimensional sonographic description of the fetal frontal bones and metopic suture. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 618-21
  • 21 Ylikontiola LP, Sándor GK, Salokorpi N, Serlo WS. Experience with craniosynostosis treatment using posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2012; 2: 4-7