CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2020; 30(01): 64-69
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_333_19
Miscalleneous

A study to assess the knowledge and practice of medical professionals on radiation protection in interventional radiology

Mohsen Shafiee
Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasouj
,
Razieh Rashidfar
Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
,
Jamil Abdolmohammadi
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
,
Sajad Borzoueisileh
Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasouj
,
Zaker Salehi
Department of Radiation Sciences, School of Paramedical Sciences, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasouj
,
Kheibar Dashtian
Department of Chemistry, Yasouj University, Yasouj
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship The study was supported by Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.

Abstract

Objective: Ionizing radiation has been extensively used in medical procedures throughout the world. Such interventional radiological procedures could result in occupational exposure that needs urgent control. Therefore, MPs (medical professionals) should receive education and appropriate training on occupational radiation protection. In this context, the present study is aimed to investigate the MPs’ knowledge and practice regarding radiation protection principles during interventional radiological procedures. Material and Methods: A descriptive questionnaire-based study was carried out among 215 MPs involved in interventional fluoroscopy procedures. The practice of 31 MPs was studied using a checklist based on ALARA principles and ICRP guidelines. Results: A total of 43.3% and 45.1% answered correctly for knowledge and practice. However, the difference between radiation protection knowledge and practice between the physicians and nurses was statistically significant. The knowledge and practice survey of MPs demonstrated that nurses rarely adhered to radiation-protection measures. Conclusion: The present study reflects the lack of knowledge and practice concerning radiation protection concepts among the nurses. This deficiency needs to be resolved by periodic practical radiation protection courses in the curriculum of medicine.



Publication History

Received: 06 August 2019

Accepted: 28 January 2020

Article published online:
19 July 2021

© 2020. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Miller DL. Overview of contemporary interventional fluoroscopy procedures. Health Phys 2008; 95: 638-44
  • 2 Valentin J. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 2000; 30: 7-7
  • 3 Barr JMB, Schiska AD. Radiologic safety: Historical perspectives and contemporary recommendations. J Radiol Nurs 2005; 24: 6-10
  • 4 Cupitt J, Vinayagam S, McConachie I. Radiation exposure of nurses on an intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 183
  • 5 Grover SB, Kumar J, Gupta A, Khanna L. Protection against radiation hazards: Regulatory bodies, safety norms, does limits and protection devices. Indian J Radiol Imag 2002; 12: 157-67
  • 6 Grover S, Kumar J. A review of the current concepts of radiation measurement and its biological effects. Indian J Radiol Imag 2002; 12: 21-32
  • 7 Muirhead CR, O’Hagan JA, Haylock RG, Phillipson MA, Willcock T, Berridge GL. et al. Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: Third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 206-12
  • 8 Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C. et al. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: Retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ 2005; 331: 77
  • 9 Teschke K, Chow Y, Chung J, Ratner P, Spinelli J, Le N. et al. Estimating nurses’ exposures to ionizing radiation: The elusive gold standard. J Occup Environ Hyg 2007; 5: 75-84
  • 10 J. Thurston NCRP report no. 160: ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Phys Med Biol 55 2010; 6327
  • 11 UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). 2008. Effects of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 2006 report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes. 1. United Nations, New York: 40-42
  • 12 Authors on behalf of ICRP. Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ. et al. 118, I.P., ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs–threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 2012; 41: 1-333
  • 13 Little MP, Kitahara CM, Cahoon EK, Bernier MO, Velazquez-Kronen R, Doody MM. et al. Occupational radiation exposure and risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists. Eur J Epidemiol 2018; 33: 1179-91
  • 14 Velazquez-Kronen R, Borrego D, Gilbert ES, Miller DL, Moysich KB, Freudenheim JL. et al. Cataract risk in US radiologic technologists assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: Aretrospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2019; 76: 317-25
  • 15 Protection R. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: 2
  • 16 Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Achenbach S, Brennan PC, Rainford LS, Dodd JD. Breast surface radiation dose during coronary CT angiography: Reduction by breast displacement and lead shielding. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 367-73
  • 17 Flôr RdC, Gelbcke FL. Radiation protection and the attitude of nursing staff in a cardiac catherization laboratory. Texto Contexto-Enferm 2013; 22: 416-22
  • 18 Omar A, Kadesjö N, Palmgren C, Marteinsdottir M, Segerdahl T, Fransson A. et al. Assessment of the occupational eye lens dose for clinical staff in interventional radiology, cardiology and neuroradiology. J Radiol Prot 2017; 37: 145-59
  • 19 Troisi K, Ferreira N. Radiation exposure to orthopaedic registrars in the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Complex. SA Orthop J 2016; 15: 38-42
  • 20 Thambura MJ, Vinette CI. Nurses’ knowledge of ionizing radiation in northern gauteng state hospitals in South Africa. J Radiol Nursing 2019; 38: 56-60
  • 21 Shafiee M, Hoseinnezhad E, Vafapour H, Borzoueisileh S, Ghorbani M, Rashidfar R. Hematological findings in medical professionals involved at intraoperative fluoroscopy. Glob J Health Sci 2016; 8: 232
  • 22 Rehani MM, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Vañó E, Miller DL, Walsh S, Giordano BD, Persliden J. 117, I.P., Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department. Ann. ICRP 2010; 40: 1-102
  • 23 Whitby M, Martin CJ. A study of the distribution of dose across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists. Br J Radiol 2014
  • 24 Siddiqui SS, Jha A, Konar N, Ranganathan P, Deshpande DD, Divatia JV. Radiation exposure among medical professionals working in the Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2014; 18: 591-5
  • 25 Dianati M, Zaheri A, Talari HR, Deris F, Rezaei S. Intensive care nurses’ knowledge of radiation safety and their behaviors towards portable radiological examinations. NursMidwifery Stud 2014; 3: e23354
  • 26 Alotaibi M, Saeed R. Radiology nurses’ awareness of radiation. J Radiol Nurs 2006; 25: 7-12
  • 27 Alzubaidi MA, al Mutairi HH, Alakel SM, Al Abdullah HAS, Albakri IA, Alqahtani SFA. Assessment of knowledge and attitude of nurses towards ionizing radiation during radiography in Jeddah City, 2017. Egypt J Hosp Med 2017; 69: 2906-9
  • 28 Amis Jr ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM. et al. American college of radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am CollRadiol 2007; 4: 272-84
  • 29 Keijzers GB, Britton CJ. Doctors’ knowledge of patient radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging requested in the emergency department. Med J Aust 2010; 193: 450-3
  • 30 Hyde A, Coughlan B, Naughton C, Hegarty J, Savage E, Grehan J. et al. Nurses’, physicians’ and radiographers’ perceptions of the safety of a nurse prescribing of ionising radiation initiative: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2016; 58: 21-30
  • 31 McCusker M, de Blacam C, Keogan M, McDermott R, Beddy P. Survey of medical students and junior house doctors on the effects of medical radiation: Is medical education deficient?. Irish JMed Sci 2009; 178: 479-83
  • 32 Slechta AM, Reagan JT. An examination of factors related to radiation protection practices. Radiol Technol 2008; 79: 297-305
  • 33 Soye JA, Paterson A. A Survey of Awareness of Radiation Dose among Health Professionals in Northern Ireland. The British Journal of Radiology 81: 725-729
  • 34 Ohno K, Kaori T. Effective education in radiation safety for nurses. RadProt Dosimetry 2011; 147: 343-5
  • 35 Badawy MK, Mong KS, Paul Lykhun U, Deb P. An assessment of nursing staffs’ knowledge of radiation protection and practice. J Radiol Prot 2016; 36: 178-83