CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2018; 28(04): 465-469
DOI: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_129_18
Endocrine (Thyroid, Adrenal, Breast)

Normal adrenal gland thickness on computerized tomography in an Asian Indian adult population

Reetu John
Departments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Tharani Putta
Departments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Betty Simon
Departments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Anu Eapen
Departments of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Felix Jebasingh
Departments of Endocrinology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Nihal Thomas
Departments of Endocrinology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
,
Simon Rajaratnam
Departments of Endocrinology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor: Financial support and sponsorship Nil.

Abstract

Context: The size and morphology of the adrenal glands are affected by several physiological and pathological conditions. Radiologists need to be aware of the normal thickness of adrenal gland to accurately assess patients with suspected adrenal pathology. However, there is limited data on the normal size of the adrenal glands. Moreover, this has not been studied in our population. Aims: To study the normal thickness of adrenal gland on computerized tomography (CT) in Indian adult population. Settings and Design: Retrospective study in a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. Subjects and Methods: Our study included 586 adults who underwent a CT abdominal angiogram over 15 months, and excluding patients with clinical or imaging evidence of adrenal disease. The measurements made included: the maximum thickness of the body, medial and lateral limbs, measured perpendicular to the long axis. Results: The median age was 51 (range: 18–85) years. The mean maximum thickness of the adrenal body, medial, and lateral limbs were 7.2 ± 1.8, 4.1 ± 1.1, and 4.3 ± 1.1 mm on the right side and 8.8 ± 1.9, 4.7 ± 1.1, and 4.9 ± 1.3 mm on the left. The cumulative thickness of the body and the limbs were 15.6 ± 3.7 mm and 18.4 ± 3.8 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in all the measurements between the right and left adrenal glands (all P values = 0.000) and between men and women, being larger in men (P value <0.05). Among our patients 27% had at least one adrenal gland body measuring ≥10 mm in thickness. Conclusions: Our study has defined the normal range of adrenal gland thickness in an Asian Indian adult population, which may be used as a baseline reference for future research and as a reference for radiological reporting.



Publication History

Article published online:
26 July 2021

© 2018. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Vincent JM, Morrison ID, Armstrong P, Reznek RH. The size of normal adrenal glands on computed tomography. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 453-5
  • 2 Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, Dralle H, Newell-Price J, Sahdev A. et al. Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European society of endocrinology clinical practice guideline in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors. Eur J Endocrinol 2016; 175: G1-34
  • 3 Montagne J, Kressel H, Korobkin M, Moss A. Computed tomography of the normal adrenal glands. Am J Roentgenol 1978; 130: 963-6
  • 4 Akin D, Yilmaz M. Morphometric analysis of suprarenal glands (adrenal glands) with multislice computerized tomography. Int J Morphol 2017; 35: 120-7
  • 5 Tang YZ, Bharwani N, Micco M, Akker S, Rockall AG, Sahdev A. et al. The prevalence of incidentally detected adrenal enlargement on CT. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: e37-42
  • 6 Vincent JM, Morrison ID, Armstrong P, Reznek RH. Computed tomography of diffuse, non-metastatic enlargement of the adrenal glands in patients with malignant disease. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 456-60
  • 7 Wang X, Jin ZY, Xue HD, Liu W, Sun H, Chen Y. et al. Evaluation of normal adrenal gland volume by 64-slice CT. Chin Med Sci J 2013; 27: 220-4
  • 8 Schneller J, Reiser M, Beuschlein F, Osswald A, Pallauf A, Riester A. et al. Linear and volumetric evaluation of the adrenal gland – MDCT-based measurements of the adrenals. Acad Radiol 2014; 21: 1465-74
  • 9 Hamidi C. Evaluation of adrenal gland thickness by multi-detector computerized tomography. J Clin Exp Investig 2012; 3: 392-4
  • 10 Karstaedt N, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, Melson GL, Levitt RG. Computed tomography of the adrenal gland. Radiology 1978; 129: 723-30
  • 11 Li LL, Gu WJ, Dou JT, Yang GQ, Lv ZH, Mu YM. et al. Incidental adrenal enlargement: An overview from a retrospective study in a Chinese population. Int J Endocrinol 2015; 2015: 192874