A comprehensive functional classification of cleft hand: The DAST concept

ABSTRACT

Context: Phenotypic expressions of the congenital cleft hand are variable and might baffle even the experienced as to the choice of surgery. The morphological parameters defining the anomaly dictate not only the functional capacity of the anomalous hand but also the degree of possible surgical restoration. Despite a large number of classifying systems available, none encompass all the relevant issues. Aims: The purpose of this work is to present an all-inclusive and universally acceptable classification of the deformity which would graphically represent the entire gamut of possible presentations; principal and associated. Furthermore, based on such staging, the choice of surgical procedure and the stages of surgical intervention can be standardised to ensure the best results for the patient. Patients and Methods: This study is based on a series of 27 patients with a total of 38 cleft hands. Results and Conclusions: The necessity to include and to assess all determinants of function and complexity in these hands to standardise the choice of management, gave rise to the DAST system of classification; an acronym for all the morphological determinants of the anomaly (D = Digits missing, A = Associated anomalies in the hand, S = Site of cleft, T = Functional state of the Thumb). Numerical values were assigned to each component in increasing order of complexity. Score for each determinant as well as the aggregate score indicates the degree of complexity in a graphic manner. The DAST classification has a predictive value in choice of procedure and prognosticating surgical outcomes.

KEY WORDS

Classification - cleft hand - diagnosis - surgical management

• REFERENCES

• 1 Kozin SH. Upper-Extremity congenital anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1564-76
• 2 Manske PR, Oberg KC. Classification and developmental biology of congenital anomalies of the hand and upper extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (Suppl. 04) 3-18
• 3 Miura T, Suzuki M. Clinical differences between typical and atypical cleft hand. J Hand Surg Br 1984; 9: 311-5
• 4 Ogino T. Teratologic relationship between polydactyly, syndactyly and cleft hand. J Hand Surg Br 1990; 15: 201-9
• 5 Manske PR. Symbrachydactyly instead of atypical cleft hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 196
• 6 Miura T. New ideas on classification of congenital malformations. In: Buck-Gramcko D. editor. Congenital Malformations of the Hand and Forearm. London: Churchill-Livingstone; 1998: p. 9-16
• 7 Watari S, Tsuge K. A classification of cleft hands, based on clinical findings: Theory of developmental mechanism. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64: 381-9
• 8 Nutt 3^rd JN, Flatt AE. Congenital central hand deficit. J Hand Surg Am 1981; 6: 48-60
• 9 Ogino T. Cleft hand. Hand Clin 1990; 6: 661-71
• 10 Blauth W, Falliner A. Morphology and classification of cleft hands. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1986; 18: 161-95
• 11 Manske PR, Halikis MN. Surgical classification of central deficiency according to the thumb web. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20: 687-97
• 12 Glicenstein J, Guero S, Haddad R. Median clefts of the hand. Classification and therapeutic indications apropos of 29 cases. Ann Chir Main Memb Super 1995; 14: 253
• 13 Falliner A. The cleft hand. Proposal of a classification based on 279 cleft hands. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2004; 36: 47-54
• 14 Ogino T, Kato H. Cleft hand without the absence of a finger. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1988; 20: 184-8
• 15 Jones NF, Kono M. Cleft hands with six metacarpals. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29: 720-6
• 16 Foucher G, Loréa P, Hovius S, Pivato G, Medina J. Radial shift of the ulnar fingers: A new technique for special cases of longitudinal central deficiency. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 156-61
• 17 Flatt AE. Cleft hand and central defects. In: Flatt A. editor. The Care of Congenital Hand Anomalies. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1977: p. 265-85
• 18 Barsky AJ. Cleft hand: Classification, incidence, and treatment. Review of the literature and report of nineteen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964; 46: 1707-20
• 19 Miura T, Komada T. Simple method for reconstruction of the cleft hand with an adducted thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 64: 65-7
• 20 Ueba Y. Plastic surgery for the cleft hand. J Hand Surg Am 1981; 6: 557-60
• 21 Snow J, Littler J. Surgical Treatment of Cleft Hand. Presented in Transactions of the Fourth International Congress of Plastic Surgery (Rome). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Excerpta Medica; 1967: p. 888-93
• 22 Oberlin C, Korchi A, Belkheyar Z, Touam C, Macquillan A. Digitalization of the second finger in type 2 central longitudinal deficiencies (clefting) of the hand. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2009; 13: 110-2
• 23 Dautel G, Barbary S. Second toe transfer in congenital hand differences. Chir Main 2008; 27 (Suppl. 01) S48-61