Controversies on Tumor Thickness Versus Nodal Metastasis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas Revealed: A Histopathologist’s Perspective

Abstract

Background: Cervical metastasis has a tremendous impact on prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). However, to date management of clinically negative neck in HNSCC is still a controversial subject. Tumor thickness (TT) is a strong predictor for lymph node involvement in oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). However, controversy exists about the optimal TT cutoff point for a clinically relevant risk to the neck. Aim and Objectives: The aim is to evaluate the relationship between TT and the risk of cervical lymph node involvement and to determine optimal TT cutoff point for prompting prophylactic neck management. Materials and Methods: The clinical files and histological sections of 35 SCC (T1/T2) at buccal mucosa site from clinically determined N0 patients were retrospectively analyzed who underwent surgical treatment of their primary lesion with simultaneous neck dissection. An ocular micrometer was used to measure the TT both in exophytic and ulcerated lesions. Chi-square contingency tables were used to correlate TT and other clinicopathological parameters with metastasis in the neck. Results: Clinically, negative necks turned out pathologically positive in 42.8% (n = 15/35). In the group in which tumor depth exceeded 1.5 mm, the metastatic rate was 86.7% (13/15). In contrast, when the depth of invasion was <1.5 mm, the incidence of cervical metastasis was 13.3% (2/15) irrespective of the 2 stages. Conclusion: TT is a highly significant, objectively measurable prognostic factor in early stage oral cancers and elective neck therapy is indicated for tumors exceeding 1.5 mm invasion.

Keywords

Elective neck therapy - metastasis - oral squamous cell carcinoma

Publication History

Article published online:
23 June 2021

• References

• 1 Pimenta AmaralTM, Da Silva FreireAR, Carvalho AL, Pinto CA, Kowalski LP. Predictive factors of occult metastasis and prognosis of clinical stages I and II squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Oral Oncol 2004; 40: 780-6
• 2 Essig H, Warraich R, Zulfiqar G, Rana M, Eckardt AM, Gellrich NC. et al. Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis for therapeutic decision-making in squamous cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa: A prospective clinical analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2012; 10: 253
• 3 Leemans CR, Tiwari R, Nauta JJ, van der WaalI, Snow GB. Recurrence at the primary site in head and neck cancer and the significance of neck lymph node metastases as a prognostic factor. Cancer 1994; 73: 187-90
• 4 Keski-Säntti H, Atula T, Törnwall J, Koivunen P, Mäkitie A. Elective neck treatment versus observation in patients with T1/T2 N0 squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue. Oral Oncol 2006; 42: 96-101
• 5 Shingaki S, Takada M, Sasai K, Bibi R, Kobayashi T, Nomura T. et al. Impact of lymph node metastasis on the pattern of failure and survival in oral carcinomas. Am J Surg 2003; 185: 278-84
• 6 Huang SH, Hwang D, Lockwood G, Goldstein DP, O'Sullivan B. Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph-node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: A meta-analysis of reported studies. Cancer 2009; 115: 1489-97
• 7 Onercl M, Yilmaz T, Gedikoǧlu G. Tumor thickness as a predictor of cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122: 139-42
• 8 Breslow A. et al. Tumor thickness, level of invasion and node dissection in stage I cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 1975; 182: 572-5
• 9 Mohit-Tabatabai MA, Sobel HJ, Rush BF, Mashberg A. Relation of thickness of floor of mouth stage I and II cancers to regional metastasis. Am J Surg 1986; 152: 351-3
• 10 Spiro RH, Huvos AG, Wong GY, Spiro JD, Gnecco CA, Strong EW. et al. Predictive value of tumor thickness in squamous carcinoma confined to the tongue and floor of the mouth. Am J Surg 1986; 152: 345-50
• 11 Clark JR, Naranjo N, Franklin JH, de AlmeidaJ, Gullane PJ. Established prognostic variables in N0 oral carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 135: 748-53
• 12 Po Wing YuenA, Lam KY, Lam LK, Ho CM, Wong A, Chow TL. et al. Prognostic factors of clinically stage I and II oral tongue carcinoma-A comparative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern, invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score, and pathologic features. Head Neck 2002; 24: 513-20
• 13 Candela FC, Kothari K, Shah JP. Patterns of cervical node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck 1990; 12: 197-203
• 14 DiTroia JF. Nodal metastases and prognosis in carcinoma of the oral cavity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1972; 5: 333-42
• 15 Fukano H, Matsuura H, Hasegawa Y, Nakamura S. Depth of invasion as a predictive factor for cervical lymph node metastasis in tongue carcinoma. Head Neck 1997; 19: 205-10
• 16 Rasgon VM, Cruz RM, Hilsinger RLJr, Sawicki JE. Relation of lymph-node metastasis to histopathologic appearance in oral cavity and oropharyngeal carcinoma: A case series and literature review. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 1103-10
• 17 Mendelson BC, Woods JE, Beahrs OH. Neck dissection in the treatment of carcinoma of the anterior two-thirds of the tongue. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976; 143: 75-80
• 18 Byers RM, Wolf PF, Ballantyne AJ. Rationale for elective modified neck dissection. Head Neck Surg 1988; 10: 160-7
• 19 Shintani S, Matsuura H, Hasegawa Y, Nakayama B, Fujimoto Y. The relationship of shape of tumor invasion to depth of invasion and cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Oncology 1997; 54: 463-7
• 20 Pentenero M, Gandolfo S, Carrozzo M. Importance of tumor thickness and depth of invasion in nodal involvement and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A review of the literature. Head Neck 2005; 27: 1080-91
• 21 Moore C, Kuhns JG, Greenberg RA. Thickness as prognostic aid in upper aerodigestive tract cancer. Arch Surg 1986; 121: 1410-4
• 22 Woolgar JA, Scott J. Prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue/floor of mouth. Head Neck 1995; 17: 463-72
• 23 O'Brien CJ, Lauer CS, Fredricks S, Clifford AR, McNeil EB, Bagia JS. et al. Tumor thickness influences prognosis of T1 and T2 oral cavity cancer – But what thickness?. Head Neck 2003; 25: 937-45
• 24 Gonzalez-Moles MA, Esteban F, Rodriguez-Archilla A, Ruiz-Avila I, Gonzalez-Moles S. Importance of tumour thickness measurement in prognosis of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol 2002; 38: 394-7