Application of Fractal and Euclidean Methods to Differentiate Normal and Neoplastic Thyroid Cells

Abstract

Context: The differentiated papillary and follicular thyroid neoplasms can be characterized from the notions of fractal and Euclidean geometry to overcome the challenges faced by the pathologist. This method was previously used in differentiating preinvasive lesions of cervical cancer. Aims: to characterize the irregularity of histologic samples of normal thyroid cells as well as benign and malignant thyroid papillary and follicular carcinomas, through the box-counting method using the principles of fractal and Euclidian geometry. Settings and Design: This is a retrospective study involving the measurement of thyroid cells through pixels in photographs, applying geometric methods. Subjects and Methods: Photographs of histological samples from normal and neoplastic biopsy samples were taken and processed by a software in order to delimit the borders of the nucleus and cytoplasm. Then, the box-counting method was applied by superimposing grids of 5 and 10 pixels to measure the fractal dimension and the occupied spaces of the cellular surface. Results: The set of papillary and follicular cells evaluated from the occupied spaces from the borders and surfaces of the nucleus and cytoplasm in the 5-pixel grid showed that normal cells are included within a range of values, while the neoplastic variations are differentiable from this range. Conclusions: Fractal and Euclidean geometries can differentiate normality from some benign and malignant thyroid lesions, which opens a path to develop methodologies that characterize more precisely distinctive features between normal and neoplastic cells independent of qualitative criteria from traditional pathology and histology.

Keywords

Cell nucleus - cytoplasm - fractal - histology - pathology

Publication History

Received: 27 September 2020

Accepted: 23 August 2020

Article published online:
14 May 2021

• References

• 1 American Cancer Society. Key Statistics for Thyroid Cancer. 2019. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/thyroidcancer/ about/key statistics.html. [Last accessed 2019 Sep 12].
• 2 Sherma S. Thyroid carcinoma. Lancet 2003; 361: 501-11
• 3 Shah JP. Thyroid carcinoma: Epidemiology, histology, and diagnosis. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2015; 13: 3-6
• 4 Wreesmann VB, Ghossein RA, Patel SG, Harris CP, Schnaser EA, Shaha AR. et al. Genome-wide appraisal of thyroid cancer progression. Am J Pathol 2002; 161: 1549-56
• 5 American Cancer Society. Qué es el Cáncer de Tiroides? 2019. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/es/cancer/cancer-detiroides/acerca/que-es-cancer-de-tiroides.html. Last accessed 2019 Sep 12]
• 6 Kunjumon DT, Upadhyaya K. Histopathological features of papillary thyroid carcinoma with special emphasis on the significance of nuclear features in their diagnosis. Arch Med Health Sci 2014; 2: 16-22
• 7 Beaumont A, Ben Othman S, Fragu P. The fine structure of papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Histopathology 1981; 5: 377-88
• 8 Mandelbrot B. How long is the coast of Britain?. Science 1967; 156: 636-8
• 9 Peitgen J. Length area and dimension. Measuring complexity and scalling properties. In: Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992. p. 183-228
• 10 Baish JH, Jain R. Fractals and cancer. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 3683-8
• 11 Pohlman S, Powell KA, Obuchowski NA, Chilcote WA, Grundfest-Broniatowski S. Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms. Med Phys 1996; 23: 1337-45
• 12 Lefebvre F, Benali H, Kahn E, Di Paola R. A fractal approach to the segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys 1995; 22: 381-90
• 13 Luzi P, Bianciardi G, Miracco C, De Santi MM, Del Vecchio MT, Alia L. et al. Fractal analysis in human pathology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 879: 255-7
• 14 Rodríguez JO, Prieto SE, Correa C, Bernal PA, Puerta GE, Vitery S. et al. Theoretical generalization of normal and sick coronary arteries with fractal dimensions and the arterial intrinsic mathematical harmony. BMC Med Phys 2010; 10: 1
• 15 Prieto Bohórquez SE, Velásquez JO, Correa HerreraSC, Soracipa MuñozMY. Diagnosis of cervical cells based on fractal and Euclidian geometrical measurements: Intrinsic geometric cellular organization. BMC Med Phys 2014; 14: 2
• 16 Velásquez JO, Bohórquez SE, Herrera SC, Cajeli DD, Velásquez DM, de Alonso MM. Geometrical nuclear diagnosis and total paths of cervical cell evolution from normality to cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 2015; 11: 98-104
• 17 Rodríguez J, Moreno N, Alfonso D, Méndez M, Flórez A. Geometrical Characterization of Morphology Equinocyte. Arch Med 2017; 13: 1-5
• 18 Lamani D, Ramegowda DR, Manjunath DR. Fractal dimension as diagnostic parameter to detect glaucoma. Int J Innov Eng Technol 2013; 2: 63-9
• 19 Jelinek H, de Mendonça M, Oréfice F, Garcia C, Nogueira R, Soares J. et al. Fractal analysis of the normal human retinal vasculature. Int J Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 8: 1-5
• 20 George LE, Mohammed EZ. Cancer Tissues Recognition System using Box Counting Method and Artificial Neural Network.International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition; 2011
• 21 Rodríguez J, Prieto S, Tabares L, Rubiano A, Prieto I, Domínguez D. et al. Simulations of cervical cells from normal to atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) with fractal geometry. Rev UDCA Act Div Cient 2013; 16: 303-11
• 22 Rodríguez J. New physical and mathematical diagnosis of fetal monitoring: clinical application prediction. Momento Revista de Física 2012; 44: 49-65
• 23 Rodríguez J, Prieto S, Flórez M, Alarcón C, López R, Aguirre G. et al. Physical-mathematical diagnosis of cardiac dynamic on neonatal sepsis: predictions of clinical application. J Med Med Sci 2014; 5: 102-8
• 24 Rodríguez J. Dynamical systems applied to dynamic variables of patients from the intensive care unit (ICU). Physical and mathematical mortality predictions on ICU. J Med Med Sci 2015; 6: 102-8