Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2020; 9(03): 174-180
DOI: 10.4103/ejgd.ejgd_216_19
Case Report

Clinical workflow of two different CAD/CAM systems for veneers manufacture

Carlos Alberto Jurado
Clinical Digital Dentistry, A.T. Still University Arizona School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Mesa, Arizona, USA
,
Firas Mourad
1   Department of Care Planning and Restorative Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
,
David Felton
1   Department of Care Planning and Restorative Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
,
Jose Villalobos Tinoco
2   Department of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro, Queretaro, Mexico
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Digital technology is improving dentistry by manufacturing restorations faster and easier. Veneers can be handcrafted fabricated by the dental technician or designed by software and fabricated by a milling machine. Currently, there are many scanners available in the market that are clinically acceptable for the fabrication of restorations. However, there have been no clinical reports comparing the clinical protocols of the two most frequently used software programs in the market. The aim of this article is to show the digital workflow of the two most common systems for the fabrication of CAD/CAM veneers.

Keywords

CADCAM - digital dentistry - esthetic dentistry - scanners - technology - veneers

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.




Publication History

Article published online:
01 November 2021

© 2020. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Pincus CR. Building mouth personality. J South Calif Dent Assoc 1938;14:125-9.
  • 2 Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28:163-77.
  • 3 Patel D. Conservative preparation guidelines for CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013;34:472-5.
  • 4 Magne P, Magne M. Use of additive wax-Up and direct intraoral mock-up for enamel preservation with porcelain laminate veneers. Eur J Esthet Dent 2006;1:10-9.
  • 5 Fasbinder DJ. Restorative material options for CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23:911-6, 918, 920 passim.
  • 6 Fasbinder DJ. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:702-4, 706, 708-9.
  • 7 Reiss B. Materials for use in dental CAD/CAM technology-spoiled for choice or a wellspring of new possibilities? Int J Comput Dent 2016;19:95-7.
  • 8 Zandinejad A, Lin WS, Atarodi M, Abdel-Azim T, Metz MJ, Morton D. Digital workflow for virtually designing and milling ceramic lithium disilicate veneers: A clinical report. Oper Dent 2015;40:241-6.
  • 9 Schmitter M, Seydler B B. Minimally invasive lithium disilicate ceramic veneers fabricated using chairside CAD/CAM: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:71-4.
  • 10 Durán Ojeda G, Henríquez Gutiérrez I, Guzmán Marusic Á, Báez Rosales A, Tisi Lanchares JP. A step-by-step conservative approach for CAD-CAM laminate veneers. Case Rep Dent 2017;2017:3801419.
  • 11 Vafiadis D, Goldstein G. Single visit fabrication of a porcelain laminate veneer with CAD/CAM technology: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:71-3.
  • 12 da Cunha LF, Mukai E, Hamerschmitt RM, Correr GM. Fabrication of lithium silicate ceramic veneers with a CAD/CAM approach: A clinical report of cleidocranial dysplasia. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:355-9.
  • 13 Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016;60:72-84.
  • 14 Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:770-7.
  • 15 Wiedhahn K, Kerschbaum T, Fasbinder DF. Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: A nine-year report. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:233-46.
  • 16 Nejatidanesh F, Amjadi M, Akouchekian M, Savabi O. Clinical performance of CEREC AC Bluecam conservative ceramic restorations after five years-A retrospective study. J Dent 2015;43:1076-82.
  • 17 Baroudi K, Ibraheem S. Assesment of chair-side computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorations: A review of the literature. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:96-104.
  • 18 Ribeiro P, Herrero-Climent M, Díaz-Castro C, Rios-Santos JV, Padros R, Mur JG, et al. Accuracy of implant cast generated with conventional and digital impressions – An in vitro study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:1599.
  • 19 Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principal of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9.
  • 20 Essen SD. Digital imaging in dentistry. Todays FDA 2011;23:62-8.
  • 21 McKenna R. Marketing is everything. Harv Bus Rev 1991;69:65-79.
  • 22 Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137 Suppl:7S-13S.
  • 23 Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:92.
  • 24 Herrguth M, Wichmann M, Reich S. The aesthetics of all-ceramic veneered and monolithic CAD/CAM crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:747-52.
  • 25 Jurado CA. Optimal tooth reduction for veneer restorations: A case report. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2019;9:99-103.
  • 26 Guichet DL. Digital workflows in the management of the esthetically discriminating patient. Dent Clin North Am 2019;63:331-44.
  • 27 Puri S. Material choices for CAD/CAM. Dent Today 2018;01:1-4.
  • 28 Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:486-95.
  • 29 Jurado CA, Villalobos-Tinoco J, Tsujimoto A, Castro P, Torrealba Y. The art of minimal tooth reduction for veneer restorations. Eur J Gen Dent 2020;9:45-52.
  • 30 Albino LG, Chaves ET, Lima VP, Lima GS. Restoration of a single darkened central incisor with a modified ceramic veneer. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:369-72.