CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2017; 11(01): 083-088
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_191_16
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Attitude and knowledge of isolation in operative field among undergraduate dental students

Fuad Abdo Al-Sabri
1   1Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi Dental College, Riyadh, KSA
2   Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen
,
Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakby
1   1Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi Dental College, Riyadh, KSA
3   Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
,
Ahmed Mohammed Hassan
1   1Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi Dental College, Riyadh, KSA
3   Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the general attitude of undergraduate dental students toward rubber dam use, specifically focusing on operative procedures before starting to serve community.Methods:Questionnaires were distributed to undergraduate clinical years' students of two private colleges; Al-Farabi Dental College, Riyadh, KSA and Buraidah Private Colleges, Qassim, KSA. Questions were asked about areas where the students used rubber dam in operative procedures, in which types of caries classes, and in which type of restoration they frequently used the rubber dam.Results: We found that students of both private dental colleges agreed with the opinions that proper isolation cannot be achieved for the restoration of operative procedures without using rubber dam and restoration placed under rubber dam have a greater longevity than those placed without.Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that the perceptions of dental students on rubber dam need to be improved and strategies should be developed so that this valuable adjunct will comprise one of the indispensable elements of dental care.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 921-30
  • 2 Mala S, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Dummer PM. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 632-8
  • 3 Abdulrab S, Al-Maweri S, Doumani M, Mourshed B, Alaizari N. Rubber dam: Attitudes and practices of senior dental students in Saudi Arabia. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2016; 15: 79-83
  • 4 Iwatani K, Matsuo K, Kawase S, Wakimoto N, Taguchi A, Ogasawara T. Effects of open mouth and rubber dam on upper airway patency and breathing. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1295-9
  • 5 Ahmad IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: A review. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 963-72
  • 6 Stewardson DA, McHugh ES. Patients' attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 812-9
  • 7 Gilbert GH, Litaker MS, Pihlstrom DJ, Amundson CW, Gordan VV. DPBRN Collaborative Group. Rubber dam use during routine operative dentistry procedures: Findings from the dental PBRN. Tex Dent J 2013; 130: 337-47
  • 8 Cohen S, Schwartz S. Endodontic complications and the law. J Endod 1987; 13: 191-7
  • 9 Udoye CI, Jafarzadeh H. Rubber dam use among a subpopulation of Nigerian dentists. J Oral Sci 2010; 52: 245-9
  • 10 Joynt RB, Davis EL, Schreier PH. Rubber dam usage among practicing dentists. Oper Dent 1989; 14: 176-81
  • 11 Al-Omari MA, Al-Dwairi ZN. Compliance with infection control programs in private dental clinics in Jordan. J Dent Educ 2005; 69: 693-8
  • 12 Whitworth JM, Seccombe GV, Shoker K, Steele JG. Use of rubber dam and irrigant selection in UK general dental practice. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 435-41
  • 13 Jenkins SM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM. A study of endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice within the UK. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 16-22
  • 14 Feierabend SA, Matt J, Klaiber B. A comparison of conventional and new rubber dam systems in dental practice. Oper Dent 2011; 36: 243-50
  • 15 Hill EE, Rubel BS. Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use?. J Dent Educ 2008; 72: 1177-81
  • 16 Ryan W, O'Connel A. The attitudes of undergraduate dental students to the use of the rubber dam. J Ir Dent Assoc 2007; 53: 87-91
  • 17 Going RE, Sawinski VJ. Parameters related to the use of the rubber dam. J Am Dent Assoc 1968; 77: 598-601
  • 18 Unal GC, Kaya BU, Tac AG, Kececi AD. Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 376-84
  • 19 Peciuliene V, Rimkuviene J, Aleksejuniene J, Haapasalo M, Drukteinis S, Maneliene R. Technical aspects of endodontic treatment procedures among Lithuanian general dental practitioners. Stomatologija 2010; 12: 42-50
  • 20 Slaus G, Bottenberg P. A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 759-67
  • 21 Whitten BH, Gardiner DL, Jeansonne BG, Lemon RR. Current trends in endodontic treatment: Report of a national survey. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1333-41
  • 22 Reuter JE. The isolation of teeth and the protection of the patient during endodontic treatment. Int Endod J 1983; 16: 173-81
  • 23 Jones CM, Reid JS. Patient and operator attitudes toward rubber dam. ASDC J Dent Child 1988; 55: 452-4
  • 24 Terry DA. An essential component to adhesive dentistry: The rubber dam. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005; 17: 106-108