PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2017; 04(04): S65-S75
DOI: 10.4103/2348-0548.199952
Conference Proceeding
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Outcome and rehabilitation of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Dhaval P. Shukla
1   Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
08. Mai 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is a dreaded neurosurgical disorder. Although the mortality has been declining in the past three decades, the disability after SAH is still significant. The main determinants of outcome are age, clinical grade, amount of SAH and size of aneurysm. Both neurophysical deficits and neuropsychological impairments are determinants of functional outcome after SAH. Patients should be assessed using outcome measures for both traumatic brain injury and stroke. Early rehabilitation after SAH improves not only physical outcome but also cognitive and functional outcome.

Keywords

Cognitive - neuropsychological - outcome - rehabilitation - subarachnoid haemorrhage
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Al-Shahi R, White PM, Davenport RJ, Lindsay KW. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. BMJ 2006; 333: 235-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hop JW, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review. Stroke 1997; 28: 660-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lovelock CE, Rinkel GJ, Rothwell PM. Time trends in outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage: Population-based study and systematic review. Neurology 2010; 74: 1494-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage: Diagnosis, causes and management. Brain 2001; 124 (Pt 2) 249-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jaja BN, Lingsma H, Steyerberg EW, Schweizer TA, Thorpe KE, Macdonald RL. et al. Neuroimaging characteristics of ruptured aneurysm as predictors of outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Pooled analyses of the SAHIT cohort. J Neurosurg 2016; 124: 1703-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Diringer MN, Edwards DF. Admission to a neurologic/neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit is associated with reduced mortality rate after intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 635-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Josephson SA, Douglas VC, Lawton MT, English JD, Smith WS, Ko NU. Improvement in Intensive Care Unit outcomes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage after initiation of neurointensivist co-management. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 626-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA. et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366: 809-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jaja BN, Cusimano MD, Etminan N, Hanggi D, Hasan D, Ilodigwe D. et al. Clinical prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2013; 18: 143-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Risselada R, Lingsma HF, Bauer-Mehren A, Friedrich CM, Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS. et al. Prediction of 60 day case-fatality after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: Results from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 261-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 le Roux AA, Wallace MC. Outcome and cost of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2010; 21: 235-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lanzino G, Kassell NF, Germanson TP, Kongable GL, Truskowski LL, Torner JC. et al. Age and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Why do older patients fare worse?. J Neurosurg 1996; 85: 410-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jaja BN, Lingsma H, Schweizer TA, Thorpe KE, Steyerberg EW, Macdonald RL. SAHIT Collaboration. Prognostic value of premorbid hypertension and neurological status in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Pooled analyses of individual patient data in the SAHIT repository. J Neurosurg 2015; 122: 644-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bulters DO, Santarius T, Chia HL, Parker RA, Trivedi R, Kirkpatrick PJ. et al. Causes of neurological deficits following clipping of 200 consecutive ruptured aneurysms in patients with good-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153: 295-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cedzich C, Roth A. Neurological and psychosocial outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage, and the hunt and hess scale as a predictor of clinical outcome. Zentralbl Neurochir 2005; 66: 112-8
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ogden JA, Mee EW, Henning M, Smith RR, Haines SJ. A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 572-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mahaney KB, Todd MM, Bayman EO, Torner JC. IHAST Investigators. Acute postoperative neurological deterioration associated with surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysm: Incidence, predictors, and outcomes. J Neurosurg 2012; 116: 1267-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wong GK, Lam SW, Ngai K, Wong A, Siu D, Poon WS. et al. Cognitive domain deficits in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage at 1 year. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84: 1054-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stienen MN, Weisshaupt R, Fandino J, Fung C, Keller E, Hildebrandt G. et al. Current practice in neuropsychological outcome reporting after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013; 155: 2045-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Al-Khindi T, Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA. Cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2010; 41: e519-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Haug T, Sorteberg A, Sorteberg W, Lindegaard KF, Lundar T, Finset A. Cognitive outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Time course of recovery and relationship to clinical, radiological, and management parameters. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 649-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Suarez JI. Timing of neuropsychological outcome measures in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2007; 38: 1724-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Dey S, Kumar KJ, Shukla D, Bhat D. Neurological, neuropsychological, and functional outcome after good grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurol India. 2017 [In Press].
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hütter BO, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Gilsbach JM. Cognitive deficits in the acute stage after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 1054-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Shukla D, Devi BI, Agrawal A. Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011; 113: 435-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rao S, Subbukrishna D, Kumar G. NIMHANS Neuropsychology Battery Manual. Bangalore: NIMHANS; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Stern M, Chang D, Odell M, Sperber K. Rehabilitation implications of non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage. Brain Inj 2006; 20: 679-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Caeiro L, Santos CO, Ferro JM, Figueira ML. Neuropsychiatric disturbances in acute subarachnoid haemorrhage. Eur J Neurol 2011; 18: 857-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sanchez CE, Ogilvy CS, Carter BS. Outcomes studies in cerebrovascular neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2007; 22: E11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 NIHSS. NIH Stroke Scale. Available from: http://www.ninds.nih.gov/doctors/nih_stroke_scale.pdf [Last cited on 2012 Dec 21].
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ. The Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale as prognostic tools for long-term outcomes after stroke: A qualitative review of the literature. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23: 1627-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J. Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1999; 30: 1538-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 566-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Dombovy ML, Drew-Cates J, Serdans R. Recovery and rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage: Part II. Long-term follow-up. Brain Inj 1998; 12: 887-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. J Neurosurg 1988; 68: 985-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Teasdale GM. Assessing disability after head injury: Improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurosurg 1998; 89: 939-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Passier PE, Visser-Meily JM, Rinkel GJ, Lindeman E. Post MW Determinants of health-related quality of life after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review. Qual Life Res 2013; 22: 1027-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Traumatic Brain Injury: Multi Organizational Consensus Recommendations for India. 2015 Available from: http://www.ntsi.co.in/Version.pdf [Last cited on 2016 May 03].
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kelly C, Foxe JJ, Garavan H. Patterns of normal human brain plasticity after practice and their implications for neurorehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87 (12) Suppl (Suppl. 02) S20-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Olkowski BF, Devine MA, Slotnick LE, Veznedaroglu E, Liebman KM, Arcaro ML. et al. Safety and feasibility of an early mobilization program for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 208-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Karic T, Røe C, Nordenmark TH, Becker F, Sorteberg A. Impact of early mobilization and rehabilitation on global functional outcome one year after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Rehabil Med 2016; 48: 676-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Karic T, Røe C, Nordenmark TH, Becker F, Sorteberg A. Effect of early mobilization and rehabilitation on complications in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2016: 1-9 [Epub ahead of print], PubMed (PMID: 27058204)
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Ahn JH. Rehabilitation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. In: Le Roux PD, Winn HR, Newell DW. editors. Management of Cerebral Aneurysms. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 499-506
    Google Scholar
  • 44 DePippo KL, Holas MA, Reding MJ, Mandel FS, Lesser ML. Dysphagia therapy following stroke: A controlled trial. Neurology 1994; 44: 1655-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Robba C, Bacigaluppi S, Bragazzi N, Lavinio A, Gurnell M, Bilotta F. et al. Clinical prevalence and outcome impact of pituitary dysfunction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Pituitary 2016; 19: 522-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Saciri BM, Kos N. Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: Outcomes of early rehabilitation after surgical repair of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 334-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Shimamura N, Matsuda N, Satou J, Nakano T, Ohkuma H. Early ambulation produces favorable outcome and nondemential state in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients older than 70 years of age. World Neurosurg 2014; 81: 330-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kara B, Yozbatiran N, Arda MN. Functional results of physiotherapy programme on patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Turk Neurosurg 2007; 17: 83-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Cheng H, Shi J, Zhou M. Cognitive assessment in Chinese patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Behav Neurol 2006; 17: 117-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar