Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2014; 3(01): 34-38
DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.126208
Original Article

Can dentin surfaces be bonded safely with total-etch and self-etch systems?

Mehmet Akin
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
,
Zeliha Muge Baka
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
,
Zehra Ileri
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
,
Faruk Ayhan Basciftci
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective: To assess and compare the shear bond strengths (SBSs) of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and dentin surfaces by using total-etching and 3 different self-etching adhesives. Materials and Methods: A total of 160 extracted mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 4 groups. In Group I, the hard tissue was etched with 37% phosphoric acid; in Group II, Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer (TSEP) system was used; in Group III, Clearfil Tri-S Bond Plus was used; and, in Group IV, AdheSE was used. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups: The enamel surfaces were conditioned in subgroup-A, and the dentin surfaces were conditioned in subgroup-B. The samples were stored in water for 24 h at 37°C and then thermocycled. The SBS in megapascals (MPa) was determined by a shear test with 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed, and failure types were classified with modified adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. The data were analyzed with two-way analyses of variance, Tukey′s, and Chi-square tests at the 0.05 level. Results: The mean SBS value of subgroup-A in Group I was significantly higher than the mean values in the other groups (P<0.05). There were no significant differences among the SBS values in the other groups (P>0.05). Significant differences were found in the ARI between subgroup-A in Group I and the other groups (P<0.001). Conclusions: When used on the enamel, the self-etch systems did not have bond strengths as high as that in the conventional method. However, the self-etch systems can be used as successfully as the conventional method on dentin surfaces.

Keywords

Adhesive - bonding - dentin surfaces - shear bond strength


Publication History

Article published online:
01 November 2021

© 2014. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Bishara SE, Laffoon JF, Vonwald L, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:521-5.
  • 2 Newman GV, Snyder WH, Wilson CE Jr. Acrylic adhesives for bonding attachments to tooth surfaces. Angle Orthod 1968;38:12-8.
  • 3 Retief DH, Dreyer CJ, Gavron G. The direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth by means of an epoxy resin adhesive. Am J Orthod 1970;58:21-40.
  • 4 Thanos CE, Munholland T, Caputo AA. Adhesion of mesh base direct bonding brackets. Am J Orthod 1979;75:421-30.
  • 5 Gorelick L. Bonding metal brackets with a self-polymerizing sealant-composite: A 12-month assessment. Am J Orthod 1977;71:542-53.
  • 6 Proffit W. Contemporary Orthodontics. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1986. p. 287.
  • 7 Jain P, Stewart GP. Effect of dentin primer on shear bond strength of composite resin to moist and dry enamel. Oper Dent 2000;25:51-8.
  • 8 Uysal T, Ulker M, Ramoglu SI, Ertas H. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1089-94.
  • 9 Akin M, Aksakalli S, Basciftci FA, Demir A. The effect of tooth bleaching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using self-etching primer systems. Eur J Dent 2012;7:55-60.
  • 10 Cehreli SB, Guzey A, Arhun N, Cetinsahin A, Unver B. The effects of prophylactic ozone pretreatment of enamel on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with total or self-etch adhesive systems. Eur J Dent 2010;4:367-73.
  • 11 Donmez N, Ari H, Belli S. Effect of storage temperature on bond strength of a self-etch adhesive system to pulp chamber dentin. Eur J Dent 2009;3:314-7.
  • 12 Miller RA. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:42-5.
  • 13 Wiltshire WA, Noble J. Clinical and laboratory perspectives of improved orthodontic bonding to normal, hypoplastic, and fluorosed enamel. Semin Orthod 2010;16:55-65.
  • 14 Seow K. Clinical diagnosis and management strategies of amelogenesis imperfecta variants. Pediatr Dent 1993;15:384-93.
  • 15 Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.
  • 16 Attar N, Taner TU, Tulumen E, Korkmaz Y. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded using conventional vs one and two step self-etching/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod 2007;77:518-23.
  • 17 Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:348-50.
  • 18 White LW. An expedited in direct bonding technique. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:36-41.
  • 19 Uysal T, Ustdal A, Kurt G. Evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:214-8.
  • 20 Bulut H, Turkun M, Turkun LS, Isiksal E. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of 3 curing bracket bonding systems combined with an antibacterial adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:77-83.
  • 21 Powers JM, Messersmith ML. Enamel etching and bond strength. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T, editors. Orthodontic Materials: Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2001. p. 105-22.
  • 22 Ogaard B, Bishara SE, Duschner H. Enamel effects during bonding-debonding and treatment with fixed appliances. In: Graber TM, Eliades T, Athanasiou AE, editors. Risk Management in Orthodontics: Experts′ Guide to Malpractice. Carol Stream: Quintessence; 2004. p. 19-46.
  • 23 Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues. Oper Dent 2007;32:166-72.
  • 24 El-Araby AM, Talic YF. The effect of thermocycling on the adhesion of self-etching adhesives on dental enamel and dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:17-24.
  • 25 Munck De J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, et al. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:39-49.
  • 26 Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8.
  • 27 Bowen RL, Rodrigues MS. Tensile bond strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962;64:378-87.
  • 28 Retief DH. Failure at the dentin adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil 1974;1:265-84.
  • 29 Yap AU, Soh MS, Han TT, Siow KS. Influence of curing lights and modes on cross-link density of dental composites. Oper Dent 2004;29:410-5.
  • 30 Al-Saleh M, El-Mowafy O. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets with new self-adhesive resin cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:528-33.