CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2013; 2(01): 62-66
DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.106820
Original Article

Biological restorations: Option of reincarnation for severely mutilated teeth

Kulvinder Kaur Wadhwani
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, King George′s Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Mukesh Hasija
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, King George′s Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Babita Meena
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jamia Milia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Deepti Wadhwa
2   Department of Periodontics, Dr. Z. A. Dental College, AMU, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
Rakesh Yadav
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, King George′s Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations


Objective: Esthetic and functional rehabilitation of severely mutilated fractured central incisors teeth using homogenous biological fragment bonding. Materials and Methods: Freshly extracted maxillary central incisors were treated endodontically and post spaces were prepared. Intra-radicular biological post core were fabricated from the sectioned roots of extracted canines. Cementation of biological post core in prepared space was done after clinical and radiological confirmation. Subsequent esthetic rehabilitation was done using adaptation of biological crown which was prepared from morphologically similar extracted maxillary central incisor. Results: The association between biological crowns and post core offers excellent esthetic, functional, and psychosocial results, which justifies the use of this technique to achieve the morphofunctional recovery of extensively damaged teeth. Conclusion: The biological restorations are an alternative technique for reconstruction of extensively damaged teeth that provides highly functional and esthetic outcomes.

Publication History

Article published online:
01 November 2021

© 2013. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Chosack A, Eildeman E. Rehabilitation of fractured incisor using the patient′s natural crown. Case report. J Dent Child 1964;31:19-21.
  • 2 Andreasen JO, Ravn JJ. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish population sample. Int J Oral Surg 1972;1:235-9.
  • 3 Galindo VA, Nogueira JS, Yamasaki E, Kós Miranda D. Biological posts and natural crowns bonding - Alternatives for anterior primary teeth restoration. J bras odontoped odontol bebe 2000;16:513-20.
  • 4 Kaizer OB, Bonfante G, Pereira Filho LD. Utilization of biological posts to reconstruct weakened roots. RGO-Rev Gaúcha Odontol 2008; 56:7-13.
  • 5 Yilmaz Y, Zehir C, Eyuboglu O, Belduz N. Evaluation of success in the reattachment of coronal fractures. Dent Traumatol 2008;24:151-8.
  • 6 Demarco FF, de Moura FR, Tarquinio SB, Lima FG. Reattachment using a fragment from an extracted tooth to treat complicated coronal fracture. Dent Traumatol 2008;24:257-61.
  • 7 Imparato JC, Bonecker MJ, Duarte DA, Guedes Pinto AC. Restorations in anterior primary teeth: An alternative technique through gluing of natural crowns. J bras odontoped odontol bebe 1998;1:63-72.
  • 8 Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-8.
  • 9 Andreasen FM, Norén JG, Andreasen JO, Engelhardtsen S, Lindh-Strömberg U. Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: A multicenter clinical study. Quintessence Int 1995;26:669-81.
  • 10 Grewal N, Reeshu S. Biological restorations: An alternative esthetic treatment for restoration of severely mutilated primary anterior teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;1:42-7.
  • 11 Habelitz S, Marshall GW Jr, Balooch M, Marshall SJ. Nanoindentation and storage of teeth. J Biomech 2002;35:995-8.
  • 12 Alvares I, Sensi LG, Araujo EM Jr, Araujo E. Silicone index: An alternative approach for tooth fragment reattachment. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:240-5.
  • 13 Hall DA. Restoration of a shattered tooth. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:105-6.
  • 14 Perdigão J, Lopes M. Dentin bonding-state of the art 1999. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:1151-62.
  • 15 Corrêa-Faria P, Alcântara CE, Caldas-Diniz MV, Botelho AM, Tavano KT. "Biological restoration": Root canal and coronal reconstruction. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010;22:168-77.
  • 16 Busato AL, Antunes M. Heterogeneous bonding in anterior fractured teeth. RGO-Rev Gaúcha Odontol 1984;32:137-40.
  • 17 Candido MS, Pozzobon RT, Porto Neto ST. Esthetic resolution through heterogeneous bonding root-coronal, laminate and recontourn. J Bras Odontol Clin 1999;15:29-33.
  • 18 Reis A, Loguercio AD, Kraul A, Matson E. Reattachment of fractured teeth: A review of literature regarding techniques and materials. Oper Dent 2004;29:226-33.
  • 19 Baratieri LN, Ritter AV, Monteiro Júnior S, de Mello Filho JC. Tooth fragment reattachment: An alternative for restoration of fractured anterior teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:115-25.