CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2013; 2(01): 37-41
DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.106805
Original Article

Invasive versus non-invasive method of assessment of distance between the tip of papilla to the crest of interdental bone

Saurabh Wahi
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, BRS Dental College and Hospital, Panchkula, Haryana, India
,
Kamalpreet Chhina
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, BRS Dental College and Hospital, Panchkula, Haryana, India
,
Vipin Chhabra
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, BRS Dental College and Hospital, Panchkula, Haryana, India
,
Rakhi Bhatnagar
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, BRS Dental College and Hospital, Panchkula, Haryana, India
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Statement of Problem: Anatomic and histologic make up of interdental region is crucial in maintaining the integrity and health of interdental papilla during surgical and restorative procedures. The effect of vertical and horizontal distance between the teeth on the incidence of interproximal papilla has been widely explored and is considered as a contentious issue. Though several non-surgical methods have been developed to assess bone level, the accuracy and reliability of these methods were questioned. Purpose and Aim: To compare the reliability of the non-invasive method using radiographs with invasive method to measure the length of papilla from the tip of papilla to crest of interdental bone. Materials and Methods: In the present study, non-invasive method using radiograph was compared to invasive method to measure length of papilla from the tip of papilla to crest of interdental bone. Radiographic length, bone probing length, and actual papilla length was measured in 20 chronic periodontitis patients, and the results were statistically analyzed. Results and Conclusion: A statistically significant correlation was observed in invasive versus non-invasive method of assessment of distance between the tip of papilla to the crest of interdental bone, indicating the importance of standardization of radiographic aids.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 November 2021

© 2013. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Cohen B. A study of the periodontal epithelium. Br Dent J 1962;2:112.
  • 2 Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of the bone on the presence or absence of interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63:995-6.
  • 3 Greenberg J, Laster L, Listgarten MA. Transgingival probing as a potential estimator of alveolar bone level. J Periodontol 1976;47:514-7.
  • 4 Ursell MJ. Relationships between alveolar bone levels measured at surgery, estimated by transgingival probing and clinical attachment level measurements. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:81-6.
  • 5 Kim HY, Yi SW, Choi SH. Bone probing measurement as a reliable evaluation of the bone level in periodontal defects. J Periodontol 2000;71:729-35.
  • 6 Lee DW, Kim CK, Park KH. Non-invasive method to measure the length of soft tissue from the top of the papilla to the crestal bone. J Periodontol 2005;76:1311-4.
  • 7 Kohl JT, Zender HA. Morphology of interdental gingival tissue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961;14:257-95.
  • 8 Lang NP, Hill RW. Radiographs in Periodontics. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:16-28.
  • 9 Greenfield DS, Williams RC, Goldhaber P. Radiographic measurement of alveolar bone loss: A perspective in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1981;8:474-80.
  • 10 Papapanou PN, Wennstrom JL. Radiographic and clinical assessments of destructive periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:609-12.
  • 11 Chang LC (II). The association between embrasure morphology and central papilla recession. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:432-6.
  • 12 Rosling B, Hollender L, Nyman S. A radiographic method for assessing changes in alveolar bone height following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontal 1975;2:211-7.
  • 13 Zybutz M, Rapoport D, Laurell L. Comparisons of clinical and radiographic measurements of interproximal vertical defects before and 1 year after surgical treatments. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:179-86.