CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry 2013; 2(01): 31-36
DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.106802
Original Article

Change in salivary pH following use of homeopathic medicines: A preliminary study

Priya Subramaniam
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, The Oxford Dental College and Hospital, Hosur Road, Bommanahalli, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Krishna Kumar
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, The Oxford Dental College and Hospital, Hosur Road, Bommanahalli, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
› Institutsangaben


Objective: Homeopathic preparations are popular and well accepted by parents and children. These preparations are easily available and are prescribed for acute and chronic conditions. However, their sugar content may affect oral health. Aims and Objectives: This preliminary study assessed salivary pH following administration of homeopathic medicines commonly prescribed for children. Materials and Methods: Forty-five normal and healthy children were divided into 3 groups of 15 children each: Group 1 was given a placebo, group 2 was given chamomilla (2x), and group 3 was given arsenicum (2x). Each child was given 2 pellets to be placed below the tongue and allowed to dissolve completely. Unstimulated saliva samples were collected at baseline, and following 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes of administration. The saliva samples were suitably transferred to the laboratory for recording of pH using a digital pH meter. The titratable acidity of both homeopathic medicines was assessed. Data was subjected to statistical analysis. Results: Mean salivary pH at 15 minutes was 5.40 in group 1, 5.16 in group 2 and 5.42 in group 3, which was significant. (P=0.000) At 30 and 60 minutes, pH in groups 2 and 3 remained lower than that of group 1. The titratable acidity of chamomilla and arsenicum was found to be 0.14 mmol and 0.018 mmol, respectively. Conclusion: There was a significant reduction in salivary pH at 5, 15, and 30 minutes in groups 1 and 2. In all groups, salivary pH did not return to baseline values even after one hour of administering the homeopathic pellets.


Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. November 2021

© 2013. European Journal of General Dentistry. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Hahnemann S, O′Reily WB, editor. Organon of the Medical Art. Palo Alto, California (USA): Birdcage Books; 1996.
  • 2 Teixeira MZ. New homeopathic medicines: Use of modern drugs according to the principle of similitude. Homeopathy 2011;100:244-52.
  • 3 Lessell CB. Textbook of Dental Homeopathy: For Dental Surgeons, Homeopathists and General Medical Practitioners. England: Saffron Walden; 2004.
  • 4 Jütte R, Riley D. A review of the use and role of low potencies in homeopathy. Complement Ther Med 2005;13:291-6.
  • 5 Rossi E, Endrizzi C, Panozzo MA, Bianchi A, Da Frè M. Homeopathy in the public health system: A seven-year observational study at Lucca Hospital (Italy). Homeopathy 2009;98:142-8.
  • 6 Bhat SS, Sargod SS, George D. Dentistry and homeopathy: An overview. Dent Update 2005;32:486-8, 491.
  • 7 Burt BA, Pai S. Sugar consumption and caries risk: A systematic review. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1017-23.
  • 8 Anderson CA, Curzon ME, Van Loveren C, Tatsi C, Duggal MS. Sucrose and dental caries: A review of the evidence. Obes Rev 2009;10:41-54.
  • 9 Passos IA, Sampaio FC, Martínez CR, Freitas CH. Sucrose concentration and pH in liquid oral pediatric medicines of long-term use for children. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2010;27:132-7.
  • 10 Peres KG, Oliveira CT, Peres MA, Raymundo Mdos S, Fett R. Sugar content in liquid oral medicines for children. Rev Saude Publica 2005;39:486-9.
  • 11 Neves BG, Farah A, Lucas E, de Sousa VP, Maia LC. Are pediatric medicines risk factors for dental caries and dental erosion? Community Dent Health 2010;27:46-51.
  • 12 Pomarico L, Czauski G, Portela MB, de Souza IP, Kneipp L, de AraújoSoares RM, et al. Cariogenic and erosive potential of the medication used by HIV-infected children: pH and sugar concentration. Community Dent Health 2008;25:170-2.
  • 13 Bigeard L. The role of medication and sugars in pediatric dental patients. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:443-56.
  • 14 Wu KP, Ke JY, Chung CY, Chen CL, Hwang TL, Chou MY, et al. Relationship between Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate and Saliva Composition of Healthy Children in Taiwan. Chang Gung Med J 2008;31:281-6.
  • 15 Maguire A, Baqir W, Nunn JH. Are sugars-free medicines more erosive than sugars-containing medicines? An in vitro study of pediatric medicines with prolonged oral clearance used regularly and long-term by children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007;17:231-8.
  • 16 Arora R, Mukherjee U, Arora V. Erosive potential of sugar free and sugar containing pediatric medicines given regularly and long term to children. Indian J Pediatr 2012;79:759-63.
  • 17 Maguire A, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Prevalence of long-term use of liquid oral medicines by children in the northern region, England. Community Dent Health 1994;11:91-6.
  • 18 Sahgal J, Sood PB, Raju OS. A comparison of oral hygiene status and dental caries in children on long term liquid oral medications to those not administered with such medications. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20:144-51.
  • 19 Durward C, Thou T. Dental caries and sugar-containing liquid medicines for children in New Zealand. N Z Dent J 1997;93:124-9.
  • 20 Taji S, Seow WK. Literature review of dental erosion in children. Aust Dent J 2010;55:358-67.
  • 21 Lussi A, Jaeggi T. Dental erosion in children. Monogr Oral Sci 2006;20:140-51.
  • 22 Mackie IC, Bentley E. Sugar-containing or sugar-free pediatric medicines: Does it really matter? Dent Update 1994;21:192-4.
  • 23 Abelson DC, Mandel ID. The Effect of Saliva on Plaque pH in vivo. J Dent Res 1981;60:1634-8.
  • 24 Sreebny CM. Saliva in health and disease: An appraisal and update. Int Dent J 2000;50:140-61 .
  • 25 Mazengo MC, Soderling E, Alakuijala P, Tiekso J, Tenovuo J, Simell O, et al. Flow rate and composition of whole saliva in rural and urban Tanzania with special reference to diet, age, and gender. Caries Res 1994;28:468-7621.
  • 26 Brawley RE. Studies of the pH of normal resting saliva: Variations with age and sex. J Dent Res 1935;15:55-77.
  • 27 Larsen MJ, Pearce EIF. Saturation of human saliva with respect to calcium salts. Arch Oral Biol 2003;48:317-22.
  • 28 Fejerskov O, Kidd E, editor. Dental Caries: The disease and its clinical management. 2 nd ed. United States: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. p. 198.
  • 29 Marathaki E, Pollard MA, Curzon ME. The effect of sucrose in medicines on plaque pH. Int J Paediatr Dent 1995;5:231-5.
  • 30 Mentes A. pH changes in dental plaque after using sugar-free pediatric medicine. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001;25:307-12.
  • 31 Hellwig E, Lussi A. Oral hygiene products and acidic medicines. Monogr Oral Sci 2006;20:112-8.
  • 32 Rugg-Gunn AJ, Maguire A, Gordon PH, McCabe JF, Stephenson G. Comparison of erosion of dental enamel by four drinks using an intra-oral appliance. Caries Res 1998;32:337-43.
  • 33 Johansson AK, Sorvari R, Birkhed D, Meurman JH. Dental erosion in deciduous teeth-an in vivo and in vitro study. J Dent 2001;29:333-40.